4 categories · RankedHyperproof
Hyperproof is a governance, risk and compliance (GRC) platform for teams that handle compliance work such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001 audits · hyperproof.io ↗
Strongest at mid-market, contested with Vanta. Ranked 11 of 80 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Vanta is first at 30%.
Ranked first, contested: Vanta has 16%. 7 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management is first at 25%.
Why models recommend it
“Recognized for its rapid deployment, no-code configurability, and broad framework coverage ... making it a strong fit for mid-market B2B companies”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with LogicGate or Hyperproof as they offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and mid-market pricing.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“Hyperproof or Compyl — they hit the sweet spot of being robust enough for a maturing program without the enterprise bloat.”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Modern Mid-Market GRC *(Best overall fit)* | Hyperproof, AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk Cloud”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Quote-only pricing with high minimum commitments”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Hyperproof as a complete enterprise GRC replacement: ... may lack the depth of broader platforms for risk assessment”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Higher‑tier tools (Sprinto, Hyperproof) are still mid‑market price points and may be overkill for very small teams.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · warning
“could work but are better for teams with heavier risk registers... less ideal for a typical mid-sized B2B focus”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Hyperproof, over the 183 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | 36 | Compare → | |
| 150 | 66 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 8 | View → | |
| 81 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 62 | 2 | View → | |
| 61 | 2 | View → | |
| 56 | 1 | View → | |
| 52 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 51 | 2 | View → | |
| 45 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Hyperproof →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Hyperproof's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- your team, the people doing the work
- Integrations
- 200
- Certifications
- FedRAMP, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- OutSystems, Acuity International, Appian, Thales, Artemis Health, AGDATA, Hyperproof and HyperComply, AppLovin
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 173 of the 183 answers that named Hyperproof and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
451 of the 451 domain citations in answers naming Hyperproof came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 79 | 14 | 2026-09-14 | GRC | |
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-11-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-06-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2020-05-15 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2023-08-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14How to prioritize implementing new compliance frameworks gate blog
- 2026-09-04Operationalizing compliance for ma and ipo blog
- 2026-09-04Operationalizing compliance for ma and ipo gate blog
- 2026-08-19Global control eu compliance gate blog
- 2026-08-19Global control eu compliance blog
- 2026-08-125 key moves to build a grc program that measures up blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hyperproof.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.