5 categories · RankedLogicGate
LogicGate is a governance, risk and compliance (GRC) platform for enterprises, positioned as an AI GRC platform and used for compliance automation and third-party risk management · logicgate.ai ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Vanta is first at 30%.
Hyperproof is first at 22%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management is first at 25%.
Why models recommend it
“the most balanced recommendation for a typical mid-sized B2B is a no-code modular platform such as LogicGate Risk Cloud”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“High ratings (4.6–4.7/5), praised for flexibility, no-code customization, automation, and support.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · first choice
“a unified GRC platform such as Compyl, Hyperproof, or LogicGate is the right starting point”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“For fast compliance in tech/SaaS: Start with Vanta or LogicGate.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Focuses on mid-market workflow flexibility with no-code process modeling. Lacks native CCM or governed AI.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · warning
“Their pricing models can sometimes lead to unexpected costs regarding user seats or data storage.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“though those skew more toward broader GRC/enterprise use than pure continuity planning”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · warning
“Enterprise-grade with broader GRC ... but less "automation-first" than the above.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as LogicGate, over the 124 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 27 | Compare → | |
| 66 | 0 | View → | |
| 65 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 58 | 3 | View → | |
| 57 | 4 | View → | |
| 52 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 1 | View → | |
| 44 | 4 | View → | |
| 41 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of LogicGate →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on LogicGate's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprise
- Price stated
- Custom enterprise pricing, request a demo for details.
- Starting price
- 0
- Integrations
- 200
- Certifications
- FedRAMP, SOC 2
- Customers named
- Luno
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 118 of the 124 answers that named LogicGate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
284 of the 284 domain citations in answers naming LogicGate came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 366 | 27 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 226 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 56 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 45 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 26 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 13 | 0 | 2022-09-12 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-06-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Cyber risk management agents wbr conference or event
- 2026-09-245 grc trends reshaping hospitality retail blog
- 2026-09-24Strong fundamentals make next gen security possible news or press
- 2026-09-22Why you cant vibe code a holistic grc program blog
- 2026-09-21How to manage ai risks a practical framework blog
- 2026-09-18Logicgate named a leader in the idc marketscape for third party risk management software blog
Events in person
- June 2, 2026 to June 3, 2026Agility UKBankside Hotel, London · took part
- May 12, 2026 to May 13, 2026Agility 2026 conferenceThe Westin Chicago River North, Chicago · took part
As the event pages on logicgate.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page logicgate.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.