Data loss prevention · November 2026 Edition
Cyberhaven vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Zero of fourteen models named Cyberhaven first on the direct prompt; zero named Netwrix Endpoint Protector. Cyberhaven was named by nine of the fourteen models and Netwrix Endpoint Protector by ten and Cyberhaven carries 16 labels and Netwrix Endpoint Protector 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1620A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cyberhaven reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview DLP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview DLP vs Cyberhaven · Microsoft Purview DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector · Safetica ONE vs Cyberhaven
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CyberhavenFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNetwrix Endpoint Protector
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cyberhaven and Netwrix Endpoint Protector stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Cyberhaven Netwrix Endpoint Protector first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cyberhaven on the left and Netwrix Endpoint Protector on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cyberhaven and Netwrix Endpoint Protector stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONE alternatives: Kitecyber, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Netskope Next-Gen DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Strac
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview DLP alternatives: Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: CurrentWare, Safetica ONE
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
Qwen 3.7 FlashSafetica ONE alternatives: DoControl, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Kimi K2Next DLP alternatives: Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONE
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Purview DLP alternatives: Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Cyberhaven0%#9 of 14Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%#5 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Cyberhaven2%#6 of 15Netwrix Endpoint Protector2%#7 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Cyberhaven0%#9 of 13Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%#– of 13What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Look at modern vendors built for mid-market and cloud-first environments (e.g., *Cyberhaven, Nightfall AI, Next DLP, or Code42/Incydr*).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need more advanced features or have significant SaaS usage, Cyberhaven or Nightfall would be stronger choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“customer reviews frequently criticize the platform for slow customer support and a cluttered, unintuitive management console” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Endpoint Protector (Best Overall Value) - This is widely considered the best "value" solution for SMBs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If hardware peripherals (USBs, external drives) and cross-OS local files are your main audit requirement: Evaluate Netwrix Endpoint Protector.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“Endpoint\u2011focused teams with a strong insider\u2011risk program may lean on Netwrix Endpoint Protector or Teramind.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview DLP vs CyberhavenMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorSafetica ONE vs CyberhavenSafetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTeramind DLP vs CyberhavenTeramind DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNightfall AI vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorNetskope DLP vs CyberhavenNetskope DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorCyberhaven vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPNetwrix Endpoint Protector vs Proofpoint Enterprise DLPAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DLP standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.