Netskope DLP vs Cyberhaven
Zero of fourteen models named Netskope DLP first on the direct prompt; zero named Cyberhaven. Netskope DLP was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Cyberhaven by nine and Netskope DLP carries 27 labels and Cyberhaven 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.
By framing
Netskope DLPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyberhaven
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Netskope DLP and Cyberhaven were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 88 answers naming Netskope DLP and the 92 naming Cyberhaven. In those answers Cyberhaven took the first choice zero times and Netskope DLP zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Netskope DLP Cyberhaven first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Netskope DLP on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Netskope DLP0%#10 of 14Cyberhaven0%#9 of 14Netskope DLP2%#5 of 15Cyberhaven2%#6 of 15Netskope DLP6%#3 of 13Cyberhaven0%#9 of 13What the models said about Netskope DLP
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Mid-market DLP solutions from Microsoft Purview, Proofpoint, Netskope, or Forcepoint often hit the sweet spot” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Modern "Cloud-Native" DLP solutions (like Netskope or Strac) tend to score higher on G2 reviews” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd consider Netskope instead if your main challenge is controlling data across a mix of SaaS apps, web traffic, cloud services, and endpoints.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · alternative
What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need more advanced features or have significant SaaS usage, Cyberhaven or Nightfall would be stronger choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.