7 categories · RankedExabeam
Exabeam is a security log management and SIEM product for cybersecurity and compliance work · exabeam.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Blumira is first at 25%.
Microsoft Sentinel is first at 48%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Sentinel is first at 47%.
Why models recommend it
“Exabeam is recognized as a leading SIEM/UEBA vendor... making it a strong choice for organizations needing comprehensive security operations and insider threat detection.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“A next-generation SIEM that uses behavior-based threat detection... particularly strong for mid-sized companies due to its scalability”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm/Exabeam are the two strongest recommendations from analyst research”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Exabeam Fusion SIEM and IBM QRadar SIEM are the top recommendations”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like Exabeam, DTEX, or Varonis”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“the enterprise platforms [Veriato, DTEX, Proofpoint, Forcepoint, Exabeam] are built for security teams with bigger budgets”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · warning
“More enterprise-leaning (UEBA/SIEM or data governance)... they often require more resources”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
“these are top picks—but they may be pricier or better for more mature security teams”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Exabeam, over the 130 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 71 | 19 | View → | |
| 67 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 1 | View → | |
| 37 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 11 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | View → | |
| 33 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 5 | View → | |
| 29 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Exabeam →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Exabeam's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security operations teams
- Free plan or trial
- free and heavily discounted licensing
- Integrations
- 650
- Customers named
- Resorts World Las Vegas, SA Power Networks, Mizuho Financial Group, Secure Soft, The Football Association, Assurity, Identropy, Grant Thornton
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 110 of the 130 answers that named Exabeam and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
201 of the 267 domain citations in answers naming Exabeam came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 867 | 21 | 2026-09-24 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Podcast or video | 217 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | SIEM, Logs | |
| Report or ebook | 175 | 10 | 2026-09-16 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | 6 | 2026-09-15 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Comparison | 61 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 37 | 2 | 2026-08-28 | SIEM, DLP | |
| Case study | 35 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | 0 | 2024-03-06 | SIEM | |
| News or press | 8 | 5 | 2026-09-23 | SIEM | |
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2023-06-21 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The first government breach by an ai agent wont be the last blog
- 2026-09-23Complacency kills why more discomfort might fix your burnout podcast or video
- 2026-09-23Exabeam accelerates global channel momentum as exabeam apex partner program drives measurable growth news or press
- 2026-09-22Ga technologies case study
- 2026-09-18The player coach ciso engineering trust in ai agents with open source tools podcast or video
- 2026-09-17What openais misalignment reports tell security teams about ai agents blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page exabeam.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.