New Relic Errors Inbox is an error and crash monitoring product from New Relic · newrelic.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Sentry is first at 76%.
Sentry is first at 76%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Sentry is first at 61%.
“Teams already using New Relic | Brings errors from APM, browser, mobile, serverless, and OpenTelemetry monitoring into a shared triage inbox.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Datadog or New Relic when error monitoring must be part of a larger infrastructure and observability program.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose New Relic if you want broader observability and error tracking as part of a single platform.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose New Relic for large enterprise observability where budget isn't the primary constraint.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Datadog or New Relic initially”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“New Relic (85% negative rate)”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“avoiding enterprise-only bloat from tools like Datadog or New Relic unless you need full APM”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Typically more expensive and complex to set up than dedicated error tools like Sentry.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as New Relic Errors Inbox, over the 95 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 62 | View → | |
| 93 | 2 | View → | |
| 81 | 4 | View → | |
| 74 | 2 | View → | |
| 41 | 9 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | View → | |
| 30 | 0 | View → | |
| 30 | 0 | View → | |
| 29 | 1 | View → | |
| 21 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of New Relic Errors Inbox →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on New Relic Errors Inbox's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 77 of the 95 answers that named New Relic Errors Inbox and are not a share of its labels.
198 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming New Relic Errors Inbox came from a third party's page. Eighteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |