Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Developer platform › ASPM › Snyk vs Wiz
Application security posture management · November 2026 Edition

Snyk vs Wiz

One of fourteen models named Snyk first on the direct prompt; one named Wiz. Snyk was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Wiz by eleven and Snyk carries 34 labels and Wiz 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Snyk

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Wiz

criticized challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3424A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Snyk reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Aikido Security was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Aikido Security vs Snyk · Aikido Security vs Wiz · DefectDojo vs Snyk

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application security posture management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SnykFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWiz
Direct112 against Wiz
Paraphrase111 against Snyk
Comparative021 against Snyk
Budget-constrained103 against Wiz
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Snyk · 2 against Wiz
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Snyk and Wiz stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Snyk Wiz first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Snyk on the left and Wiz on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Snyk and Wiz stood in it.

Snyk first, Wiz not the choice

1 of 14 modelsWiz was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Aikido Security, Snyk alternatives: Cycode ASPM, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud

Wiz first, Snyk not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSnyk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXWiz alternatives: Aikido Security, Apiiro, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, OX Security

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniArmorCode alternatives: Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Phoenix Security, Wiz
Perplexity SonarAikido Security alternatives: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Wiz
Grok 4.20Aikido Security alternatives: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk
Llama 4 MaverickAikido Security alternatives: DefectDojo, Snyk
Qwen 3.7 FlashAikido Security alternatives: Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, Jit, OX Security, Snyk
Muse Glimmer 30BAikido Security alternatives: DefectDojo, Snyk

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido Security alternatives: Cycode ASPM, Jit
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security alternatives: ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk AppRisk
Mistral SmallAikido Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashAikido Security alternatives: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM
Kimi K2Aikido Security, Cycode ASPM alternatives: ArmorCode, Legit Security
GPT-6 LunaArmorCode alternatives: Cycode ASPM, GitLab Ultimate

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Snyk leads by two points.
Snyk2%#4 of 14
Wiz0%#9 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Snyk leads by two points.
Snyk6%#5 of 14
Wiz4%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Wiz leads at enterprise.
Wiz11%#5 of 12
Snyk0%#12 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Snyk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid scanner add-ons (e.g., basic features from Snyk or Checkmarx)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend starting with Snyk if your team is developer-centric” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall Choice: Snyk ... Start with a pilot using Snyk.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best "Freemium" Platform: Snyk ... Snyk is the industry leader” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Wiz

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
Aikido Security vs SnykAikido Security vs WizDefectDojo vs SnykDefectDojo vs WizCycode ASPM vs SnykCycode ASPM vs WizArmorCode vs SnykArmorCode vs WizSnyk vs ApiiroSnyk vs Legit SecurityWiz vs ApiiroWiz vs Legit SecurityAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full ASPM standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.