November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Security operations › Client-side protection › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Client-side protection for small business buyers

Asked as “client-side protection tool”, and as “tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · cside 17%
19Microsoft Defender for Cloud17cside13Cloudflare Page Shield51others

19% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Defender for Cloud (19%) replaces cside (14% then, 17% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads at 19%, replacing cside, which led at 14% and stands at 17% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%6%31accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 19%
02cside17%0%24accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 14% → 17%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 17%
03Cloudflare Page Shield13%8%25accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 7% → 13%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 13%
04Feroot Security6%19%16accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
05Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security2%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
06Imperva Client-Side Protection2%75%20criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11HUMAN Security0%91%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Feroot PaymentGuard0%60%15criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
09Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%50%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08Source Defense0%50%14criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
07Reflectiz0%48%29criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%
02cside17%
03Cloudflare Page Shield13%
04Feroot Security6%
05Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security2%
06Imperva Client-Side Protection2%
07Reflectiz0%
08Source Defense0%
09Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%
10Feroot PaymentGuard0%
11HUMAN Security0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Imperva Client-Side Protection
75%
15 of 20 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Frequently criticized (up to 44% negative rates); better suited for enterprises with dedicated security teams.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
50%
11 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“High criticism (37–41%); obfuscation can break legitimate functionality, and it's not a strong standalone defense” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Feroot PaymentGuard
60%
9 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Mixed but often criticized for SMBs (20–36% negative); its compliance automation is overkill and expensive” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Reflectiz
48%
14 of 29 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid or Be Cautious About: Reflectiz, Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection... frequently cited as "criticized challengers"” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 845 links across 208 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 94 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · cside37 answers · 77 citations · 13 models
publisher (Gane)35 answers · 55 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 63 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Feroot23 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Microsoft17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge14 answers · 35 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Akamai13 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Reflectiz12 answers · 20 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
cside cside.com
cside 17%, c/side 8%, cside Privacy Watch 2%
26%831,90003,51924
Microsoft Defender microsoft.com
Microsoft Defender for Cloud 19%
19%65918,1003,525145,358,109 company$12,455103
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare Page Shield 13%
13%77550,00010,897
Monity monity.ai
Monity 9%, Monity.ai 2%
11%17
Feroot Security feroot.com6%567014,806$627
Cloudflare cloudflare.com6%421550,00010,8974,995,413111
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 4%
4%26418,1003,525
Bitdefender parent site
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security 2%
2%1790,5003,261
Wazuh wazuh.com2%1189,9004467,2143
OWASP ZAP owasp.org2%1943,600122365,222

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akamai.com, cside.com, g2.com, startupstash.com). The first result for “best client-side protection tool” is imperva.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best client-side protection tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top client-side protection tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best client-side protection tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a client-side protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which client-side protection tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceCloudflare, OWASP ZAPChanged
Two alternativesImperva Skyhigh, Subresource Integrity (SRI) Monitoring
c/side
Four alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Reflectiz
against: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
no first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternativesBitdefender, Sophos Endpoint
against: CrowdStrike Falcon
SecureframeChanged
One alternativeSourcepoint Diagnose
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Three alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Sophos Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, ESET PROTECT
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare Page Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Four alternativesContent Security Policy, CrowdStrike Falcon Go, Feroot Security, Huntress Managed EDR
against: Akamai Page Integrity Manager
Cloudflare Page ShieldChanged
Two alternativesRapidSpike, Reflectiz
against: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security
Seven alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Go, Huntress Managed EDR, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Report URI, Sophos Intercept X, cside
Cloudflare, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Six alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, CentralCSP, JumpCloud, Report URI, Source Defense, cside
against: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, HUMAN Security
no first choiceagainst: AVG, Akamai Page Integrity, Avast Business, CrowdStrike, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Kaspersky, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Perplexity SonarCloudflare Page Shield
Two alternativesJscrambler Webpage Integrity, cside
against: Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection
cside Privacy WatchChanged
One alternativeMonity
against: Cookiebot
Cloudflare Page Shield
Five alternativesDomDog, Feroot PaymentGuard, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Cloudflare Page Shield
One alternativecside
against: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Bot Manager, Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection
Grok 4.20Feroot Security, cside
Two alternativesCloudflare App Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
against: Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
MonityChanged
Two alternativesFeroot Security, cside
against: Detectify, Sucuri
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security
Two alternativesReflectiz, c/side
against: JS-Confuser, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense
Cloudflare Page Shield
Three alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
no first choice
Five alternativesAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Radware Client-Side Protection, Source Defense
against: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Defender for Cloud, cside
One alternativeReflectiz
Monity, c/sideChangedagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection, ReflectizReflectiz, cside
Four alternativesFeroot PaymentGuard, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Source Defense
Malwarebytes, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Four alternativesAVG AntiVirus Free, Avast Free Antivirus, Bitwarden, pfSense Firewall
no first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
DeepSeek V4 Flashc/side
Two alternativesReflectiz, Source Defense
against: Feroot Security, HUMAN Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
csideChanged
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Monity
against: Feroot PaymentGuard, Reflectiz
c/side
Four alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz
Cloudflare Page Shield
Two alternativesSource Defense, cside
against: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, HUMAN Security
cside
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Source Defense
against: Feroot PaymentGuard, Reflectiz
against: Feroot PaymentGuard, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, JS-Confuser, JShaman, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Llama 4 MaverickImperva Client-Side Protection
One alternativecside
MonityChanged
Two alternativesServerScan, cside
no first choiceBitdefender GravityZone Business Security
Two alternativesAvast Business, Norton 360 Deluxe
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternativesESET PROTECT, Sophos Intercept X for Small & Medium Business
against: SentinelOne Singularity
Monity.aiChanged
Two alternativesFeroot Security, cside Privacy Watch
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, cside
Four alternativesCloudflare One, Reflectiz, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Zscaler
against: Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Wazuh
Two alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, ClamAV
no first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Kimi K2Feroot Security, c/side
One alternativeReflectiz
MonityChanged
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard
against: Reflectiz
c/side
Two alternativesFeroot Security, Reflectiz
against: Cloudflare Page Shield
c/side
Three alternativesCloudflare, Content Security Policy, Jscrambler Free PCI DSS Tool
against: Reflectiz
no first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Reflectiz, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare, csideagainst: ReflectizSquirrel PCIChanged
Two alternativesMonity, cside
Feroot Security, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Five alternativesAvast Business Essential Security, Cloudflare Page Shield, CrowdStrike Endpoint Threat Protect, LastPass, Surf Security
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Five alternativesCrowdSec, Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Defender Antivirus, Sophos Intercept X, Wazuh
against: ClamAV, CrowdStrike Falcon Go
no first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
MiniMax M2.5Feroot Security
Four alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz
MonityChanged
Two alternativesSquirrel PCI, cside
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Three alternativesAvast Business Security, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, cside
Three alternativesAvast Business Security, DomDog, ThreatDown
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
One alternativeHuntress Managed EDR
csideChanged
One alternativeReflectiz
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Three alternativesBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Go, Huntress Managed EDR
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
One alternativeBitdefender GravityZone Business Security
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Defender for Cloud, cside
One alternativeFeroot PaymentGuard
against: Imperva Client-Side Protection, Reflectiz
csideChanged
Two alternativesCloudflare Page Shield, Monity Website Script Scanner
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress Managed EDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Cloudflare Page Shield, Script Monitoring
Three alternativesBitdefender Ultimate Small Business Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, cside
against: Imperva Client-Side Protection
no first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, otto-js
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:37no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:30yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:08no018 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:07yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:25yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:30yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:08yes2427 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:19yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:30yes524 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:25yes1524 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:06yes2443 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:10yes1049 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:18yes214 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:31yes2233 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:56no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:55yes24 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:30yes1423 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:02yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:10yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:31yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:26yes2228 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:27yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:45yes518 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:21yes2130 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:44yes23119 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:45yes536 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:54yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:52yes1316 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:46yes1910 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:23yes77 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:14yes621 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:18yes104 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:46yes515 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:18yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:43yes2136 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:22yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:51yes1469 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:40yes2545 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:36yes2475 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:56yes528 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:07yes522 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:34yes1528 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:07no03 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:59no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:16yes1423 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:14yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:40yes57 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:22yes525 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:24yes2428 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:24yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:00no025 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:27yes2528 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:02yes1928 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:01yes1546 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:01yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:03yes2430 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:20no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:19no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:28no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:26yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:15yes915 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:23no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:11yes2349 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:36yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:08no037 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:22yes1040 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:46yes1218 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:24yes539 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:24yes219 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:12yes1531 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:35yes2712 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:01yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:09no019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:52yes109 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:24yes511 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:18yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:21yes2133 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:10yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:21yes533 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:14yes2331 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:05yes2249 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:22yes22106 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:22yes615 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:35yes1934 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client-Side Protection read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Bitdefender GravityZone read as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security
Cloudflare Application Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security (formerly Page Shield) read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security, formerly Page Shield read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Feroot read as Feroot PaymentGuard
Feroot (PaymentGuard & Inspector) read as Feroot PaymentGuard
HUMAN read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (formerly PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Security
Huntress read as Huntress Managed EDR
Imperva read as Imperva Client-Side Protection
Jscrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Jscrambler (Web Page Integrity) read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint P2 read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Radware read as Radware Client-Side Protection
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Sophos read as Sophos Intercept X
Windows Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Windows Defender (Built-in) read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
cside.com read as cside
Unresolved, counted raw
AVG AntiVirus Free
Akamai Page Integrity
Avast Business Essential Security
ByteHide
Cloudflare App Security
Cookiebot
CrowdStrike Endpoint Threat Protect
Google Tag Manager Security Features
Imperva Skyhigh
JShaman
Jscrambler Free PCI DSS Tool
Microsoft SmartScreen
Monity Website Script Scanner
Monity.ai
Norton 360 Deluxe
PageScanner
RapidSpike
Sift Science
Sophos Intercept X for Small & Medium Business
Sourcepoint Diagnose
Subresource Integrity (SRI) Monitoring
WebSentry
isMyCodeSafe.com
pfSense Firewall
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Business continuityComms archiving →