Insider risk management for small business buyers
Asked as “insider risk management tool”, and as “insider threat platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
50%
Clear leader
50Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management16Teramind07ActivTrak27others
50% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 42% → 50%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management held the lead, +8 points on 42%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management50%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 42% → 50%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management45%Clear leader▲+19Since October 2026: 26% → 45%, +19 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management57%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 44% → 57%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management50%9%58endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 42% → 50%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.42% → 50%
02
Teramind16%22%55accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 11% → 16%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 16%
Teramind16%22%55accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 11% → 16%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 16%03
ActivTrak7%9%32accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
ActivTrak7%9%32accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%04
Coro5%14%22accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 18% → 5%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 5%
Coro5%14%22accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 18% → 5%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 5%05
Above Security5%36%14criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
Above Security5%36%14criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Exabeam0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Exabeam0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Forcepoint DLP0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Forcepoint DLP0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
DTEX InTERCEPT0%67%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
DTEX InTERCEPT0%67%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Proofpoint0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Proofpoint0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Safetica0%0%18accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Safetica0%0%18accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs TeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Code42 IncydrMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs ActivTrak
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs ApployeMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs CyberhavenMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs DTEX SystemsTeramind vs Code42 IncydrTeramind vs ActivTrakTeramind vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementTeramind vs ApployeTeramind vs CyberhavenTeramind vs DTEX SystemsCode42 Incydr vs ActivTrakCode42 Incydr vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementCode42 Incydr vs ApployeCode42 Incydr vs CyberhavenCode42 Incydr vs DTEX SystemsActivTrak vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementActivTrak vs ApployeActivTrak vs CyberhavenActivTrak vs DTEX SystemsProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs ApployeProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs CyberhavenProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs DTEX SystemsApploye vs CyberhavenApploye vs DTEX SystemsCyberhaven vs DTEX Systems
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
02030405
060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management50%
02Teramind16%
Teramind16%03ActivTrak7%
ActivTrak7%04Coro5%
Coro5%05Above Security5%
Above Security5%06Apploye2%
Apploye2%07Safetica0%
Safetica0%08Proofpoint0%
Proofpoint0%09DTEX InTERCEPT0%
DTEX InTERCEPT0%10Exabeam0%
Exabeam0%11Forcepoint DLP0%
Forcepoint DLP0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Teramind22%
12 of 55 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Examples to avoid: Tools like DTEX Systems, Teramind, or certain features in Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and Forcepoint Insider Threat.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
DTEX InTERCEPT67%
12 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid: Forcepoint, DTEX (Dtex Systems), Securonix, Veriato, Exabeam.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Exabeam90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid: Forcepoint, DTEX (Dtex Systems), Securonix, Veriato, Exabeam.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Forcepoint DLP77%
10 of 13 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid: Forcepoint, DTEX (Dtex Systems), Securonix, Veriato, Exabeam.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 758 links across 137 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 49 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
55 answers · 85 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Microsoft45 answers · 76 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)27 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge24 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Jazz21 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · CISA14 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · DTEX13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 10 models
33 answers · 10 models
30 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best insider risk management tool”, “insider risk management tool”, “insider risk management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management 50%, Microsoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premium 7%, Microsoft 365 2%, Microsoft Purview DLP 0% and 1 more | 59% | 215 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Teramind teramind.co | 16% | 137 | 5,400 | 119 | 19,425 | $518 | 48 | 2 |
| ActivTrak activtrak.com | 7% | 47 | 8,100 | 156 | 18,356 | $11,550 | 47 | |
| Coro coro.net | 5% | 90 | 49,500 | 4,833 | 3,791 | 3 | ||
| Above Security above.security | 5% | 46 | 390 | 178 | 172 | 7 | ||
| Code42 Incydr mimecast.com | 4% | 51 | 110 | 6 | 148,929 | 21 | ||
| Apploye apploye.com | 2% | 35 | 480 | 4 | 45,528 | 1 | ||
| BetterCloud bettercloud.com | 2% | 180 | 1,300 | 8 | 26,677 | |||
| Safetica safetica.com | 0% | 38 | 170 | 10 | 515 | 4 | ||
| Venn venn.com | 0% | 17 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (learn.microsoft.com, microsoft.com). The first result for “best insider risk management tool” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best insider risk management tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which insider threat platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top insider risk management tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best insider risk management tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an insider risk management tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which insider risk management tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementTeramindChangedMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementTeramindno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Coro, Safetica, TeramindThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Safetica, StaffcopThree alternatives
Code42 Incydr, Coro Insider Threat Solution, TeramindThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Coro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Incydr, Proofpoint, TeramindThree alternatives
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Teramind, Varonis Data Security PlatformThree alternatives
Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Varonis Data Security PlatformTwo alternatives
Incydr, Varonis Data Security PlatformGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementCode42 IncydrChangedMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementTeramindagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, Forcepoint DLPno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, InterGuard, Splunk Enterprise Security, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind, Trellix DLP, Veriato
Four alternatives
Code42 Incydr, Metomic, Nightfall AI, TeramindThree alternatives
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, TeramindFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Code42 Incydr, CurrentWare, DTEX InTERCEPT, TeramindFour alternatives
CurrentWare, Ekran System, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, WazuhPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Above Security, ActivTrakTeramindChangedagainst: ActivTrak, DTEX InTERCEPT, Forcepoint DLP, ProofpointMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, ManageEngine Log360ActivTrakno first choiceagainst: Exabeam, Gurucul, Securonix UEBA
One alternative
TeramindTwo alternatives
Coro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Coro, Incydr, Teramind, Varonis Data Security PlatformTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, TeramindOne alternative
Microsoft Purview DLPGrok 4.20Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Securonix UEBA, Varonis Data Security PlatformMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, TeramindApployeagainst: Cyberhaven, DTEX InTERCEPT, Forcepoint DLP, IBM Guardium, Varonis Data Security PlatformMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: OpenUBAMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: DTEX Systems, Exabeam, Forcepoint Insider Threat, Hubstaff, IBM Guardium, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, ObserveIT, Proofpoint, Refog, Securonix UEBA, Splunk UBA, Symantec, Teramind
Four alternatives
ActivTrak, Code42, DoControl, SafeticaTwo alternatives
Coro, SafeticaFour alternatives
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Nightfall AI, Safetica, TeramindFive alternatives
ActivTrak, ManageEngine Log360, Safetica, Teramind, WazuhOne alternative
DTEX InTERCEPTMistral SmallMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: TeramindCoro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Teramindno first choiceagainst: Code42 Incydr, DTEX InTERCEPT, Veriato
Two alternatives
Apploye, SafeticaThree alternatives
Apploye, DoControl, JazzTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, ApployeDeepSeek V4 FlashCoro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Above Security, TeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementChangedTeramindTeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Apploye, Proofpoint, Teramindagainst: Above Security, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Netskope DLP, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix UEBA, Splunk Enterprise Security, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
One alternative
SafeticaTwo alternatives
Coro, TeramindFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, VennThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Purview Suite add-on, SafeticaThree alternatives
Google-native DLP, Keepnet, TessianLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldno first choiceApployeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, TeramindFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, Coro, TeramindTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, TeramindQwen 3.7 FlashTeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementChangedMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementActivTrakMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementnothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, SafeticaTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, TeramindFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, Coro, TeramindTwo alternatives
Apploye, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Above Security, ActivTrak, TeramindKimi K2CoroTeramindChangedSafeticaMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business PremiumMicrosoft 365against: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Two alternatives
ManageEngine Endpoint DLP Plus, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementFive alternatives
Apploye, Code42, Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, TeramindThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, TeramindSix alternatives
Apploye, BeyondCorp, Coro, Google Workspace, Microsoft Purview for Business Premium, SafeticaGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Above Security, Apploye, DTEX InTERCEPT, Okta, TeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Identity ProtectionMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramindno first choiceagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, DataPatrol, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, Refog, Securonix UEBA, Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform, Veriato
One alternative
SafeticaTwo alternatives
Above Security, ApployeEight alternatives
Apploye, Coro, Cyberhaven, DTEX InTERCEPT, Lepide Data Security Platform, Teramind, Varonis Data Security, VennThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, DeskTrustMiniMax M2.5ActivTrak, Teramindagainst: Above SecurityMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business PremiumChangedApploye, Vennagainst: TeramindActivTrakBetterCloud, Code42 Incydr, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: Elastic Security, ManageEngine DataSecurity Plus, Splunk UBA, Wazuhnothing named
Two alternatives
Coro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Apploye, Safetica, VennThree alternatives
Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, SafeticaTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, TeramindGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Managementagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premiumagainst: Teramindno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Managementnothing named
One alternative
Teramind DLPTwo alternatives
Code42 Incydr, TeramindMuse Glimmer 30BAbove Security, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementAbove Security, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementHeldagainst: CoroMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premiumagainst: Coro, DTEX InTERCEPT, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint, VeriatoMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premiumagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint, VeriatoAbove Securityagainst: Coro, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramindagainst: DTEX InTERCEPT, Exabeam, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint, Securonix UEBA, Veriato
Four alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, Coro, TeramindOne alternative
TeramindFour alternatives
Above Security, ActivTrak, Apploye, TeramindThree alternatives
Apploye, EmpMonitor, TeramindBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:25 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 5 | 68 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:42 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:44 | yes | 8 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 19 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 13 | 67 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:56 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:41 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:42 | no | 0 | 76 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:02 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 23 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:56 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 4 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
DTEX read as DTEX InTERCEPT
DTEX (Dtex Systems) read as DTEX InTERCEPT
Forcepoint read as Forcepoint DLP
Microsoft Purview read as Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Microsoft Purview IRM read as Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Mimecast Incydr (formerly Code42 Incydr) read as Code42 Incydr
Securonix read as Securonix UEBA
Splunk User Behavior Analytics read as Splunk UBA
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA) read as Splunk UBA
Varonis read as Varonis Data Security Platform
Varonis Insider Risk Management read as Varonis Data Security Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
BlackFog
Coro Insider Threat Solution
Google Workspace audit logs
Google-native DLP
MetaLimet
Microsoft Purview Suite add-on
Microsoft Purview for Business Premium
Varonis Data Security
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.