Secure code training · RankedCheckmarx Codebashing
Checkmarx Codebashing is a secure code training product from Checkmarx · checkmarx.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
SecureFlag is first at 25%.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is first at 38%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is first at 62%.
Why models recommend it
“SafeStack Academy and Checkmarx Codebashing are the most frequently recommended alternatives.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
“Short, gamified lessons integrated with tools such as Checkmarx and developer workflows.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for Micro-Learning & Low Developer Interruption: Checkmarx Codebashing”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · alternative
“Best for: Micro-learning embedded directly into developer workflows.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“they can feel more bolted-on than dedicated platforms like SCW, and pricing may be higher for mid-market”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
“Be cautious if your organization does not already use the associated security tool.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Users have reported account configuration issues that required workarounds”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Checkmarx Codebashing, over the 51 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 27 | View → | |
| 31 | 9 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 24 | 1 | View → | |
| 18 | 2 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Checkmarx Codebashing →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Checkmarx Codebashing's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- developers
- Free plan or trial
- Get your free custom demo now
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
- Also from Checkmarx
- Checkmarx ASPM, Checkmarx DAST, Checkmarx One, Checkmarx One ASPM, Checkmarx SCA
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 47 of the 51 answers that named Checkmarx Codebashing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
217 of the 234 domain citations in answers naming Checkmarx Codebashing came from a third party's page. Seventeen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |