Index › IT › Cloud and infrastructure › Managed Kubernetes › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Managed Kubernetes platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “managed Kubernetes platform”, and as “hosted Kubernetes service”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
62DigitalOcean Kubernetes31Google Kubernetes Engine04Civo Kubernetes04others

62% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 55% → 62%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.DigitalOcean Kubernetes held the lead, +7 points on 55%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01DigitalOcean Kubernetes62%3%69endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 55% → 62%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.55% → 62%
02Google Kubernetes Engine Lab in the set31%23%86endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 31%
03Civo Kubernetes4%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Show the eleven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Red Hat OpenShift0%67%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Amazon EKS0%50%74criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12Rancher0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
05Azure Kubernetes Service0%23%64accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Fly.io0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Railway0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Render0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
04Linode Kubernetes Engine0%6%36accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
06Northflank0%0%16accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
08Google Cloud Run Lab in the set0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Qovery0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Kubernetes Engine is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice three times of 4; the other thirteen models thirteen times of 52. Google Cloud Run is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01DigitalOcean Kubernetes62%
02Google Kubernetes Engine31%
03Civo Kubernetes4%
04Linode Kubernetes Engine0%
05Azure Kubernetes Service0%
06Northflank0%
07Qovery0%
08Google Cloud Run0%
09Render0%
10Railway0%
11Fly.io0%
12Rancher0%
13Amazon EKS0%
14Red Hat OpenShift0%

What they warned about

Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amazon EKS
50%
37 of 74 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“the main managed Kubernetes platforms to approach with caution—or avoid unless you have a very specific reason—... EKS, in particular, is frequently cited as becoming "prohibitively expensive"” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Google Kubernetes Engine
23%
20 of 86 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms that are consistently flagged as poor / high-risk fits for SMBs ... EKS, GKE Standard, and AKS manage the control plane only” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Azure Kubernetes Service
23%
15 of 64 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“AKS is a criticized challenger ... its free tier carries no financially backed guarantee at all” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Red Hat OpenShift
67%
12 of 18 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Red Hat OpenShift is particularly problematic for small teams. OpenShift is expensive with subscriptions that can exceed underlying compute costs” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 771 links across 168 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 54 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Qovery38 answers · 77 citations · 10 models
vendor site · DigitalOcean35 answers · 72 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Control Plane32 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Northflank19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rackspace19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mirantis17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GitHub15 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Google13 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
vendor site · DigitalOcean12 answers · 17 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best managed kubernetes platform”, “managed kubernetes platform”, “managed kubernetes platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
DigitalOcean parent site
DigitalOcean Kubernetes 62%
62%9374,000942
Google Kubernetes Engine cloud.google.com31%1912,400157,405,3474
Civo Kubernetes civo.com4%252014,772
AKS Automatic2%
OVHcloud Managed K8s2%
Linode linode.com
Linode Kubernetes Engine 0%
0%4530115,263 company76
Azure azure.microsoft.com
Azure Kubernetes Service 0%
0%165301,00047,9041,848,766$6,123
Northflank northflank.com0%531,300848,4931
Qovery qovery.com0%2839042,4590
Google Cloud google.dev
Google Cloud Run 0%
0%22165,0007,596881,346109

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloud.google.com, digitalocean.com, mirantis.com, spot.rackspace.com). The first result for “best managed kubernetes platform” is cycle.io.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best managed Kubernetes platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which hosted Kubernetes service would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top managed Kubernetes platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best managed Kubernetes platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a managed Kubernetes platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which managed Kubernetes platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
One alternativeAzure Kubernetes Service
DigitalOcean KubernetesChanged
One alternativeAmazon EKS
Google Kubernetes Engine
Four alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Civo Kubernetes, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Linode Kubernetes Engine
no first choiceagainst: Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, Nutanix Kubernetes Platform, Red Hat OpenShift
GPT-5.4 miniDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Four alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat OpenShift
Google Kubernetes EngineChanged
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
Google Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
One alternativeGoogle Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
no first choiceagainst: AWS Lightsail Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle Kubernetes Engine
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Google Kubernetes EngineHeld
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Google Kubernetes Engine
Three alternativesCivo Kubernetes, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesAkamai Linode Kubernetes Engine, Civo Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Hetzner
Google Kubernetes Engine
Six alternativesAWS ECS, AWS EKS Auto Mode, Civo Kubernetes, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, GCP Cloud Run, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Civo Kubernetes, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine Enterprise, Linode Kubernetes Engine, RKE2, Red Hat OpenShift, VMware Tanzu, k3s, kubeadm
Perplexity SonarDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Four alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Northflank
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
Five alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes, Scaleway Kapsule
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Four alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Northflank
against: Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud Run, Google Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, standard GKE
no first choiceagainst: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine, Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes, Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated/Managed OpenShift, VMware Tanzu
Grok 4.20Google Kubernetes Engine
Seven alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine, Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, Qovery, Rackspace Spot
against: Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift, VMware Tanzu
DigitalOcean KubernetesChanged
Two alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
Google Kubernetes Engine
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) with Auto Mode, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) with Automatic Mode, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Four alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Heroku, Render
against: Amazon EKS, Portainer, Rancher
Google Kubernetes Engine
Four alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Red Hat OpenShift, VMware Tanzu, k3s
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
Mistral SmallDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Two alternativesGoogle Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
Two alternativesExoscale’s Scalable Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Four alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Google Cloud Run, Porter, Qovery
against: Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) Auto Mode, Fly.io, Heroku, Railway, Render
Civo Kubernetes
Three alternativesDigitalOcean Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine, Scaleway Kapsule
no first choice
Six alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes, Rancher
against: IBM IKS, VMware Tanzu
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Portainer, Red Hat OpenShift, VMware Tanzu
DeepSeek V4 FlashDigitalOcean Kubernetes
One alternativeGoogle Kubernetes Engine
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
One alternativeGoogle Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Five alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Civo Kubernetes, Northflank, Porter, Qovery
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Civo Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
no first choice
Eight alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Container Apps, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Humanitec, Northflank, Porter, Qovery
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat OpenShift
Llama 4 MaverickDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine
no first choiceCivo Kubernetes
Two alternativesLinode Kubernetes Engine, Scaleway Kapsule
no first choiceagainst: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine Enterprise, Rafay Systems
Qwen 3.7 FlashGoogle Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean KubernetesChanged
One alternativeNorthflank
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesLinode Kubernetes Engine, Vultr Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Civo Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
no first choice
Six alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, EKS Fargate, Google Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, Portainer, Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift
Kimi K2DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Two alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
Two alternativesAzure AKS Free tier, Google Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS
Google Kubernetes Engine
One alternativeAzure Kubernetes Service
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Two alternativesCivo Kubernetes, Linode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Azure, Google Kubernetes Engine
AKS Automatic, Google Kubernetes Engine
Eleven alternativesAzure Container Apps, ECS/Fargate, EKS Auto Mode, Fly.io, Google Cloud Run, Nomad, Railway, Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift, Render, VMware Tanzu
against: Amazon EKS, Azure AKS with OpenShift, Google Kubernetes Engine, Rancher, Red Hat OpenShift
GLM 4.7 FlashXDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Five alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, VMware Tanzu
Google Kubernetes EngineChanged
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Five alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Northflank BYOC, Porter, Qovery
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Five alternativesAkamai Linode Kubernetes Engine, Azure Kubernetes Service, Civo Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine, Ionos CLOUD Managed Kubernetes
against: Amazon EKS
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
against: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat OpenShift, VMware Tanzu Kubernetes Service
MiniMax M2.5DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Five alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Linode Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat OpenShift
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
One alternativeLinode Kubernetes Engine
against: Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Three alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Google Kubernetes Engine, OVHcloud Managed K8s
Four alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Railway, Render, k3s
no first choiceagainst: Amazon EKS, IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service, Oracle Container Engine for Kubernetes
GPT-6 LunaGoogle Kubernetes Engine
Three alternativesAKS Automatic, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, EKS Auto Mode
Google Kubernetes EngineHeld
Two alternativesAKS Automatic, EKS Auto Mode
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Google Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
no first choiceagainst: Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine
Muse Glimmer 30BDigitalOcean Kubernetes
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
DigitalOcean KubernetesHeld
Two alternativesExoscale Scalable Kubernetes Service SKS, OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
against: Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
EKS Auto Mode, Google Kubernetes Engine
Six alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, DigitalOcean Kubernetes, Northflank BYOC, Porter, Qovery
against: Google Kubernetes Engine
DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Three alternativesAzure Kubernetes Service, Linode Kubernetes Engine, Scaleway Kapsule
against: Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Two alternativesAmazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service
against: Alibaba Cloud ACK, Amazon EKS, Azure Kubernetes Service, Google Kubernetes Engine, Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, Red Hat OpenShift
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:06yes1810 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:37yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:41no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:34yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:15yes512 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:53yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:51yes2034 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:42yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:48no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:58yes950 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:49yes1463 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:39no0101 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:38yes411 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:23yes1515 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:03no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:40no03 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:09no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:23yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:58yes57 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:06yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:35yes2030 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:35yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:15yes535 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:21yes2054 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:37yes2530 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:42yes542 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:16yes39 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:48yes1217 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:59yes1911 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:08yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:33no020 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:12yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:32yes918 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:19yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:50yes2439 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:42yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:52no033 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:40yes1039 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:30yes1248 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:00yes1576 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:17yes615 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:56yes1435 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:55no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:45yes55 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:51yes1525 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:35yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:23yes511 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:55yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:02yes2525 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:18yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:28yes531 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:34yes1025 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:06yes1422 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:20yes1537 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:41yes313 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:51yes1417 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:39no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:05yes510 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:48yes619 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:36yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:34yes918 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:26no011 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:03yes2361 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:10yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:32yes537 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:19yes2031 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:00yes1441 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:14no018 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:16yes619 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:11yes1436 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:28yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:13yes65 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:20no017 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:04yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:43yes1010 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:48yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:26yes2532 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:11yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:48yes2355 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:15yes2458 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:02yes23280 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:44no014 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:50yes316 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:41yes1527 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amazon EKS Auto Mode read as Amazon EKS
Civo read as Civo Kubernetes
DigitalOcean read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean (DOKS) read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean Kubernetes - DOKS read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean Kubernetes – DOKS read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes
DigitalOcean Kubernetes, DOKS read as DigitalOcean Kubernetes
Linode read as Linode Kubernetes Engine
Linode (Akamai/Kodbox) read as Linode Kubernetes Engine
Linode (LKE) read as Linode Kubernetes Engine
Linode (by Akamai) read as Linode Kubernetes Engine
Mirantis read as Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
OVHcloud read as OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
OVHcloud Kubernetes read as OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
OVHcloud MKS read as OVHcloud Managed Kubernetes
Platform9 read as Platform9 Managed Kubernetes
Scaleway read as Scaleway Kapsule
UpCloud read as UpCloud Managed Kubernetes
Vultr read as Vultr Kubernetes Engine
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS ECS Fargate
AWS EKS Auto Mode
AWS Lightsail Kubernetes
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) Auto Mode
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) with Auto Mode
Azure AKS Free tier
Azure AKS with OpenShift (ARO)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) with Automatic Mode
Exoscale SKS
Exoscale Scalable Kubernetes Service SKS
Exoscale’s Scalable Kubernetes Service
Fargate
Fargate/ECS
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) App Engine
IBM IKS
Ionos CLOUD Managed Kubernetes
Linode Kubernetes
OVHcloud Managed K8s
Plural.sh
Red Hat OpenShift Dedicated/Managed OpenShift
VMware Tanzu Kubernetes Service (Tanzu)
kubeadm
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← IaCObject storage →