Colocation providers for enterprise buyers
Asked as “colocation provider”, and as “data center colocation space”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
66%
Clear leader
66Equinix23Digital Realty02CoreSite09others
66% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 59% → 66%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Equinix held the lead, +7 points on 59%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
TierPoint13%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: TierPoint (13%) replaces InterServer (24% then, 13% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Flexential18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Flexential (18%) replaces TierPoint (22% then, 12% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Equinix66%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 59% → 66%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
TierPoint13%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: TierPoint (13%) replaces InterServer (24% then, 13% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFlexential18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Flexential (18%) replaces TierPoint (22% then, 12% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseEquinix66%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 59% → 66%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Equinix66%11%62endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 59% → 66%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.59% → 66%
Equinix66%11%62endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 59% → 66%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.59% → 66%02
Digital Realty23%2%55accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 24% → 23%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 23%
Digital Realty23%2%55accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 24% → 23%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 23%03
CoreSite2%3%39accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%
CoreSite2%3%39accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%04
CyrusOne2%12%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
CyrusOne2%12%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%05QTS2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
06TierPoint2%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
TierPoint2%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
DataBank0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
DataBank0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11Switch0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08
Iron Mountain Data Centers0%4%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Iron Mountain Data Centers0%4%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07Flexential0%0%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Flexential0%0%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
NTT Global Data Centers0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
NTT Global Data Centers0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10QTS Data Centers0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Flexential vs DataBankFlexential vs InterServerFlexential vs Digital RealtyFlexential vs ColoCrossingEquinix vs TierPointEquinix vs CoreSiteEquinix vs DataBankEquinix vs InterServerEquinix vs Digital RealtyEquinix vs ColoCrossingTierPoint vs CoreSiteTierPoint vs DataBankTierPoint vs InterServerTierPoint vs Digital RealtyTierPoint vs ColoCrossingCoreSite vs DataBankCoreSite vs InterServerCoreSite vs Digital RealtyCoreSite vs ColoCrossingDataBank vs InterServerDataBank vs Digital RealtyDataBank vs ColoCrossingInterServer vs Digital RealtyInterServer vs ColoCrossingDigital Realty vs ColoCrossing
One product takes 66% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Equinix11%
7 of 62 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Major providers like Equinix, Digital Realty, CyrusOne, and others have established track records, but even they have had outages and issues” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
ColoCrossing100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Many users advise staying away from this provider due to unreliable service and inadequate support during outages.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
CyrusOne12%
4 of 32 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“CyrusOne was linked to a ransomware incident affecting managed service clients, even while the company said its colocation services were not directly involved” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Cyxtera Technologies
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Cyxtera Technologies is another provider that has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2023” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 821 links across 255 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 35 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · QuoteColo34 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
publisher (Gane)24 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Netrouting20 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CoreSite20 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · DataBank11 answers · 17 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Equinix10 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best colocation provider”, “colocation provider”, “colocation providers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equinix equinix.com | 66% | 136 | 33,100 | 2,002 | 83,527 | 77 | 1 | |
| Digital Realty digitalrealty.com | 23% | 104 | 14,800 | 726 | 68,677 | 30 | ||
| CoreSite coresite.com | 2% | 98 | 4,400 | 282 | 73,076 | $98 | 34 | |
| CyrusOne cyrusone.com | 2% | 48 | 8,100 | 350 | 10,755 | |||
| QTS | 2% | 18,100 | 48,168 | |||||
| TierPoint tierpoint.com | 2% | 66 | 3,600 | 192 | 33,285 | $160 | 63 | 5 |
| Qu Data Centres | 2% | |||||||
| Flexential flexential.com | 0% | 68 | 4,400 | 306 | 79,719 | $915 | 120 | |
| Iron Mountain Data Centers ironmountain.com | 0% | 42 | 1,900 | 70 | 139,332 | $758 | 120 | |
| NTT Global Data Centers nttdata.com | 0% | 33 | 1,600 | 48 | 44,731 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (databank.com, equinix.com, netrouting.com, quotecolo.com). The first result for “best colocation provider” is equinix.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best colocation provider for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data center colocation space would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade colocation providers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best colocation provider for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a colocation provider. What should we look at?”Negative“Which colocation providers should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceQu Data Centresno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Equinix, Flexential, SwitchGPT-5.4 miniEquinixEquinixHeldEquinixTierPointagainst: Equinixno first choiceagainst: 365 Data Centers, CyrusOne, Cyxtera
Four alternatives
Digital Realty, Flexential, TierPoint, US SignalFive alternatives
Digital Realty, Flexential, TRG, TierPoint, US SignalFive alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data CentersOne alternative
CoreSiteGemini 3.5 FlashDigital Realty, EquinixEquinixChangedEquinixDigital Realtyagainst: Equinixno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
CoreSite, DataBank, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data CentersFive alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data CentersSix alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data CentersThree alternatives
Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data CentersPerplexity SonarEquinixEquinixHeldEquinixagainst: Aligned, STACK Infrastructure, Switch, VantageDigital Realtyno first choiceagainst: China Mobile or China Telecom Americas, ColoCrossing, DataBank, Equinix, TierPoint
Two alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtyTwo alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtyNine alternatives
Colt Data Centre Services, CoreSite, CyrusOne, DataBank, Digital Realty, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTSOne alternative
EquinixGrok 4.20EquinixDigital Realty, EquinixChangedagainst: Centersquare, CyrusOne, TierPointEquinixEquinixno first choiceagainst: Cyxtera, IREN, TierPoint, under 365 Data Centers
Five alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, DataBank, Digital Realty, FlexentialSeven alternatives
CoreSite, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT, QTS, Switch, Verne GlobalTen alternatives
Aligned Data Centers, Cologix, CoreSite, CyrusOne, DataBank, Digital Realty, Flexential, QTS Realty Trust, STACK Infrastructure, Vantage Data CentersTwo alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtyMistral SmallCoreSite, EquinixDigital Realty, EquinixChangedEquinixEquinixno first choiceagainst: Cloudnium LLC., ColoCrossing, DataPacket, Otava Colocation Services, PhoenixNAP
Two alternatives
CyrusOne, FlexentialOne alternative
Digital RealtyOne alternative
Digital RealtyDeepSeek V4 FlashEquinixEquinixHeldEquinixDigital Realtyno first choiceagainst: CoreWeave
Six alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, TierPointTwo alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtySix alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data CentersTwo alternatives
Equinix, SwitchLlama 4 MaverickEquinixno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: ColoCrossing, Cyxtera Technologies, Equinix
Three alternatives
CoreSite, Digital Realty, Qu Data CentresQwen 3.7 FlashEquinixEquinixHeldEquinixEquinixno first choiceagainst: CoreSite, Equinix, GlobalSwitch
Three alternatives
Colt Technology Services, Digital Realty, Vantage Data CentersTwo alternatives
Digital Realty, NTT Global Data CentersFive alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data CentersThree alternatives
CoreSite, Cyxtera, Digital RealtyKimi K2EquinixEquinixHeldDigital Realty, EquinixCyrusOne, Digital Realtyno first choiceagainst: Cyxtera Technologies, TierPoint
Four alternatives
CoreSite, Digital Realty, Flexential, TierPointTwo alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtySeven alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data Centers, Switch, Inc.Two alternatives
Data Canopy, EquinixGLM 4.7 FlashXDigital Realty, EquinixEquinixChangedEquinixDigital Realtyno first choiceagainst: ColoCrossing, Colocation America, Core Scientific, CyrusOne, DediOutlet Network Services, Digerati, Equinix, IPAX, QTS
Three alternatives
CoreSite, QTS Data Centers, TierPointThree alternatives
CoreSite, Digital Realty, QTS Data CentersSeven alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Flexential, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data CentersTwo alternatives
Equinix, TierPointMiniMax M2.5Equinixno first choiceChangedEquinixEquinixno first choiceagainst: AzeroCloud, CloudNordic, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Equinix
Seven alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data Centers, SwitchSix alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data Centers, QTS Data CentersTwo alternatives
Digital Realty, SwitchGPT-6 LunaEquinixEquinixHeldDigital Realty, Equinixagainst: Iron Mountain Data CentersQTSno first choiceagainst: Cyxtera
Two alternatives
CoreSite, Digital RealtyOne alternative
Digital RealtyFour alternatives
CoreSite, CyrusOne, NTT Global Data Centers, QTSTwo alternatives
Digital Realty, EquinixMuse Glimmer 30BEquinixEquinixHeldEquinixDigital Realty, Equinixno first choiceagainst: ColoCrossing, Cyxtera Technologies, HorizonIQ / Internap Corporation
Three alternatives
CoreSite, Digital Realty, NTT Global Data CentersOne alternative
Digital RealtyFour alternatives
CoreSite, Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, NTT Global Data CentersSeven alternatives
Aligned, CoreSite, CyrusOne, DataBank, Flexential, STACK, VantageBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 8 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 21 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 10 | 76 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:52 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:04 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 5 | 102 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:59 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 17 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:59 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:38 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:34 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:42 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:34 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:11 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:55 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 23 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 25 | 169 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 2 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Iron Mountain read as Iron Mountain Data Centers
Unresolved, counted raw
Aligned Data Centers
AzeroCloud
China Mobile or China Telecom Americas
CloudNordic
Cloudnium LLC.
Colt Data Centre Services
Compass Datacenters
Core Scientific
Data Canopy
DataPacket
DayOne Data Centers
DediOutlet Network Services
Digerati (Waiv Cloud)
GDS
GlobalSwitch
HorizonIQ / Internap Corporation
IPAX (Austria)
IREN
Layer3 Technology
Otava Colocation Services
Redwood Data Centers
Switch, Inc.
TRG
Verne Global
Vexos
under 365 Data Centers
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.