Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is a Kubernetes-native container security product · redhat.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Trivy is first at 38%.
Trivy is first at 24%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Prisma Cloud is first at 31%.
“Choose Microsoft Defender for Containers / Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes for platform gravity”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
“For Kubernetes-Native Infrastructure (OpenShift): Choose Red Hat ACS”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“StackRox / Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security, Falco, Trivy/Grype”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · alternative
“If you run OpenShift, this is often the default choice.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“You should avoid looking for standalone StackRox licenses; instead, evaluate it within the Red Hat/OpenShift ecosystem.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Avoid these for limited budgets: ... Red Hat ACS are excellent but typically start at $1,500+/month”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Standalone deployment models outside OpenShift/Kubernetes ecosystems are legacy.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“no polished UI or 24/7 support like Datadog or Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, over the 39 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | 6 | View → | |
| 33 | 5 | View → | |
| 32 | 6 | View → | |
| 28 | 1 | View → | |
| 26 | 4 | View → | |
| 25 | 6 | View → | |
| 19 | 4 | View → | |
| 11 | 3 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 35 of the 39 answers that named Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and are not a share of its labels.
118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |