ArmorCode is an application security posture management product that acts as an orchestration and governance layer across multiple security tools · armorcode.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Aikido Security is first at 81%.
Aikido Security is first at 40%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: Checkmarx One ASPM has 17%.
“If you need broad scanner aggregation and workflow automation on a controlled budget: ArmorCode. Strong integration count and lifecycle management”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Short answer: ArmorCode—if by ASPM you mean an independent layer that pulls findings from the security tools you already use”GPT-6 Luna · Direct question · first choice
“my default pick would be ArmorCode unless you already have a strong reason to standardize on another vendor”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · first choice
“Choose a Pure-Play (like ArmorCode or Phoenix) if your organization is struggling with "Too Many Alerts"”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Multiple AI models explicitly recommend avoiding these for smaller organizations due to high costs and complexity.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“High criticism rate (around 74%, with many "hard negative" labels)... overly complex for non-large orgs”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“enterprise-grade ASPM platforms like ArmorCode, Cycode, and Apiiro may have pricing models that are not suitable for small or mid-sized businesses”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“flagged certain early-stage or niche ASPM aggregators (e.g., Apiiro, ArmorCode in specific contexts) with higher "negative rates" or criticism”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as ArmorCode, over the 140 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 92 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 70 | 6 | View → | |
| 58 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 58 | 1 | View → | |
| 56 | 41 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 42 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of ArmorCode →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on ArmorCode's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 135 of the 140 answers that named ArmorCode and are not a share of its labels.
447 of the 489 domain citations in answers naming ArmorCode came from a third party's page. Forty-two were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 192 | 6 | 2026-09-15 | ASPM, CSPM | |
| Podcast or video | 126 | 0 | 2025-01-29 | ASPM, SAST | |
| News or press | 22 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | ASPM | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ASPM, UEM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 4 | 2026-09-02 | ASPM | |
| Comparison | 16 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | ASPM, SOAR | |
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2025-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 3 | 2026-09-16 | ASPM | |
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2025-05-05 |
Every page armorcode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.