Container and Kubernetes security
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 72 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · Falco 21%
24Trivy21Falco15Kubescape40others
24% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Trivy held the lead, +2 points on 22%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Trivy38%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy24%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Prisma Cloud31%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Trivy38%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy24%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprisePrisma Cloud31%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Trivy24%20%51accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 24%
Trivy24%20%51accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 24%02
Falco21%2%43accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 15% → 21%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 21%
Falco21%2%43accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 15% → 21%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 21%03
Kubescape15%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%
Kubescape15%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 15%04
Sysdig Secure8%14%58accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 20% → 8%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 8%
Sysdig Secure8%14%58accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 20% → 8%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 8%05
Wiz7%25%40criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 7%
Wiz7%25%40criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 7%06
Aikido Security7%0%11accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
Aikido Security7%0%11accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%07
Snyk Container6%11%35accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
Snyk Container6%11%35accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%08
Aqua Security3%20%49accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 8% → 3%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 3%
Aqua Security3%20%49accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 8% → 3%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 3%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Prisma Cloud0%46%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Prisma Cloud0%46%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Anchore0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Anchore0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Kyverno0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Kyverno0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Microsoft Defender for Containers0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Microsoft Defender for Containers0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Orca Security0%9%11accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Orca Security0%9%11accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Trivy vs WizTrivy vs Aikido SecurityTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs Aqua SecurityFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs Sysdig SecureFalco vs WizFalco vs Aikido SecurityFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs Aqua SecurityKubescape vs Sysdig SecureKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Aikido SecurityKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs Aqua SecuritySysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Aikido SecuritySysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs Aqua SecurityWiz vs Aikido SecurityWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs Aqua SecurityAikido Security vs Snyk ContainerAikido Security vs Aqua SecuritySnyk Container vs Aqua Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Trivy24%
Trivy24%02Falco21%
Falco21%03Kubescape15%
Kubescape15%04Sysdig Secure8%
Sysdig Secure8%05Wiz7%
Wiz7%06Aikido Security7%
Aikido Security7%07Snyk Container6%
Snyk Container6%08Aqua Security3%
Aqua Security3%09Microsoft Defender for Containers0%
Microsoft Defender for Containers0%10Kyverno0%
Kyverno0%11Orca Security0%
Orca Security0%12Anchore0%
Anchore0%13Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%14Prisma Cloud0%
Prisma Cloud0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Wiz25%
10 of 40 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid these for limited budgets: Enterprise platforms like Wiz” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Prisma Cloud46%
19 of 41 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid high-end like Prisma Cloud or Datadog unless you need their full observability suites, as they scale expensively.” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Trivy20%
10 of 51 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for most mid-market cases: Pure open-source like Trivy alone (great scanner but lacks platform features)” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Sysdig Secure14%
8 of 58 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid these for limited budgets: Enterprise platforms like ... Sysdig Secure” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 778 links across 197 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
28 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GitHub22 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Chainguard20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · OX16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Safeguard15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CyberPress14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zenarmor14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks13 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivy trivy.dev | 24% | 248 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Falco falco.org | 21% | 119 | 27,100 | 4,242 | 383 | |||
| Kubescape kubescape.io | 15% | 55 | 260 | 1 | 150 | |||
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 8% | 252 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Wiz wiz.io | 7% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 7% | 7% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 6% | 6% | 111 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Aqua aquasec.com Aqua Security 3% | 3% | 214 | 880 | 32 | 7,831 company | 0 | 2 | |
| Mend.io mend.io | 3% | 13 | 210 | 11 | 15,059 | 7 | ||
| Kube-bench kubernetes.ae | 1% | 14 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (ox.security, paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido SecurityKubescapeChangedno first choiceFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, Wizno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Harbor, Ingress NGINX, Trivy
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Kyverno, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig Secure, TrivyOne alternative
Aikido SecurityGPT-5.4 miniSysdig SecureTrivyChangedMicrosoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig SecureFalco, Trivyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureGemini 3.5 FlashWizWizHeldAqua Security, Sysdig SecureFalco, Trivyagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizSnyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wizagainst: CoreOS/Quay Clair, Portshift, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Tenable Legacy Container Security
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Datadog Cloud Security, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Datadog Cloud Security Management, Falco, Kyverno, Sysdig Secure, TrivySix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Trivy, WizEight alternatives
AWS, Aikido Security, Azure, Docker Scout, Google Cloud, Grype + Syft, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerPerplexity SonarAikido Securityagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, TrivyKubescapeChangedPrisma CloudTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Falco, Grype, Kyverno, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, Wiz
Two alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Sysdig Secure, TrivySeven alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SentinelOne Singularity, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizSix alternatives
Aikido Security, Calico, Falco, Kubescape, Kyverno, Snyk ContainerGrok 4.20Wizagainst: Datadog Cloud Security Management, Prisma Cloud, TrivyKubescapeChangedagainst: Prisma CloudSysdig Secure, WizFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Snyk Container, Trivyagainst: Anchore, Aqua Security, Clair, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, Wiz
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureSix alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Gatekeeper, Open Policy Agent, Sysdig Secure, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Calico, Docker Scout, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerMistral SmallUpwindTrivyChangedAqua SecurityAikido Security, Guardrailsno first choiceagainst: Docker Engine, Kubernetes, Mesosphere DC/OS, TanStack, Trivy
Three alternatives
Datadog Cloud Security Management, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Falco, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizTwo alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureDeepSeek V4 FlashSysdig Secureagainst: Prisma CloudKubescapeChangedSysdig Secure, WizFalco, Kubescape, Trivyagainst: Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, WizAqua Security, Sysdig Secureagainst: Prisma Cloudagainst: Corelight, OX Security, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Tenable Legacy Cloud Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Sentry, Trivy, Wiz, Xygeni
One alternative
Aqua SecuritySix alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kyverno, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk ContainerTwo alternatives
Calico, Snyk ContainerTwo alternatives
Snyk Container, WizLlama 4 MaverickTrivyno first choiceChangedno first choiceTigerGateno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Falco, Mend.io, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Falco, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, TrivyQwen 3.7 FlashAikido Security, Snyk ContainerFalco, KubescapeChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Prisma CloudPalo Alto Networks – Prisma CloudFalco, Snyk Container, Trivyagainst: CrowdStrike, Prisma CloudSnyk Containeragainst: Prisma Cloud, Wizagainst: Anchore Engine, Aqua Security, Clair, Grype, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, Wiz
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Mend.io, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Fairwinds Platinum, Portainer, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Kube-bench, KubeLinter, TigerGateTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureKimi K2Aikido SecurityFalco, Kubescape, TrivyChangedWizagainst: Snyk ContainerFalco, Kubescape, TrivyWizagainst: Chainguard, CoreOS Container Linux, Minimus, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security Sensor, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, TanStack, Tenable Legacy Container Security, Trivy, Wiz
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig Secure, WizSix alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Harbor, OPA/Gatekeeper, SUSE NeuVectorSix alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Lacework, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud Compute, Sysdig SecureGLM 4.7 FlashXMend.ioFalco, TrivyChangedPrisma Cloud, WizFalco, Kube-bench, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Broadcom Carbon Black EDR Container Mode, Chainguard, Cloudflare Containers, Darktrace, Docker Hub, Minimus, Orange Business Container Guard Service, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Wiz
Three alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizFour alternatives
Kube-bench, OPA/Gatekeeper, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, Falco, Qualys Container Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, TrivyTwo alternatives
Anchore, GuardrailsMiniMax M2.5Mend.ioFalco, Open Policy AgentChangedno first choiceFalco, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Docker Bench for Security
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Kube-bench, PortainerFive alternatives
Aqua Tracee, Grype, OPA/Gatekeeper, Snyk Container, SyftGPT-6 LunaSysdig SecureKubescapeChangedOrca Security, WizKubescapeno first choiceagainst: Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Tenable Legacy Container Security
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Containers, WizTwo alternatives
ARMO Platform, FalcoFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Falco, TrivyMuse Glimmer 30BAqua Security, Sysdig SecureFalco, Kubescape, TrivyChangedno first choiceFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Alcide, Minimus, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Tenable Legacy Container Security
One alternative
Microsoft Defender for ContainersThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureTen alternatives
Aqua Security, Chainguard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud Compute, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Calico, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:32 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 21 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 7 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:33 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:14 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:07 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:46 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:34 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 20 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 19 | 167 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 13 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:46 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:41 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:30 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:04 | no | 0 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 16 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:54 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:13 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:21 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 15 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:49 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Azure Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Datadog (Security modules) read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender for Cloud read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender for Cloud (Defender for Containers) read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Rapid7 Container Security (InsightVM feature) read as Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Rapid7 Container Security (InsightVM) read as Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Rapid7 Container Security in InsightVM read as Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS / StackRox) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (formerly StackRox) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
ARMO
Alcide
Aqua Tracee
Chainguard Containers
Cloudflare Containers
CoreOS Container Linux
CoreOS/Quay Clair
Deepfence
Docker Bench
Docker Engine
Docker Hardened Images
Echo
Fairwinds Platinum
Fedora CoreOS
Flatcar
Google Container Analysis
Kube-Hunter
Notary
Orange Business Container Guard Service (CGS)
Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud
Panoptica
Qualys Container Security Sensor
RapidFort Curated Images
RedHat Advanced Cluster Security
Tenable Legacy Cloud Security
Tigera Calico Cloud
Trend Micro Cloud One Sentry
Xygeni Security
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.