Container and Kubernetes security for enterprise buyers
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
31%
Contested · Sysdig Secure 22%
31Prisma Cloud22Sysdig Secure20Wiz27others
31% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Prisma Cloud held the lead, +6 points on 25%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Trivy38%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy24%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Prisma Cloud31%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Trivy38%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy24%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterprisePrisma Cloud31%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Prisma Cloud31%17%59endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 31%
Prisma Cloud31%17%59endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 31%02
Sysdig Secure22%9%69accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 22% → 22%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 22%
Sysdig Secure22%9%69accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 22% → 22%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 22%03
Wiz20%15%54accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 5% → 20%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.5% → 20%
Wiz20%15%54accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 5% → 20%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.5% → 20%04
Aqua Security14%8%59accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 22% → 14%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 14%
Aqua Security14%8%59accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 22% → 14%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 14%05
Snyk Container4%28%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Snyk Container4%28%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%06
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Microsoft Defender for Containers2%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Microsoft Defender for Containers2%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
Falco2%31%26criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Falco2%31%26criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Trivy0%39%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Trivy0%39%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Orca Security0%6%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Orca Security0%6%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Trivy vs WizTrivy vs Aikido SecurityTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs Aqua SecurityFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs Sysdig SecureFalco vs WizFalco vs Aikido SecurityFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs Aqua SecurityKubescape vs Sysdig SecureKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Aikido SecurityKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs Aqua SecuritySysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Aikido SecuritySysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs Aqua SecurityWiz vs Aikido SecurityWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs Aqua SecurityAikido Security vs Snyk ContainerAikido Security vs Aqua SecuritySnyk Container vs Aqua Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Prisma Cloud31%
Prisma Cloud31%02Sysdig Secure22%
Sysdig Secure22%03Wiz20%
Wiz20%04Aqua Security14%
Aqua Security14%05Snyk Container4%
Snyk Container4%06Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes2%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes2%07Microsoft Defender for Containers2%
Microsoft Defender for Containers2%08Falco2%
Falco2%09Orca Security0%
Orca Security0%10CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security0%11SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security0%
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security0%12Trivy0%
Trivy0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Snyk Container28%
10 of 36 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid per-developer models (like Snyk at enterprise tier) if you have thousands of developers” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Wiz15%
8 of 54 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid massive CNAPPs (like Wiz) if your primary need is simple vulnerability scanning, as the learning curve and resource cost may outweigh the benefits.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Prisma Cloud17%
10 of 59 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Reviewers frequently describe the platform as expensive, especially for smaller teams, and note that usage-based pricing can rise unexpectedly” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Trivy39%
9 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Standalone scanners such as Trivy or Grype as the entire program... They are poor substitutes for a complete enterprise control plane.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 905 links across 246 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G231 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OX23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Chainguard20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · CyberPress15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Cloudanix14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 31% | 31% | 440 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 | |||
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 22% | 252 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Wiz wiz.io | 20% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Aqua aquasec.com Aqua Security 14% | 14% | 214 | 880 | 32 | 7,831 company | 0 | 2 | |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 4% | 4% | 111 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security redhat.com Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 2% | 2% | 35 | 40 | 1 | 1,347,338 company | $281 | 117 | |
| Microsoft Defender parent site Microsoft Defender for Containers 2% | 2% | 43 | 18,100 | 3,525 | ||||
| Falco falco.org | 2% | 119 | 27,100 | 4,242 | 383 | |||
| RapidFort rapidfort.com | 2% | 3 | ||||||
| Sysdig CNAPP | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (ox.security). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aqua Security, Prisma Cloudno first choiceChangedno first choiceSysdig Secureagainst: OX Security, Qualysno first choiceagainst: Anchore, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, Wiz
Two alternatives
Orca Security, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for ContainersGPT-5.4 miniPrisma Cloud, WizRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for KubernetesChangedagainst: Falco, Kube-bench, Open Policy Agent, kube-linterno first choiceagainst: FalcoRapidFortno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, WizGemini 3.5 Flashno first choiceSysdig SecureChangedAqua Security, Prisma CloudWizagainst: GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk ContainerWizagainst: Amazon ECR scanning, Azure Container Registry
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Palo Alto Networks — Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, WizThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecurePerplexity SonarPrisma CloudAqua SecurityChangedagainst: Falco, Kubescape, TrivyPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma CloudMicrosoft Defender for Containersno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, Falco, Grype, Kyverno, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
Seven alternatives
Aqua Security, Checkmarx One, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizFour alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, WizFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
Prisma CloudGrok 4.20Prisma Cloud, Wizagainst: Snyk ContainerFalcoChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudPrisma Cloudagainst: Anchore, Falco, TrivySysdig Secureagainst: Lacework, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, SentinelOne Singularity, Snyk Container, Trivy, WizWizagainst: Falco, Kyverno, Trivyagainst: Docker Scout, Fidelis Halo, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Xygeni
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Gatekeeper, Grype, Kube-bench, Kyverno, SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
Aqua SecurityFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureMistral SmallPrisma CloudAqua Security, Sysdig SecureChangedPrisma CloudPrisma Cloud, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Container Repository
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Calico, Kubescape, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for KubernetesSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
Aqua SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashWizPrisma CloudChangedagainst: WizAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Docker Business, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizWizagainst: Snyk Containeragainst: Kyverno, McAfee, Open Policy Agent, Qualys Container Security, Tenable, Trellix, Tripwire, Trivy
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, WizThree alternatives
Chainguard, Falco, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureLlama 4 MaverickPrisma CloudAqua SecurityChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Docker Swarm, Mesos, Prisma Cloud
One alternative
SUSE SecurityQwen 3.7 FlashPrisma CloudAqua SecurityChangedPrisma CloudWizagainst: Docker Business, Snyk ContainerWizagainst: AWS Security Hub, Aqua Security, GCP Defender, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Snyk Container, WizThree alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Kubescape, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Chainguard, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureKimi K2Prisma CloudAqua Security, Prisma CloudChangedPrisma CloudAqua Securityagainst: Snyk Containerno first choiceagainst: Falco, Grype, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security, Trivy, Wiz
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, WizFive alternatives
Falco, Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper, Trivy, WizFive alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig Secure, WizGLM 4.7 FlashXPrisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureSysdig CNAPPChangedPrisma Cloudagainst: Snyk ContainerSysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, TanStack, Trivy, Wiz
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, WizFour alternatives
AccuKnox, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma CloudMiniMax M2.5Prisma Cloud, WizPrisma CloudChangedno first choiceSysdig Secureagainst: Aikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetesagainst: Checkmarx KICS
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureSix alternatives
Aqua Security, Cilium, Falco, Open Policy Agent, Sysdig Secure, TrivyTen alternatives
Anchre Enterprise, Aqua Security, Bitdefender GravityZone for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro Cloud One – Container Security, WizFive alternatives
Falco, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Trivy, WizGPT-6 LunaSysdig SecureSysdig SecureHeldno first choiceSysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Broadcom Carbon Black EDR Container Mode, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Tenable Legacy Container Security, Trend Vision One Container Security
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, WizTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, WizSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
AnchoreMuse Glimmer 30BPrisma CloudPrisma CloudHeldAqua Security, Prisma CloudSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Portainer, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
Docker BusinessBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:14 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:13 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:21 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:53 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:58 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:29 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:29 | yes | 24 | 102 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:24 | no | 0 | 83 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:25 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:12 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 25 | 75 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 5 | 97 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 23 | 89 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 18 | 93 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 24 | 109 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 25 | 89 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 20 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:02 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:49 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:33 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:19 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:20 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 11 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:15 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 23 | 98 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 24 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS ECR scanning read as Amazon ECR scanning
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Azure Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender for Cloud read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Rapid7 Container Security in InsightVM read as Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Red Hat (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS, formerly StackRox) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS / StackRox) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (for Kubernetes) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Snyk (Snyk Container + Cloud) read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Sysdig (with Falco) read as Sysdig Secure
Tenable.io Container Security read as Tenable Container Security
Tigera (Calico) read as Tigera Calico Enterprise
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Anchre Enterprise
Aqua Enforcer
Bitdefender GravityZone for Containers
Checkmarx KICS
Datree
Dockle
GCP Defender
Iron Bank
Mesos
Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks — Prisma Cloud
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes - RHACS
Red Hat Container Repository
SUSE Security
Sysdig CNAPP
kube-linter
kube‑bench
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.