Secure code training for enterprise buyers
Asked as “secure code training platform”, and as “developer security training”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
62%
Clear leader
62Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform13SecureFlag10Security Journey15others
62% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform held the lead, +25 points on 37%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SecureFlag25%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 26% → 25%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform (38%) replaces SecureFlag (26% then, 12% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%Clear leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
SecureFlag25%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 26% → 25%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform (38%) replaces SecureFlag (26% then, 12% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%Clear leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%16%73endorsed leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.37% → 62%
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%16%73endorsed leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.37% → 62%02SecureFlag13%5%55accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 22% → 13%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 13%
SecureFlag13%5%55accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 22% → 13%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 13%03
Security Journey10%13%47accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 18% → 10%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 10%
Security Journey10%13%47accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 18% → 10%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 10%04
AppSecEngineer6%7%29accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
AppSecEngineer6%7%29accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05
Checkmarx Codebashing2%31%26criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Checkmarx Codebashing2%31%26criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06
Veracode Security Labs0%12%32accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Veracode Security Labs0%12%32accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Immersive Labs0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Immersive Labs0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs SecureFlagSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Snyk LearnSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs SafeStack Academy
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Security JourneySecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs AppSecEngineerSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Veracode Security LabsSecureFlag vs Snyk LearnSecureFlag vs SafeStack AcademySecureFlag vs Security JourneySecureFlag vs AppSecEngineerSecureFlag vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecureFlag vs Veracode Security LabsSnyk Learn vs SafeStack AcademySnyk Learn vs Security JourneySnyk Learn vs AppSecEngineerSnyk Learn vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSnyk Learn vs Veracode Security LabsSafeStack Academy vs Security JourneySafeStack Academy vs AppSecEngineerSafeStack Academy vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSafeStack Academy vs Veracode Security LabsSecurity Journey vs AppSecEngineerSecurity Journey vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecurity Journey vs Veracode Security LabsAppSecEngineer vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoAppSecEngineer vs Veracode Security LabsOWASP Secure Coding Dojo vs Veracode Security Labs
One product takes 62% of first choices here, so the chart would put six markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform16%
12 of 73 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“large enterprises should be cautious about or avoid the following secure code training platforms... "fake scenarios," "shitty code samples," a "confusing interface"” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Security Journey13%
6 of 47 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“often compared unfavorably in bake-offs and has a higher-than-average negative label rate (6 out of 48 labels negative)” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Checkmarx Codebashing31%
8 of 26 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Checkmarx Codebashing uses custom pricing only” Claude Haiku 4.5, budget prompt
Veracode Security Labs12%
4 of 32 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“This platform is a strong candidate for caution due to integration and cost issues.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 912 links across 169 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 93 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G239 answers · 75 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Secure Code Warrior39 answers · 57 citations · 13 models
publisher (Gane)35 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Security Journey33 answers · 57 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SourceForge31 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AppSecEngineer28 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · RansomLeak26 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SecureFlag24 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Veracode23 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SecureCodingHub22 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best secure code training platform”, “secure code training platform”, “secure code training platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform securecodewarrior.com | 62% | 179 | 2,802 | 7 | 2 | |||
| SecureFlag secureflag.com | 13% | 135 | 480 | 0 | 935 | $94 | 8 | 8 |
| Security Journey securityjourney.com | 10% | 103 | 390 | 8 | 1,490 | 10 | 5 | |
| AppSecEngineer appsecengineer.com | 6% | 53 | 50 | 0 | 1,849 | 0 | ||
| Checkmarx checkmarx.com Checkmarx Codebashing 2% | 2% | 47 | 30 | 1 | 54,982 company | 61 | 3 | |
| SANS sans.org SANS Developer Security Training 2% | 2% | 26 | 201,000 | 2,165,150 | 703,543 company | 81 | ||
| Veracode veracode.com Veracode 2%, Veracode Security Labs 0%, Veracode eLearning 0% | 2% | 64 | 4,400 | 194 | 12,543 | 17 | 6 | |
| Herd Security | 2% | |||||||
| Zoho Fortify | 2% | |||||||
| Immersive Labs immersivelabs.com | 0% | 44 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.secureflag.com, securecodewarrior.com, securityjourney.com, veracode.com). The first result for “best secure code training platform” is safestack.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best secure code training platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which developer security training would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade secure code training platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best secure code training platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a secure code training platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which secure code training platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AppSecEngineerAppSecEngineerHeldAppSecEngineerSecureFlagagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagThree alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlag, Security CompassFour alternatives
Kontra, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlag, Veracode Security LabsOne alternative
Security JourneyGPT-5.4 miniSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSANS Developer Security Training, SecureFlagChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecureFlagagainst: OWASP Secure Coding Dojono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, SecureFlagTwo alternatives
Codebashing, Security JourneyOne alternative
Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformGemini 3.5 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldagainst: SANS Developer Security CoursesSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: TryHackMe
Six alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Hack The Box, Immersive Labs, SecureFlag, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
AppSec Engineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFive alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, Hack The Box for Business, Immersive Labs, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsPerplexity SonarSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformAppSecEngineerChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagSecurity Journeyagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs
Two alternatives
AppSecEngineer, SecureFlagThree alternatives
SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, VeracodeFour alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Avatao, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsOne alternative
AppSecEngineerGrok 4.20Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, OWASP Juice Shop, Security Shepherd, crAPISecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Avatao, Checkmarx CodebashingSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journeyagainst: Kontra, OWASP Juice Shop, SKF, Security Shepherdagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, Inspired eLearning, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Four alternatives
Immersive Labs, KnowBe4, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
OWASP resources, OpenSSF Secure Software Fundamentals Course, SANS Developer Security Training, Veracode Security LabsOne alternative
Immersive LabsThree alternatives
Immersive Labs, SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
Immersive Labs, SafeStack Academy, SecureFlagMistral SmallSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagSecureFlag, Security JourneyChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecureFlagno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Two alternatives
SecureCodingHub, Security JourneyTwo alternatives
SANS Developer Security Training, SecureCodingHubSix alternatives
Avatao, Checkmarx Codebashing, Immersive Labs, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyDeepSeek V4 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldagainst: SecureFlag, Snyk LearnSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: SANS Security AwarenessCheckmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: SecureFlagno first choiceagainst: OWASP Secure Coding Dojoagainst: AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, KnowBe4, SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, Wombat
Two alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyTwo alternatives
Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsLlama 4 MaverickSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceChangedno first choiceSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Three alternatives
Avatao, SecureFlag, Veracode Security LabsQwen 3.7 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs
Three alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Kontra, SANS Developer Security TrainingTwo alternatives
AppSecEngineer, SecureFlagThree alternatives
CrawlSecurity, Hacktiv8, SecureFlagThree alternatives
Credo Labs, Pluralsight, UdemyKimi K2Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Snyk LearnSecurity Journeyagainst: AppSecEngineerSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, KnowBe4, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, Synopsys eLearning, Veracode Security Labs
Two alternatives
Immersive Labs, SecureFlagThree alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, SANS Developer Security Training, Veracode eLearningSix alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Immersive Labs, KnowBe4, SecureFlag, Security JourneyOne alternative
Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformThree alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Immersive Labs, Security JourneyGLM 4.7 FlashXSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, Veracode Security Labs
Three alternatives
AppSecEngineer, SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
SANS "Secure Your Code at the Source", Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyTwo alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Security JourneyMiniMax M2.5Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneySecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, VeracodeChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHerd Securityno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, CMD+CTRL, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Three alternatives
Immersive Labs, SecureFlag, Security Compass SSPTwo alternatives
OpenSSF Secure Software Fundamentals, SANS Security AwarenessFive alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Codebashing, Immersive Labs, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
OffSec Learn Enterprise, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagGPT-6 LunaSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldagainst: Snyk LearnSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagZoho Fortifyno first choiceagainst: OWASP Secure Coding Dojo
One alternative
SecureFlagOne alternative
SecureFlagThree alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, Kontra, Security JourneyOne alternative
SecureFlagMuse Glimmer 30BSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Two alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
SANS Developer Security Training, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
Immersive Labs Secure SDLC / App Security Training, SANS Workforce Security and Risk Training / SANS Secure Coding, Veracode eLearningThree alternatives
HTB Academy for Business, Immersive Labs, SecureFlagBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 12 | 67 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:16 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 7 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 16 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 6 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:35 | yes | 20 | 79 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 20 | 58 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:50 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 22 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:53 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 22 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:48 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:07 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:59 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:05 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:09 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 2 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:00 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 7 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 12 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 18 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:13 | yes | 21 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 24 | 77 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 18 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx Codebashing
SANS read as SANS Developer Security Training
SANS (SEC522 & Cyber Ranges) read as SANS Developer Security Training
SANS Institute Developer Security Training read as SANS Developer Security Training
SafeStack read as SafeStack Academy
Secure Code Warrior read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Secure Code Warrior (SCW) read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Veracode Secure Code Training read as Veracode Security Labs
Veracode eLearning / Secure Code Training read as Veracode eLearning
Unresolved, counted raw
AppSec Engineer
Codebashing, part of Checkmarx
CrawlSecurity
Credo Labs
GoSecure
HTB Academy for Business
Hack The Box for Business
Hacktiv8
Herd Security
Immersive Labs Secure SDLC / App Security Training
NIST's Secure Software Development Framework
OffSec Learn Enterprise
Pragmatic Web Security
SANS "Secure Your Code at the Source"
SANS Developer Security Courses
SANS Workforce Security and Risk Training / SANS Secure Coding
Wombat
Zoho Fortify
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.