Insider risk management · November 2026 Edition
Teramind vs Cyberhaven
Two of fourteen models named Teramind first on the direct prompt; zero named Cyberhaven. Teramind was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Cyberhaven by nine and Teramind carries 48 labels and Cyberhaven 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4815A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teramind reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Teramind · Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Cyberhaven · Teramind vs Code42 Incydr
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the insider risk management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeramindFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyberhaven
Direct20
Paraphrase40
Comparative012 against Teramind · 2 against Cyberhaven
Budget-constrained202 against Teramind
Scale-constrained011 against Teramind
Negative005 against Teramind
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teramind and Cyberhaven stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Teramind Cyberhaven first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teramind on the left and Cyberhaven on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teramind and Cyberhaven stood in it.
Teramind first, Cyberhaven not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCyberhaven was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Code42 Incydr, Teramind alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind alternatives: Above Security, DTEX InTERCEPT, Varonis Data Security Platform
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Above Security, Code42 alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind, eMonitor
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Proofpoint Insider Threat Management, Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
Gemini 3.5 FlashCode42 Incydr alternatives: Cyberhaven, DTEX InTERCEPT, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, ManageEngine Log360, Teramind
Grok 4.20Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Code42 Incydr, Cyberhaven, Safetica, Teramind
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Teramind, Varonis Data Security Platform
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Above Security, Code42 Incydr, Safetica, Teramind
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Above Security, Code42 Incydr, DTEX Systems, Teramind
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Safetica Intelligent Data Security Platform, Teramind
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: Forcepoint DLP, OSense, Varonis Data Security Platform
Kimi K2Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management alternatives: DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint Insider Threat Management
GPT-6 LunaCode42 Incydr alternatives: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teramind leads by sixteen points.
Teramind16%#2 of 11Cyberhaven0%#– of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Teramind leads by twelve points.
Teramind14%#2 of 13Cyberhaven2%#7 of 13Enterprise
What the models said about Teramind
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Tools/Types to Approach with High Caution or Avoid: Overly Surveillance-Heavy Tools (e.g., Teramind, Veriato, some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT)” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Flagged for performance issues and limited scalability in large enterprise environments... recommend against its use for large-scale deployments” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Categories to Avoid Entirely ... Teramind” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“the platforms that are most consistently called out for mid-market scale, price transparency and low analyst overhead are Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“If you need an affordable, ready-to-use software solution: Go with Teramind or ActivTrak.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Code42 Incydr or Teramind based on your priorities” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyberhaven
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“currently lacks integration breadth and cross-domain behavioral coverage compared to leaders” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market solutions (e.g., Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Cyberhaven, or DTEX) that balance depth with manageability.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Cyberhaven for full‑lifecycle data lineage, or Nightfall AI for AI‑native detection with low false positives.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs TeramindMicrosoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs CyberhavenTeramind vs Code42 IncydrTeramind vs ActivTrakTeramind vs Proofpoint Insider Threat ManagementTeramind vs ApployeTeramind vs DTEX SystemsCode42 Incydr vs CyberhavenActivTrak vs CyberhavenProofpoint Insider Threat Management vs CyberhavenApploye vs CyberhavenCyberhaven vs DTEX SystemsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full insider risk standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.