Error and crash monitoring · RankedRollbar
Rollbar is a code-first observability platform for software teams, used for error and crash monitoring in web and mobile applications · rollbar.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Sentry is first at 76%.
Sentry is first at 76%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Sentry is first at 61%.
Why models recommend it
“The best tools (like Sentry or Rollbar) hash cookies automatically so the vendor never sees user IDs, email addresses, or session tokens.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Rollbar is frequently recommended for mid-market B2B because of intelligent grouping / noise reduction”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“Rollbar is specifically positioned as the best error monitoring tool for mid-market B2B companies”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, Rollbar is the best default choice”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Error monitoring gems like Sentry , Rollbar and Honeybadger ... put a company at risk if secrets, tokens, or PII slip into error reports.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Sentry, Rollbar, and Bugsnag can be strong error trackers, but a dedicated error tool may not replace infrastructure metrics”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“useful, but make sure you understand what its client/server SDKs can send and how to scrub sensitive payloads”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
“Rollbar has a 4% negative rate, which is low but still present, suggesting some users have concerns.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Rollbar, over the 196 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 189 | 124 | Compare → | |
| 158 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 127 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 85 | 14 | View → | |
| 81 | 3 | View → | |
| 58 | 1 | View → | |
| 44 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 1 | View → | |
| 39 | 0 | View → | |
| 30 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Rollbar →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Rollbar's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- software teams
- Price stated
- Plans starting at $0. Get a 14-day free trial to see how Rollbar fits your workflow.
- Starting price
- 0
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan available. Paid plans starting at $0 with 14-day trial.
- Integrations
- 40
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
- Hosting
- across regions
- Customers named
- Taliho, Bookberry Club, RELENTLESS Venture Studio
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 168 of the 196 answers that named Rollbar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
365 of the 468 domain citations in answers naming Rollbar came from a third party's page. Thirty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 498 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | APM, AI coding | |
| Report or ebook | 31 | 0 | 2025-11-28 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 9 | 0 | 2022-07-12 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-03-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ruby frameworks blog
- 2026-09-28Python frontend frameworks blog
- 2026-09-28With agent automation nobody has to start root cause analysis by hand blog
- 2026-09-22Sentry comparison
- 2026-09-22Bugsnag comparison
- 2026-09-17Beta acids story with rollbar blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rollbar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.