Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Cloud and infrastructure › Container security › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Container and Kubernetes security for small business buyers

Name: AI model recommendations for container and kubernetes security for small business buyers, November 2026 Edition
Creator: Gane
Published: 2026-11-01
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.

Standing · first-choice share

38%

Trivy

Contested · Falco 22%

38Trivy22Falco13Kubescape27others

38% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Trivy held the lead, +16 points on 22%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Trivy38%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page Mid-market

Trivy24%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise

Prisma Cloud31%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026

Trivy4%68endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 22% → 38%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.22% → 38%

Falco4%55accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 12% → 22%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 22%

Kubescape0%28accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 19% → 13%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 13%

Snyk Container7%58accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 19% → 10%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 10%

Aikido Security28%25criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 5%

Kyverno0%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 1% → 3%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 3%

Sysdig Secure48%50criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 6% → 3%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 3%

Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Prisma Cloud71%38criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 0%

Aqua Security62%47criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 0%

Wiz48%31criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%

Microsoft Defender for Containers48%21criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%

Anchore27%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

Chainguard9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

Docker Scout7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

For buyers

Build your shortlist

Head to head

Trivy vs Falco Trivy vs Kubescape Trivy vs Sysdig Secure

Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%

Key

Trivy38%

Falco22%

Kubescape13%

Snyk Container10%

Aikido Security5%

Kyverno3%

Sysdig Secure3%

Docker Scout0%

Chainguard0%

Anchore0%

Wiz0%

Microsoft Defender for Containers0%

Aqua Security0%

Prisma Cloud0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Sysdig Secure

48%

24 of 50 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 4 hard negative

“Why to avoid: Sysdig is excellent for runtime security, but it typically uses a per-node or per-cluster pricing model” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

Aqua Security

62%

29 of 47 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 7 hard negative

“its traditional model relies heavily on a complex sidecar architecture... small engineering teams usually cannot spare time for” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

Prisma Cloud

71%

27 of 38 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 12 hard negative

“Prisma Cloud's pricing, starting at $9,000/year for 100 credits in the Business Edition, is on the expensive side for smaller organizations.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

Microsoft Defender for Containers

48%

10 of 21 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative

“Why to avoid/caution: While it is a top-rated tool, it is often criticized for being expensive for small to medium businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 796 links across 191 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

softwareadvice.com

35 answers · 44 citations · 11 models

g2.com

vendor site · G233 answers · 44 citations · 12 models

gbhackers.com

26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models

cyberpress.org

vendor site · CyberPress23 answers · 26 citations · 10 models

softwareadvice.co.uk

23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models

github.com

vendor site · GitHub22 answers · 39 citations · 8 models

chainguard.dev

vendor site · Chainguard20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models

capterra.com

18 answers · 20 citations · 9 models

expertinsights.com

17 answers · 18 citations · 7 models

checkmarx.com

vendor site · Checkmarx16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models

zenarmor.com

vendor site · Zenarmor15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

capterra.co.uk

14 answers · 16 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

g2.com/categories/container-security-tools/small-business

26 answers · 11 models

softwareadvice.co.uk/directory/4438/container-security/software

23 answers · 8 models

cyberpress.org/container-security-by-business-size-2

21 answers · 10 models

gbhackers.com/best-container-security-compared

21 answers · 9 models

softwareadvice.com/container-security/small-business

20 answers · 9 models

chainguard.dev/supply-chain-security-101/container-security-tools-a-buyers-…

18 answers · 9 models

softwareadvice.com/container-security

17 answers · 10 models

zenarmor.com/docs/network-security-tutorials/top-container-security-tools

15 answers · 9 models

capterra.co.uk/directory/32916/container-security/software

14 answers · 6 models

capterra.com/container-security-software

14 answers · 9 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Company and products	Share	Own site cited	Name searches, Google	AI search demand, est.	Organic visits	Paid search a month, est.	Google ads, last 30 days	Best Google position
Trivy trivy.dev	38%	248	5,400	182	3,093
Falco falco.org	22%	119	27,100	4,242	383
Kubescape kubescape.io	13%	55	260	1	150
Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 10%	10%	111	12,100	581	61,651 company		60
Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 5%	5%	326	2,400	51	6,442 company	$936	120
Kyverno kyverno.io	3%	32	1,900	34	1,137
SUSE NeuVector suse.com	3%	16	20	0	59,615		103	9
Sysdig Secure sysdig.com	3%	252	110	2	50,599	$1,067	4	9
ARMO Platform	2%
Docker Scout docker.com Docker Scout 0%, Docker Bench for Security 0%	0%	14	390	5	1,141,297		16

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ShowHide

ModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Aqua SecurityKyvernoChanged

Two alternatives

Falco, Kubewarden

against: OPA/GatekeeperTrivy

Three alternatives

Aikido Security, Falco, Snyk Container

against: AnchoreFalco, Trivy

Three alternatives

Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container

no first choiceagainst: Anchore, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Tenable

GPT-5.4 miniSysdig Secure

Two alternatives

Aqua Security, Snyk Container

FalcoChangedSnyk Container

Two alternatives

Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure

against: Prisma CloudTrivy

Two alternatives

Aikido Security, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Wizno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Check Point CloudGuard, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro Container Security

Gemini 3.5 FlashSnyk Container

Six alternatives

Amazon ECR scanning, Amazon GuardDuty, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Google Artifact Registry Vulnerability Scanning, Sysdig Secure, Trivy

against: WizARMO PlatformChanged

Four alternatives

Datadog Cloud Security Management, Kyverno, Trivy, Wiz

Snyk Container, Trivy

Two alternatives

Docker Scout, Grype + Syft

against: Sysdig SecureSUSE NeuVector, Trivy

Five alternatives

AWS, Azure, Falco, Google Cloud, Snyk Container

against: CrowdStrike, Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choice

Seven alternatives

Chainguard, Datadog Security, Grype, Orca Security, Snyk Container, Trivy, Wiz

against: AWS Security Hub, Anchore, Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Open Policy Agent, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro Cloud One

Perplexity SonarSnyk Container

Three alternatives

Falco, Kubescape, Trivy

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizKubescapeChanged

Three alternatives

Falco, Kyverno, Trivy

Aikido Security, Snyk Container

Three alternatives

Falco, Sysdig Secure, Trivy

against: Aqua Security, WizTrivy

Four alternatives

Aikido Security, Falco, Kyverno, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wizno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy

Grok 4.20Falco, Trivy

One alternative

Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizTrivyChanged

Three alternatives

Falco, Kubescape, Kyverno

Falco, Snyk Container, Trivy

Two alternatives

Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure

against: Aikido Security, Chainguard, Datadog Cloud Security Management, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, WizTrivy

Five alternatives

Aikido Security, Docker Scout, Falco, Grype, Guardrails

against: Datadog Cloud Security Management, Mend.io, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secureno first choice

Five alternatives

Aqua Security, Datadog Container Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz

against: Prisma Cloudagainst: Aikido Security, Aqua Security, Clair, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Trivy

Mistral SmallFalco, Trivy

Two alternatives

Kubescape, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureFalco, KubescapeChanged

Two alternatives

Kyverno, Trivy

Aikido Security, Snyk Container

Three alternatives

Chainguard, Sysdig Secure, Wiz

Falco, Trivy

One alternative

Snyk Container

no first choiceagainst: Mesosphere DC/OS

DeepSeek V4 FlashTrivy

Five alternatives

Docker Scout, Falco, Harbor, Kyverno, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizKubescapeChanged

Four alternatives

ARMO Platform, Falco, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Trivy

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureTrivy

Four alternatives

Aikido Security, Falco, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure

against: Aqua Security, WizFalco, Trivy

Four alternatives

Docker Bench for Security, Grype + Syft, Kubescape, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizFalco, Trivy

Three alternatives

Kyverno, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Wizagainst: Aikido Security, Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud

Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceFalco, Trivy

One alternative

Snyk Container

no first choicenothing named

Qwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Container

Three alternatives

Anchore, StackHawk, Trivy

against: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudTrivyChanged

Four alternatives

Falco, Kyverno, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Rancher

against: Open Policy AgentAikido Security, Snyk Container

Four alternatives

Anchore, Chainguard, Grype, Sysdig Secure

Trivy

Four alternatives

Docker Scout, Falco, Kyverno, Portainer Community Edition

against: Aqua Security, Open Policy Agent, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureAikido Security, Snyk Container

Five alternatives

Cloudanix, Endor Labs, Falco, Trivy, Wiz

against: Sysdig Secureagainst: Aqua Security, Broadcom Symphony, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trivy

Kimi K2Aikido Security

Five alternatives

Chainguard, Docker Security / Docker Scout, Falco, Snyk Container, Trivy

KubescapeChanged

Two alternatives

ARMO, Falco

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizFalco, Trivy

Two alternatives

Snyk Container, Wiz

against: Docker ScoutTrivy

Two alternatives

Falco, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, WizSnyk Container

Six alternatives

Aqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, Wiz

against: Aqua Security, Docker Business, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sysdig Secure

GLM 4.7 FlashXSnyk Container, Sysdig Secure

Four alternatives

Aqua Security, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Trivy

KubescapeChanged

Five alternatives

ARMO, Aqua Security, Falco, Portainer, Sysdig Secure

Snyk Container, Wiz

Two alternatives

Aikido Security, Sysdig Secure

Falco, SUSE NeuVector, Trivy

Three alternatives

Docker Bench for Security, Snyk Container, TigerGate

against: Microsoft Defender for Containersno first choice

Five alternatives

Docker Scout, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk Container, Trivy

against: Aikido Security, Checkmarx, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Vulnerability Management

MiniMax M2.5Trivy

Three alternatives

Aqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure

KyvernoChanged

Three alternatives

Falco, Kube-bench, Trivy

Aikido Security, Snyk Container

Two alternatives

Sysdig Secure, Wiz

against: Aqua SecurityTrivy

Five alternatives

Calico, Docker Scout, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk Container

against: Aqua Securityno first choice

Nine alternatives

Amazon GuardDuty, Aqua Security, Azure Defender for Containers, Google Security Command Center, Lacework, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure

against: Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz

GPT-6 LunaAikido Security

Two alternatives

Amazon Inspector, Trivy

against: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureKubescapeChanged

Two alternatives

ARMO, Trivy

Trivy

Four alternatives

Aqua Security, Docker Scout, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure

Trivy

Two alternatives

Docker Scout, GitLab's built-in container scanning

against: Falcono first choiceagainst: Minimus images/registry, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security, Tenable Legacy Container Security, Trend Vision One Container Security

Muse Glimmer 30BFalco, Trivy

Seven alternatives

AWS Container Insights, Aikido Security, Aqua Security, Google Cloud Container Security, Kubescape, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig Secure

Falco, KubescapeChanged

Four alternatives

Calico, Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper, Trivy

Falco, Trivy

Four alternatives

Aqua Security, Calico, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure

Falco, Kubescape, Trivy

Three alternatives

Aikido Security, Cilium, Kyverno

against: Aqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureTrivy

One alternative

Falco

against: Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender for Containersagainst: Aikido Security, Alert Logic, Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.

Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 14:00	no	0	5 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 14:11	yes	3	7 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 19:03	no	0	19 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 14:24	yes	10	3 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 17:01	yes	11	20 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 09:17	yes	5	4 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 10:57	yes	22	25 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 17:45	yes	5	4 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 09:47	no	0	30 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 09:04	yes	10	22 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 10:58	yes	15	64 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 12:27	yes	10	23 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 16:38	yes	3	16 s
Direct recommendation	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 14:01	yes	13	18 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 10:57	no	0	4 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 15:09	yes	2	4 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 11:38	no	0	15 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 15:45	yes	10	3 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 16:58	yes	8	9 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 19:27	yes	5	3 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 10:44	yes	23	20 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 16:52	yes	5	2 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 08:49	no	0	31 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 10:24	yes	14	53 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 10:03	yes	20	19 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 12:13	yes	19	31 s
Paraphrase	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 15:25	yes	4	10 s
Paraphrase	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 10:36	yes	10	16 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 16:03	yes	15	11 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 11:08	yes	4	11 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 19:35	no	0	17 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 17:54	yes	10	6 s
Comparative	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 14:39	yes	8	17 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 17:24	yes	5	6 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 19:40	yes	25	59 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 12:58	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 18:11	yes	5	25 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 12:12	yes	14	70 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 09:00	yes	24	65 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 10:47	yes	25	49 s
Comparative	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 13:43	yes	5	24 s
Comparative	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 09:04	yes	20	37 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 11:22	yes	17	10 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 11:33	yes	3	5 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 14:19	no	0	17 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 10:39	yes	10	3 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 18:51	yes	5	9 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 17:09	yes	5	6 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 14:58	yes	24	32 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 18:12	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 09:23	no	0	27 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 11:04	yes	20	27 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 13:13	yes	14	60 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 11:11	yes	15	39 s
Budget constrained	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 14:19	yes	4	14 s
Budget constrained	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 09:49	yes	13	22 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 15:38	yes	18	11 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 17:19	no	0	8 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 16:21	no	0	18 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 08:48	yes	10	6 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 15:30	yes	5	13 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 15:28	no	0	10 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 12:23	yes	19	31 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 12:28	yes	5	2 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 11:34	yes	5	39 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 11:46	yes	18	28 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 18:21	yes	14	76 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 10:53	yes	5	60 s
Scale constrained	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 13:18	yes	2	14 s
Scale constrained	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 09:23	yes	15	30 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 16:35	yes	18	9 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 19:43	no	0	4 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 16:14	no	0	17 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 09:27	yes	10	4 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 17:06	yes	16	15 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 08:59	yes	5	5 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 17:21	yes	24	49 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 13:54	yes	5	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 09:01	yes	5	27 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 12:32	yes	18	47 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 14:21	yes	19	85 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 16:45	yes	5	23 s
Negative framing	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 12:17	yes	4	14 s
Negative framing	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 12:24	yes	24	39 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide

Category-scoped readings

AWS ECR scanning read as Amazon ECR scanning

Aikido read as Aikido Security

Amazon ECR Scanning read as Amazon ECR scanning

Aqua read as Aqua Security

Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security

Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management

Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud read as Microsoft Defender for Containers

Microsoft Defender for Cloud (Azure) read as Microsoft Defender for Containers

Palo Alto read as Prisma Cloud

Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud

Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM

Rapid7 Container Security in InsightVM read as Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHCAS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Snyk read as Snyk Container

Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure

Tenable.io Container Security read as Tenable Container Security

Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security

Unresolved, counted raw

ARMO

ARMO (armosec.io)

AWS Container Insights

AWS GuardDuty for EKS

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Azure Defender for Containers

Broadcom Symphony

Datadog Container Security

Docker Security / Docker Scout

GCP Artifact Registry scanning

GitLab Container Scanning

GitLab's built-in container scanning

Google Artifact Registry Vulnerability Scanning

Kubewarden

Minimus images/registry

Open Policy Agent (OPA) Gatekeeper

Pod Security Admission

Portainer Community Edition

Trend Micro Container Security

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Container and Kubernetes security for small business buyers

By buyer segment

The standing

Recommended versus criticized

What they warned about

What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

Search against answers

How they answered

The record

Normalization in this category

Also in cloud and infrastructure