Proofpoint Insider Threat Management is an insider risk management product from Proofpoint · proofpoint.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 50%.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 45%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management is first at 57%.
“start with Purview if you're in M365, or Proofpoint/Varonis for enterprise scale”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“my default recommendation would be Proofpoint Insider Threat Management”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“I recommend Proofpoint ObserveIT as your primary choice”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Consider Proofpoint Insider Threat Management instead if you need broader visibility across endpoint, browser, cloud, email, and web activity”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · alternative
“some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“this is typically a custom-quote enterprise solution, which may be pricier”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Enterprise‑grade, expensive, and focused on investigation‑led workflows.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · warning
“Considerations: Higher price point (~$176K/year per 500 users)”MiniMax M2.5 · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, over the 67 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 27 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 1 | View → | |
| 34 | 7 | View → | |
| 30 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Proofpoint Insider Threat Management →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Proofpoint Insider Threat Management's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 63 of the 67 answers that named Proofpoint Insider Threat Management and are not a share of its labels.
195 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Proofpoint Insider Threat Management came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |