Source control hosting
Asked as “source control hosting platform”, and as “Git hosting service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
78%
Clear leader
78GitHub16GitLab06Bitbucket
78% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.GitHub held the lead, +8 points on 70%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
GitHub86%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 72% → 86%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub78%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseGitHub68%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
GitHub86%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 72% → 86%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketGitHub78%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseGitHub68%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 54% → 68%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GitHub78%10%86endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.70% → 78%
GitHub78%10%86endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 70% → 78%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.70% → 78%02
GitLab16%11%85accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 21% → 16%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 16%
GitLab16%11%85accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 21% → 16%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 16%03
Bitbucket6%25%80criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Bitbucket6%25%80criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
05
Azure DevOps0%21%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Azure DevOps0%21%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Azure Repos0%15%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Azure Repos0%15%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%04
Gitea0%10%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Gitea0%10%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Codeberg0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Codeberg0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Forgejo0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Forgejo0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
One product takes 78% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bitbucket25%
20 of 80 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Bitbucket Server (the self-hosted on-premise product discontinued by Atlassian in Feb 2024) are either completely shut down or no longer supported.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
GitHub10%
9 of 86 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“GitHub is a platform that some people recommend avoiding due to various concerns such as privacy risks, copyright issues, and being owned by Microsoft” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
SourceForge100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“It is generally considered risky for both open-source and closed-source projects” Mistral Small, negative prompt
GitLab11%
9 of 85 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Hosting your own Git platform using open-source tools like Gitea, Forgejo, Gogs, or GitLab Community Edition is great for data privacy, but comes with operational risks” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 698 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 56 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · GitHub28 answers · 50 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Bitbucket19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitLab16 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · GitHub12 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · SourceForge10 answers · 15 citations · 5 models
9 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
18 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platform”, “source control hosting platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub github.com | 78% | 216 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | 42,019,137 | $81 | 14 | |
| GitLab gitlab.com | 16% | 196 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 | $884 | 66 | 4 |
| Bitbucket bitbucket.org | 6% | 181 | 33,100 | 1,560 | 22,601 | |||
| Gitea gitea.com Gitea 0%, Gitea/Forgejo 0% | 0% | 62 | 9,900 | 193 | 7,814 | |||
| Azure parent site Azure DevOps 0%, Azure Repos 0% | 0% | 162 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Forgejo forgejo.org | 0% | 40 | 5,400 | 55 | 2,987 | 4 | ||
| Codeberg codeberg.org | 0% | 29 | 8,100 | 33 | 32,214 | |||
| SourceHut | 0% | 590 | 4 | |||||
| Perforce Helix Core perforce.com | 0% | 13 | 260 | 11 | 161,450 | $2,860 | 100 | |
| GitLab self-hosted | 0% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (about.gitlab.com, en.wikipedia.org, reddit.com). The first result for “best source control hosting platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best source control hosting platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Git hosting service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top source control hosting platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best source control hosting platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a source control hosting platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which source control hosting platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceGitHubChangedGitHubGitHub, GitLabno first choiceagainst: GitHub, Gitea
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaThree alternatives
Bitbucket, Forgejo, GiteaGPT-5.4 miniGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubagainst: SourceForgeGitHubno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitLab
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabGemini 3.5 FlashGitHubagainst: Azure DevOpsGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, CodePlex, Forgejo, GitLab, Gitea, Gitee, Gitorious, Gogs, Google Code, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, GitLab, Perforce Helix CoreFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitLab, GiteaPerplexity SonarGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubagainst: GitLabno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, SourceHut
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, Gitea/Forgejo, Perforce Helix CoreTwo alternatives
Forgejo, GiteaGrok 4.20GitHubagainst: BitbucketGitLabChangedGitHubagainst: AWS CodeCommitGitHubagainst: BeanstalkGitHub, GitLabagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHubFour alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Azure Repos, BitbucketMistral SmallGitHubno first choiceChangedGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucketagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, SourceForge
Five alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitLab, GiteaThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHubagainst: Azure DevOpsGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: SourceForgeGitHubagainst: Bitbucketno first choiceagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitorious, Google Code, Launchpad, SourceForge
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitLab, Gitea/ForgejoOne alternative
GitLabLlama 4 MaverickGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: GitHub
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabQwen 3.7 FlashGitHub, GitLabGitHubChangedno first choiceGitHubGitHub, GitLabagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Launchpad, SourceForge
One alternative
BitbucketTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaOne alternative
BitbucketKimi K2GitHubGitHubHeldagainst: BitbucketGitHubGitHubGitHub, GitLabagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab
Two alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitLabOne alternative
GitLabFour alternatives
AWS CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaOne alternative
BitbucketGLM 4.7 FlashXBitbucketGitLabChangedagainst: BitbucketGitHubagainst: Gerrit, SourceForgeBitbucketagainst: GitLabno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Three alternatives
Azure DevOps, GitHub, GitLabOne alternative
GitHubSix alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Codeberg, Forgejo, GitLab, GiteaThree alternatives
Forgejo, GitHub, GiteaMiniMax M2.5GitHubGitHubHeldGitHubBitbucket, GitLabno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucketagainst: Bitbucket, GitHub
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitLabThree alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLab, GiteaTwo alternatives
Codeberg, GitHubGPT-6 LunaGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubagainst: GitLabno first choiceagainst: AWS CodeCommit, Google Cloud Source Repositories, JetBrains Space, Launchpad Bazaar hosting
Two alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GitLab, GiteaTwo alternatives
Azure DevOps, BitbucketMuse Glimmer 30BGitHubGitHubHeldGitHubGitHubno first choiceagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge
One alternative
GitLabTwo alternatives
Bitbucket, GitLabFive alternatives
Azure DevOps, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Codeberg, GitLabFour alternatives
Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Forgejo, GiteaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:21 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:35 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:00 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 15 | 108 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:35 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:40 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:17 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 15 | 77 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:17 | no | 0 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:02 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 6 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:25 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:00 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:31 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 25 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:39 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:45 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:23 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:18 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 1 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:28 | yes | 25 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Atlassian read as Bitbucket
GitHub Enterprise Server read as GitHub
GitLab SaaS read as GitLab
GitLab Self-Managed read as GitLab
GitLab Ultimate read as GitLab
Perforce read as Perforce Helix Core
Self-hosted GitLab read as GitLab
Unresolved, counted raw
Beanstalk
GitLab self-hosted
Launchpad Bazaar hosting
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe (VSS)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.