Index › IT › Developer platform › Secure code training › Snyk Learn vs Veracode Security Labs
Secure code training · November 2026 Edition

Snyk Learn vs Veracode Security Labs

Zero of fourteen models named Snyk Learn first on the direct prompt; zero named Veracode Security Labs. Snyk Learn was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Veracode Security Labs by twelve and Snyk Learn carries 19 labels and Veracode Security Labs 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Snyk Learn

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Veracode Security Labs

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%35%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1923A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Snyk Learn reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Snyk Learn · Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Veracode Security Labs · SecureFlag vs Snyk Learn

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the secure code training page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Snyk LearnFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVeracode Security Labs
Direct001 against Veracode Security Labs
Paraphrase11
Comparative00
Budget-constrained301 against Veracode Security Labs
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Snyk Learn · 6 against Veracode Security Labs
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Snyk Learn and Veracode Security Labs were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 62 answers naming Snyk Learn and the 69 naming Veracode Security Labs. In those answers Veracode Security Labs took the first choice zero times and Snyk Learn two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Snyk Learn and Veracode Security Labs stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Snyk Learn Veracode Security Labs first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Snyk Learn on the left and Veracode Security Labs on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Snyk Learn and Veracode Security Labs stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: SecureFlag, Security Journey, Snyk Learn
Llama 4 MaverickSecureFlag alternatives: Avatao, ImmersiveLabs, KnowBe4, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: AppSecEngineer, Avatao, SecureFlag
GPT-5.4 miniSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: AppSec Education Platform, Avatao, SafeStack Academy, SecureFlag
Gemini 3.5 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Kontra, SecureFlag, Security Journey
Perplexity SonarSecureFlag alternatives: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Mistral SmallSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: SecureFlag, Security Journey
DeepSeek V4 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: SecureFlag, Security Journey
Qwen 3.7 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: Hack The Box Academy, Pluralsight
Kimi K2Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: Avatao, Immersive Labs, Security Journey
GLM 4.7 FlashXSecureFlag alternatives: AppSecEngineer, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
MiniMax M2.5Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: SafeStack Academy, Security Journey
GPT-6 LunaSecureFlag alternatives: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Muse Glimmer 30BSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform alternatives: Checkmarx Codebashing, SafeStack Academy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Snyk Learn leads by twelve points.
Snyk Learn12%#3 of 11
Veracode Security Labs0%#9 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Snyk Learn leads by six points.
Snyk Learn8%#3 of 13
Veracode Security Labs2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Snyk Learn0%#– of 7
Veracode Security Labs0%#6 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Snyk Learn

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Avoid adopting it as a complete standalone program if your team needs broad, structured training, assessments, or substantial hands-on labs.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Snyk Learn (if you already use Snyk for vulnerability scanning) or Security Journey (for budget flexibility)” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best fit on a very tight budget: Snyk Learn. It offers free secure-coding lessons, learning paths, quizzes, and certificates.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Snyk Learn if free or low-cost foundational training is sufficient” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Veracode Security Labs

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Paid enterprise platforms like Secure Code Warrior, Veracode Security Labs, or Immersive Labs are highly rated for depth and integration but often start at thousands of dollars annually” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“they can feel more bolted-on than dedicated platforms like SCW, and pricing may be higher for mid-market” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“SANS and Veracode are both excellent choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Teams already standardized on Veracode scanning who want training that aligns with their existing tooling.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Existing Veracode customers wanting training that complements their scanning and remediation workflows.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.