Colocation providers · November 2026 Edition
CoreSite vs ColoCrossing
Three of fourteen models named CoreSite first on the direct prompt; zero named ColoCrossing. CoreSite was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ColoCrossing by twelve and CoreSite carries 43 labels and ColoCrossing 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%67%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4312A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CoreSite reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Flexential was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Flexential vs CoreSite · Flexential vs ColoCrossing · Equinix vs CoreSite
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the colocation providers page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CoreSiteFirst choices, of fourteen modelsColoCrossing
Direct301 against CoreSite
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained023 against CoreSite
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against CoreSite · 8 against ColoCrossing
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CoreSite and ColoCrossing stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
CoreSite ColoCrossing first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CoreSite on the left and ColoCrossing on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CoreSite and ColoCrossing stood in it.
CoreSite first, ColoCrossing not the choice
3 of 14 modelsColoCrossing was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallCoreSite, Equinix alternatives: Flexential, ServerMania
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoreSite alternatives: Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, Liquid Power, Vantage Data Centers
MiniMax M2.5CoreSite alternatives: DataBank, Flexential, TierPoint
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniEquinix, TierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Flexential
Gemini 3.5 FlashFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, TierPoint
Perplexity SonarFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, Digital Realty, Equinix
Llama 4 MaverickTierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, CoreSite, Equinix, ServerMania
GLM 4.7 FlashXTierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Digital Realty, Equinix, Flexential
GPT-6 LunaDataBank alternatives: CoreSite, Equinix, Flexential
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Grok 4.20Flexential alternatives: DataBank, TierPoint
DeepSeek V4 FlashFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
Kimi K2Flexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
Muse Glimmer 30BFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: Digital Realty, Equinix, ServerMania
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CoreSite leads by two points.
CoreSite2%#8 of 12ColoCrossing0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
CoreSite leads by five points.
CoreSite9%#4 of 12ColoCrossing4%#8 of 12Enterprise
What the models said about CoreSite
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Market giants (like Equinix, Digital Realty, or CoreSite) offer top-tier infrastructure, but their business models cater primarily to enterprises” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Other options to consider include 365 Data Centers and CoreSite, but these tend to be more expensive” Mistral Small · budget prompt · soft negative
“Great if you need hybrid cloud adjacency, but can be pricier for basic colocation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“CoreSite is highlighted as the "best overall for interconnection depth" with native cloud onramps and a dense carrier ecosystem.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“choose CoreSite if cloud/network adjacency is central; otherwise choose Flexential” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one, I'd recommend CoreSite for most mid-sized B2B companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about ColoCrossing
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid providers that have a documented history of outages, poor support, or financial distress (e.g., ColoCrossing, INCERO, HorizonIQ, Cyxtera” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you want production reliability: ColoCrossing (especially Dallas), Cloudnium, and INCERO.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reviews on Trustpilot warn against using ColoCrossing due to issues with their services” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“providers with published 1U rates such as ColoCrossing $59/mo, GigeNET Chicago $99/mo or Sharktech $65-$99/mo are the lowest entry points” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Get a quote from Sharktech or ColoCrossing” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“ColoCrossing, offering colocation at $59 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Flexential vs CoreSiteFlexential vs ColoCrossingEquinix vs CoreSiteEquinix vs ColoCrossingTierPoint vs CoreSiteTierPoint vs ColoCrossingCoreSite vs DataBankCoreSite vs InterServerCoreSite vs Digital RealtyDataBank vs ColoCrossingInterServer vs ColoCrossingDigital Realty vs ColoCrossingAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full colocation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.