8 categories · RankedSecureframe
Secureframe is a compliance automation platform that helps organizations meet security frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS and GDPR, and manage risk, including third-party risk · secureframe.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Vanta is first at 30%.
Hyperproof is first at 22%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management is first at 25%.
Why models recommend it
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company, I'd lean Secureframe for the typical mid-market buyer”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Vanta or Secureframe offer the fastest time-to-certification with guided support.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Drata or Secureframe”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“For most early-stage SaaS companies ... Sprinto or Secureframe offer the best balance of speed, simplicity, and cost.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“A Reddit thread titled “Avoid Secureframe” claims: “Very unprofessional organization.””Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Avoid platforms like Vanta, Drata, or Secureframe initially”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Smaller native integration library than Vanta/Drata. If your tech stack uses niche or legacy tools, expect manual evidence uploads.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Secureframe, Sprinto, or similar "fast implementation" products when you need complex governance: ... should be tested carefully”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Secureframe, over the 274 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 239 | 31 | Compare → | |
| 236 | 83 | Compare → | |
| 154 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 8 | View → | |
| 79 | 2 | View → | |
| 75 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 1 | View → | |
| 61 | 0 | View → | |
| 49 | 0 | View → | |
| 48 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Secureframe →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Secureframe's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- Small Business, Enterprise, Defense contractors
- Price stated
- Starting at $7,000/year
- Starting price
- 7000
- Integrations
- 300
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP, CMMC Level 2
- Hosting
- United States, London
- Customers named
- Coda, Stream, PerkUp, Kinectify, PrizePicks, OTH Security, Abmatic AI, Base Power
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 235 of the 274 answers that named Secureframe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
590 of the 590 domain citations in answers naming Secureframe came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 909 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 349 | 0 | 2025-05-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 116 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| News or press | 97 | 2 | 2026-08-16 | ||
| Comparison | 82 | 3 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 64 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Ai penetration testing blog
- 2026-09-23Risk management frameworks blog
- 2026-09-22Sbom requirements defense contractors blog
- 2026-09-17Data retention policy blog
- 2026-09-15Fedramp 20x moderate class c blog
- 2026-09-09Password policy blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page secureframe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.