OT and IoT security · RankedDragos Platform
Dragos Platform is an OT and IoT security product from Dragos, built for operational technology environments · dragos.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 49%.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 38%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Claroty xDome is first at 36%.
Why models recommend it
“The most OT-specialized choice on this list: asset visibility, OT threat detection, vulnerability prioritization, and incident-response context”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“Strictly Air-Gapped Industrial / Power Grid / Refining | Dragos or Claroty (CTD)”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Industry‑leading OT‑specific threat‑detection & intelligence (Dragos WorldView)”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Use dedicated OT-native platforms (Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Armis)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“or Dragos (strong in detection/response but services-heavy) unless you can start with their entry-level or managed service tiers”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid expensive enterprise platforms like Claroty Essential ($100K+) or Dragos unless you have significant budget”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid the premium OT-native suites – Claroty, Nozomi, Dragos, Armis – for a tight budget”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid Dragos for mid-market unless you're in critical infrastructure”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Dragos Platform, over the 127 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 125 | 25 | View → | |
| 111 | 14 | View → | |
| 91 | 27 | View → | |
| 84 | 3 | View → | |
| 59 | 6 | View → | |
| 59 | 0 | View → | |
| 53 | 3 | View → | |
| 44 | 1 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 13 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Dragos Platform →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Dragos Platform's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- critical infrastructure operations
- Free plan or trial
- free demo
- Customers named
- Littleton Electric Light & Water Department (LELWD), OUC, Koch Industries, Trinity River Authority of Texas, The Boston Beer Company
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 112 of the 127 answers that named Dragos Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
375 of the 375 domain citations in answers naming Dragos Platform came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 402 | 21 | 2026-10-01 | BAS, XDR | |
| News or press | 82 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | SIEM, Cyber risk quant | |
| Report or ebook | 9 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-08-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2024-09-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2024-10-21 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2019-11-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2025-08-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Mtsa device security blog
- 2026-09-30Xot software supply chain security blog
- 2026-09-28Dragos appliance datasheet report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Vl prosperity mtsa maritime cybersecurity blog
- 2026-09-23Xot visibility beyond asset inventory blog
- 2026-09-21Dragos acquires netrise and runzero news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page dragos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.