November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Security operations › Compliance automation › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Compliance automation for small business buyers

Asked as “compliance automation platform”, and as “SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · Sprinto 23%
34Vanta23Sprinto13Scytale30others

34% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 35% → 34%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Vanta held the lead, −1 point on 35%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Vanta34%26%68criticized default▼−1Since October 2026: 35% → 34%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.35% → 34%
02Sprinto23%8%59accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 25% → 23%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 23%
03Scytale13%5%19accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 0% → 13%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.0% → 13%
04Drata6%16%67accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
05Secureframe6%11%55accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
06Scrut Automation2%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Hyperproof0%50%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Thoropass0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Vanta34%
02Sprinto23%
03Scytale13%
04Drata6%
05Secureframe6%
06Scrut Automation2%
07Thoropass0%
08Hyperproof0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Vanta
26%
18 of 68 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget | Vanta | Enterprise-focused, custom pricing typically $10K+” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Drata
16%
11 of 67 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid or be cautious about Sprinto, Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe if you are a small business” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Hyperproof
50%
8 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms with mostly manual processes (e.g., some enterprise-focused ones like Hyperproof, Onspring, or older tools): Avoid” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Secureframe
11%
6 of 55 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget | Secureframe | Pricing above Vanta/Drata for comparable scope” Kimi K2, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 848 links across 201 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

35 answers · 69 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sprinto21 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Vanta19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · UnderDefense16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Drata14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · ComplyJet13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Vanta vanta.com34%38140,5001,21972,2601201
Sprinto sprinto.com23%2562,4007926,89643
Scytale scytale.ai13%6112,1002257,411$23,65914
Drata drata.com6%3689,90025736,413547
Secureframe secureframe.com6%2352,4003945,01427
Secure Privacy secureprivacy.ai4%61,0005993,9199
Scrut Automation scrut.io2%1173901010,568349
ComplyJet complyjet.com2%269002,025
Risk Cognizance riskcognizance.com2%6
Secfix2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (drata.com, vanta.com). The first result for “best compliance automation platform” is vanta.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best compliance automation platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top compliance automation platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best compliance automation platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a compliance automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which compliance automation platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Sprinto
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Vanta
VantaChanged
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto
Vanta
Four alternativesDrata, Scytale, Secureframe, Sprinto
ComplyJet, Sprinto
Three alternativesComplinity, Eramba, Secureframe
no first choiceagainst: Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, TrustArc
GPT-5.4 miniVanta
Four alternativesDrata, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, Sprinto
VantaHeld
Two alternativesDrata, Secureframe
Drata, Vanta
Four alternativesHyperproof, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, Sprinto
against: OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
Scytale, Secfix
One alternativeSprinto
against: Drata, Secureframe, Vanta
no first choiceagainst: Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Onspring
Gemini 3.5 FlashVanta
Four alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
Drata, VantaChanged
Two alternativesSecureframe, Sprinto
Vanta
Five alternativesDrata, Oneleet, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
Sprinto
Five alternativesComp AI, Drata, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, Vanta
no first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, MetricStream, OneTrust Certification Automation, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Thoropass, Vanta, Workiva
Perplexity SonarSprinto
Four alternativesDrata, Scrut Automation, Thoropass, Vanta
VantaChanged
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto
Drata, Sprinto, Vanta
Two alternativesScrut Automation, Secureframe
against: Thoropass
Sprinto
Two alternativesComp AI, Probo
against: Vanta
no first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, LogicGate, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass, Vanta
Grok 4.20Scytale, Vanta
Two alternativesCentraleyes, Drata
against: Diligent, Mitratech Alyne
SprintoChanged
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Vanta
against: Hyperproof, Scytale
Sprinto, Vanta
Three alternativesDrata, Scrut Automation, Secureframe
against: AuditBoard, Onspring, PowerDMS
Scytale
Three alternativesDrata, LowerPlane, Sprinto
against: Vanta
Vanta
Three alternativesCentraleyes, Scytale, Sprinto
against: Drata, Hyperproof, Onspring, Vanta
Mistral SmallDrata, Secureframe, Vanta
Two alternativesScytale, Sprinto
vCISO LiteChanged
Four alternativesDrata, Scytale, Sprinto, Vanta
Scytale, Sprinto
Three alternativesCentraleyes, Drata, Hyperproof
Sprinto
Two alternativesComp AI, Risk Cognizance
no first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
DeepSeek V4 FlashScytale
Four alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
SecureframeChanged
One alternativeDrata
against: Vanta
Vanta
Six alternativesDrata, Hyperproof, Onspring, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, Sprinto
Secure Privacy
Two alternativesEqually.ai, PowerDMS
against: Drata, Sprinto, Vanta
no first choiceagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, MetricStream, Onspring, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Vanta
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldScytale, Vantaagainst: Diligent, Mitratech AlyneSprinto
Three alternativesIdentity Confluence, PowerDMS, Secure Privacy
no first choiceagainst: Sprinto, Vanta
Qwen 3.7 FlashVanta
Two alternativesDrata, Secureframe
Scrut AutomationChanged
Two alternativesDrata, Sprinto
against: Vanta
Scytale
Two alternativesDrata, Sprinto
against: Hyperproof
Vanta
Two alternativesDrata, Thoropass
no first choiceagainst: Dayforce, Drata, Optro, Resolver, Rippling, Secureframe, Vanta
Kimi K2Scytale
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto
DrataChanged
Three alternativesSecureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
LowerPlane, Sprinto
Three alternativesDrata, Hyperproof, Vanta
against: ComplyZen.ai
Sprinto
Three alternativesComp AI, OneTrust Certification Automation, Scrut Automation
against: Drata, Secureframe, Vanta
no first choiceagainst: ComplianceQuest, Drata, ShipCompliant, Vanta
GLM 4.7 FlashXVanta
Four alternativesDrata, Probo, Secureframe, Sprinto
against: Archer, AuditBoard
VantaHeld
Three alternativesDrata, Secureframe, Sprinto
Drata, Secureframe, Vanta
Six alternativesCentraleyes, Hyperproof, Process Street, Scytale, Sprinto, Thoropass
Secure Privacy
Four alternativesConnecteam, GoAudits, PowerDMS, UserWay Accessibility Widget
no first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, PowerDMS, Resolver, Vanta
MiniMax M2.5Scytale
Three alternativesDrata, Sprinto, Vanta
SprintoChanged
Five alternativesComplyJet, Drata, Openlane, Scytale, Secureframe
against: DIY, TrustCloud Free Tier
Scytale, Sprinto
Two alternativesDrata, Vanta
Risk Cognizance
One alternativeProbo
no first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Workday Compliance
GPT-6 LunaVanta
Two alternativesDrata, Secureframe
SecureframeChanged
Two alternativesDrata, Vanta
no first choiceTrustCloud
Two alternativesComplyJet, Secureframe
against: Vanta
no first choiceagainst: accessiBe
Muse Glimmer 30BVanta
Five alternativesComp AI, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass
VantaHeld
Four alternativesDrata, Scrut Automation, Secureframe, Sprinto
Sprinto, Vanta
Four alternativesComp AI, Drata, Scrut Automation, Secureframe
Sprinto
Four alternativesLowerPlane, Probo, Scrut Automation, iAuditor
no first choiceagainst: Scrut Automationagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:29yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:56yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:48yes1319 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:06yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:59yes58 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:28yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:25yes2428 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:26yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:34no032 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:19yes1530 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:24yes1576 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:27yes1026 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:45yes321 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:00yes1423 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:09yes1910 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:36yes310 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:16no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:08yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:33yes1513 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:17yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:01yes2142 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:38yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:55yes531 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:11yes1695 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:32yes1029 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:25yes2256 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:15yes413 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:18yes1426 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:59yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:04yes38 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:34yes918 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:42yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:39yes1016 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:47yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:32yes2346 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:01yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:29yes525 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:04yes1838 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:46yes923 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:38yes520 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:18yes622 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:42yes1330 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:45yes109 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:25yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:50yes814 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:29yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:55yes2013 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:20yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:47yes2343 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:34yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:12yes1017 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:51yes1527 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:25yes1983 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:48yes526 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:26yes426 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:49yes1318 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:35no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:52no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:16no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:13yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:39yes1415 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:04no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:27yes2167 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:09yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:29no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:27yes2435 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:51yes1935 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:56no018 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:56yes317 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:57yes1418 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:16yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:49yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:36yes1125 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:53yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:38yes2017 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:08yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:59yes2141 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:34yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:06yes1450 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:04yes2453 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 19:31yes22123 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:17no027 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:11yes215 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:25yes2233 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OneTrust read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
OneTrust (Enterprise GRC) read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
Scrut read as Scrut Automation
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Complinity
ComplyZen.ai
DIY (Google Sheets)
Dayforce (by ADP)
Equally.ai
GoAudits
Openlane
TrustArc
TrustCloud Free Tier
TrustVault
UserWay Accessibility Widget
Workday Compliance
accessiBe
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Comms archivingCyber risk quant →