Veracode Security Labs is a secure code training platform that teaches developers application security practices within the software development lifecycle · veracode.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
SecureFlag is first at 25%.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is first at 38%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is first at 62%.
“SANS and Veracode are both excellent choices”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Best For: Teams already standardized on Veracode scanning who want training that aligns with their existing tooling.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for: Existing Veracode customers wanting training that complements their scanning and remediation workflows.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Veracode Security Labs or Checkmarx Codebashing if your organization already uses Veracode or Checkmarx”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Paid enterprise platforms like Secure Code Warrior, Veracode Security Labs, or Immersive Labs are highly rated for depth and integration but often start at thousands of dollars annually”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“they can feel more bolted-on than dedicated platforms like SCW, and pricing may be higher for mid-market”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
“Described as a "high-cost, high-friction" option rather than a quality issue per se.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Veracode Security Labs, over the 69 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | 38 | Compare → | |
| 36 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Veracode Security Labs →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Veracode Security Labs's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 64 of the 69 answers that named Veracode Security Labs and are not a share of its labels.
219 of the 280 domain citations in answers naming Veracode Security Labs came from a third party's page. Thirty-two were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |