Microsoft Defender for IoT is an OT and IoT security product from Microsoft · microsoft.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Fortinet OT Security Platform at 9%.
Ranked first, contested: Claroty xDome has 20%. 5 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Claroty xDome is first at 36%.
“The top results suggest that Microsoft Defender for IoT is a recommended industrial and IoT device security tool for mid-sized B2B companies.”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Start with Microsoft Defender for IoT if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem—it's the most cost-effective entry point”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Defender for IoT OT site license XS at ~$70/mo per site up to 100 devices is the most accessible commercial starting point.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Microsoft Defender for IoT stands out as the most budget-friendly option, with per-site licensing starting at $70/month”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“often criticized for requiring integration with separate SIEM and SOAR tools, which can complicate deployment”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Microsoft Defender for IoT is generally well-regarded but can feel basic if not combined with others.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Microsoft Defender for IoT has been criticized for its premium pricing and complex deployments.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Treat carefully if you operate air-gapped or sovereign sites.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Defender for IoT, over the 151 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 123 | 35 | Compare → | |
| 101 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 91 | 10 | View → | |
| 90 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 66 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 55 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Microsoft Defender for IoT →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Microsoft Defender for IoT's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 143 of the 151 answers that named Microsoft Defender for IoT and are not a share of its labels.
391 of the 475 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Defender for IoT came from a third party's page. Thirty-nine were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |