3 categories · RankedCyberhaven
Cyberhaven is a data loss prevention product for enterprises, positioned as data security for the agentic enterprise · cyberhaven.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Purview DLP is first at 51%.
Microsoft Purview DLP is first at 48%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Purview DLP is first at 68%.
Why models recommend it
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Mid-market solutions (e.g., Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Cyberhaven, or DTEX) that balance depth with manageability.”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Cyberhaven for full‑lifecycle data lineage, or Nightfall AI for AI‑native detection with low false positives.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“If you need more advanced features or have significant SaaS usage, Cyberhaven or Nightfall would be stronger choices.”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
“currently lacks integration breadth and cross-domain behavioral coverage compared to leaders”Mistral Small · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Cyberhaven, over the 92 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | 4 | View → | |
| 47 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 37 | 1 | View → | |
| 33 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → | |
| 25 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Cyberhaven →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Cyberhaven's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprise
- Integrations
- 6
- Certifications
- CCPA, GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- US, Worldwide
- Customers named
- Mission Australia, Cooley, Navan, Motorola, Axos Bank, BioIVT, Plaid
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 82 of the 92 answers that named Cyberhaven and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
175 of the 193 domain citations in answers naming Cyberhaven came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 175 | 9 | 2026-09-23 | DLP, SASE | |
| Glossary or explainer | 64 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | SIEM, DLP | |
| Report or ebook | 60 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | DLP | |
| News or press | 38 | 5 | 2026-08-19 | DLP | |
| Comparison | 32 | 9 | 2026-09-25 | DLP, CSPM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | DLP | |
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2024-03-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 2 | 2026-10-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-07 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Ai security vs legacy dlp comparison
- 2026-09-23Data lineage security blog
- 2026-09-21Ai agent data lineage report or ebook
- 2026-09-18Departing employee exfiltration blog
- 2026-09-17Fragment new attack surface blog
Events in person
- October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026Cyberhaven at SecTor 2026Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto, CA · sponsors
- June 3, 2026Private CISO DinnerThe Ned, London, GB · hosted
- June 2, 2026 to June 4, 2026Cyberhaven at Infosecurity Europe 2026ExCeL London, London, GB · exhibited
- June 2, 2026 to June 3, 2026The Breakaway at InfosecTapa Tapa, London, GB · sponsored
- June 1, 2026 to June 3, 2026Cyberhaven at Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit 2026Gaylord National Resort, National Harbor, US · exhibited
As the event pages on cyberhaven.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cyberhaven.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.