Insider risk management · RankedTeramind
Teramind is a workforce analytics and insider risk platform · teramind.co ↗
Strongest at small business. Ranked 9 of 80 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 50%.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 45%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 57%.
Why models recommend it
“the platforms that are most consistently called out for mid-market scale, price transparency and low analyst overhead are Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“If you need an affordable, ready-to-use software solution: Go with Teramind or ActivTrak.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Code42 Incydr or Teramind based on your priorities”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“the best insider threat platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be Teramind”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Tools/Types to Approach with High Caution or Avoid: Overly Surveillance-Heavy Tools (e.g., Teramind, Veriato, some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT)”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Flagged for performance issues and limited scalability in large enterprise environments... recommend against its use for large-scale deployments”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Categories to Avoid Entirely ... Teramind”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“Criticisms include heavy surveillance features that raise privacy/ethical flags; better for explicit monitoring but avoid if your focus is behavioral risk without invasiveness.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Teramind, over the 142 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 117 | 61 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 7 | View → | |
| 48 | 0 | View → | |
| 45 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 5 | View → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 30 | 3 | View → | |
| 30 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Teramind →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Teramind's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- CISOs, HR, executives, security and HR teams
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial
- Customers named
- Western Reserve, VIVA, Marble Box, BRMS, Peak Support
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 137 of the 142 answers that named Teramind and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
450 of the 487 domain citations in answers naming Teramind came from a third party's page. Thirty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 168 | 21 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 0 | 2025-07-12 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Workforce planning analytics blog
- 2026-09-24Pharma biotech insider risk blog
- 2026-09-22Workforce planning metrics blog
- 2026-09-21Dtex vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-17Proofpoint vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-15Legal dlp blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teramind.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.