Colocation providers · November 2026 Edition
InterServer vs ColoCrossing
Zero of fourteen models named InterServer first on the direct prompt; zero named ColoCrossing. InterServer was named by nine of the fourteen models and ColoCrossing by twelve and both carry 12 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%67%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1212Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, InterServer reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Flexential was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Flexential vs InterServer · Flexential vs ColoCrossing · Equinix vs InterServer
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the colocation providers page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
InterServerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsColoCrossing
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained42
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against InterServer · 8 against ColoCrossing
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where InterServer and ColoCrossing stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
InterServer ColoCrossing first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, InterServer on the left and ColoCrossing on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where InterServer and ColoCrossing stood in it.
Neither was named
14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniEquinix, TierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Flexential
Gemini 3.5 FlashFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, TierPoint
Perplexity SonarFlexential alternatives: CoreSite, DataBank, Digital Realty, Equinix
Grok 4.20Flexential alternatives: DataBank, TierPoint
Mistral SmallCoreSite, Equinix alternatives: Flexential, ServerMania
DeepSeek V4 FlashFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
Llama 4 MaverickTierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, CoreSite, Equinix, ServerMania
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoreSite alternatives: Digital Realty, Iron Mountain Data Centers, Liquid Power, Vantage Data Centers
Kimi K2Flexential, TierPoint alternatives: 365 Data Centers, DataBank
GLM 4.7 FlashXTierPoint alternatives: CoreSite, Digital Realty, Equinix, Flexential
MiniMax M2.5CoreSite alternatives: DataBank, Flexential, TierPoint
GPT-6 LunaDataBank alternatives: CoreSite, Equinix, Flexential
Muse Glimmer 30BFlexential, TierPoint alternatives: Digital Realty, Equinix, ServerMania
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
InterServer leads by thirteen points.
InterServer13%#2 of 12ColoCrossing0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
InterServer leads by four points.
InterServer7%#6 of 12ColoCrossing4%#8 of 12Enterprise
InterServer is not named for this buyer.
InterServer—not namedColoCrossing0%#– of 12What the models said about InterServer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Offers secure colocation with multi-layer protection, but has limited data centers.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a company with a limited budget, InterServer is the strongest starting point” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“InterServer and Hetzner Online stand out as top budget-friendly options” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with InterServer if you're flexible on location” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about ColoCrossing
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid providers that have a documented history of outages, poor support, or financial distress (e.g., ColoCrossing, INCERO, HorizonIQ, Cyxtera” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you want production reliability: ColoCrossing (especially Dallas), Cloudnium, and INCERO.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reviews on Trustpilot warn against using ColoCrossing due to issues with their services” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“providers with published 1U rates such as ColoCrossing $59/mo, GigeNET Chicago $99/mo or Sharktech $65-$99/mo are the lowest entry points” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Get a quote from Sharktech or ColoCrossing” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“ColoCrossing, offering colocation at $59 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Flexential vs InterServerFlexential vs ColoCrossingEquinix vs InterServerEquinix vs ColoCrossingTierPoint vs InterServerTierPoint vs ColoCrossingCoreSite vs InterServerCoreSite vs ColoCrossingDataBank vs InterServerDataBank vs ColoCrossingInterServer vs Digital RealtyDigital Realty vs ColoCrossingAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full colocation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.