Sentry is an application performance monitoring product for developers and software teams, used to track errors and performance issues in their software and resolve them faster · sentry.io ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Honeybadger at 13%.
Ranked first. Next is Rollbar at 12%. 12 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Rollbar at 10%.
“The best tools (like Sentry or Rollbar) hash cookies automatically so the vendor never sees user IDs... Often, companies buy an APM platform for management metrics but use Sentry/Rollbar specifically for fixing bugs.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Sentry: Excellent for full-stack (deep language support, session replays, AI features). Generous free tier, scales well... Often a top pick for dev teams.”Grok 4.20 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Top Overall Recommendation: Sentry ... the de facto standard for software teams, offering the best overall developer experience and stack coverage.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“For most small companies, Sentry's free tier is often the best starting point due to its comprehensive features and generous limits.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Research by Wallarm demonstrated how services like Sentry and Datadog could be manipulated through UI integration to capture sensitive information”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · warning
“commonly used and feature-rich, but its breadcrumbs/session context and broad observability integrations can collect a lot of surrounding activity”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
“Sentry, Rollbar, and Bugsnag can be strong error trackers, but a dedicated error tool may not replace infrastructure metrics”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Pricing pain... Complex setup... Don't avoid Sentry or Rollbar outright — they're industry standards for a reason.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Sentry, over the 318 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 189 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 176 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 156 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 111 | 9 | View → | |
| 94 | 3 | View → | |
| 78 | 0 | View → | |
| 75 | 29 | View → | |
| 67 | 1 | View → | |
| 55 | 5 | View → | |
| 55 | 4 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Sentry →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Sentry's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 266 of the 318 answers that named Sentry and are not a share of its labels.
477 of the 637 domain citations in answers naming Sentry came from a third party's page. Fifty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Grok 4.20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 8,765 | undated | Feature flags | ||
| Blog | 992 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | APM, Feature flags | |
| Conference or event | 169 | 0 | 2024-04-30 | Feature flags | |
| Case study | 82 | undated | |||
| News or press | 31 | undated | APM | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 6 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2024-05-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2018-06-04 |
As the event pages on sentry.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page sentry.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name feature flags (54); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.