SaaS security posture management for small business buyers
Asked as “SSPM platform”, and as “SaaS security posture management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Nudge Security 20%
29Wing Security20Nudge Security098200.dev43others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Wing Security (29%) replaces Nudge Security (20% then, 20% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Wing Security leads at 29%, replacing Nudge Security, which led at 20% and stands at 20% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Wing Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Wing Security (29%) replaces Nudge Security (20% then, 20% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketWing Security28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
AppOmni54%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
Wing Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Wing Security (29%) replaces Nudge Security (20% then, 20% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketWing Security28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseAppOmni54%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Wing Security29%0%42accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 20% → 29%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 29%
Wing Security29%0%42accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 20% → 29%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 29%02
Nudge Security20%0%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 20% → 20%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 20%
Nudge Security20%0%42accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 20% → 20%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 20%038200.dev9%0%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%
04
SaaS Alerts5%3%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
SaaS Alerts5%3%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%05
SpinOne5%6%32accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
SpinOne5%6%32accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%06
Grip Security4%3%31accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
Grip Security4%3%31accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%07
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps4%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps4%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
DoControl4%15%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
DoControl4%15%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%09
BetterCloud4%30%10criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
BetterCloud4%30%10criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%10
Obsidian Security4%56%18criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Obsidian Security4%56%18criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%11
Valence Security2%21%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Valence Security2%21%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%12AppOmni2%73%45criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
AppOmni2%73%45criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield0%70%23criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield0%70%23criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%15
Zscaler SSPM0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Zscaler SSPM0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14Adaptive Shield0%48%29criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Wing Security vs Adaptive ShieldWing Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldWing Security vs Grip SecurityWing Security vs Valence SecurityNudge Security vs Obsidian SecurityNudge Security vs AppOmniNudge Security vs Adaptive ShieldNudge Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldNudge Security vs Grip SecurityNudge Security vs Valence SecurityObsidian Security vs AppOmniObsidian Security vs Adaptive ShieldObsidian Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldObsidian Security vs Grip SecurityObsidian Security vs Valence SecurityAppOmni vs Adaptive ShieldAppOmni vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldAppOmni vs Grip SecurityAppOmni vs Valence SecurityAdaptive Shield vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldAdaptive Shield vs Grip SecurityAdaptive Shield vs Valence SecurityCrowdStrike Falcon Shield vs Grip SecurityCrowdStrike Falcon Shield vs Valence SecurityGrip Security vs Valence Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102803
040506070809101112Z13
A14
1516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Wing Security29%
Wing Security29%02Nudge Security20%
Nudge Security20%038200.dev9%
04SaaS Alerts5%
SaaS Alerts5%05SpinOne5%
SpinOne5%06Grip Security4%
Grip Security4%07Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps4%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps4%08DoControl4%
DoControl4%09BetterCloud4%
BetterCloud4%10Obsidian Security4%
Obsidian Security4%11Valence Security2%
Valence Security2%12AppOmni2%
AppOmni2%13Zygon0%
14Adaptive Shield0%
15Zscaler SSPM0%
Zscaler SSPM0%16CrowdStrike Falcon Shield0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
AppOmni73%
33 of 45 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“What to avoid (for now) - AppOmni, Adaptive Shield, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield – Excellent tools, but enterprise-priced ... and overkill for a small team.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Adaptive Shield
48%
14 of 29 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid or be cautious about AppOmni, Adaptive Shield, and CrowdStrike Falcon Shield” Mistral Small, negative prompt
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield70%
16 of 23 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“criticized for being more aligned with endpoint and broader security solutions rather than specialized SSPM for small businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Obsidian Security56%
10 of 18 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Cited as leading enterprise SSPM depth alongside AppOmni... not small-team self-service.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 940 links across 196 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 68 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G249 answers · 86 citations · 13 models
publisher (Gane)29 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Nudge Security24 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 39 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow21 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sspm platform”, “sspm platform”, “sspm platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Security wing.security | 29% | 81 | 140 | 52 | 54 | 0 | ||
| Nudge Security nudgesecurity.com | 20% | 122 | 880 | 1 | 18,419 | 28 | ||
| 8200.dev 8200.dev | 9% | 16 | 0 | |||||
| SaaS Alerts saasalerts.com | 5% | 43 | 480 | 12 | 553 | |||
| SpinOne spin.ai | 5% | 45 | 1,300 | 455 | 8,188 | 1 | ||
| Grip Security grip.security | 4% | 89 | 880 | 28 | 5,249 | 17 | 1 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps 4%, Microsoft 365 0%, Microsoft Secure Score 0% | 4% | 123 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| DoControl docontrol.io | 4% | 56 | 320 | 5 | 4,611 | 1 | 7 | |
| BetterCloud bettercloud.com | 4% | 180 | 1,300 | 8 | 26,677 | |||
| Obsidian Security obsidiansecurity.com | 4% | 116 | 2,900 | 63 | 6,765 | $1,460 | 53 | 9 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gbhackers.com, guideflow.com, vcso.ai). The first result for “best sspm platform” is grip.security.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SSPM platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SaaS security posture management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top SSPM platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SSPM platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a SSPM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SSPM platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Wing SecurityNudge SecurityChangedagainst: AppOmni8200.dev, Wing SecurityWing Securityno first choiceagainst: AppOmni, Varonis
Two alternatives
DoControl, SpinOneOne alternative
Adaptive ShieldThree alternatives
AppOmni, Nudge Security, Obsidian SecurityThree alternatives
Adaptive Shield, Kloudle, SpinOneGPT-5.4 miniSpinOneagainst: Netskope SSPMAppOmniChangedSaaS Alertsagainst: Netskope SSPM, Zscaler SSPMSaaS Alertsagainst: Zscaler SSPMno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
SaaS Alerts, elbaOne alternative
PostureThree alternatives
AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, SpinOneTwo alternatives
Augmentt Secure, SpinOneGemini 3.5 FlashNudge Security, Wing Securityagainst: AppOmni, Obsidian SecurityNudge Security, Wing SecurityHeldNudge SecurityWing Securityagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, Obsidianno first choiceagainst: AppOmni, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Prisma Cloud, Varonis
Two alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControlTwo alternatives
Drata, VantaFour alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, SpinOne, Wing SecuritySix alternatives
Drata, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Nudge Security, SpinOne, Steampipe, VantaSix alternatives
DoControl, Drata, Secureframe, SpinOne, Vanta, Wing SecurityPerplexity SonarWing Securityagainst: AppOmniWing SecurityHeldagainst: AppOmni, ObsidianWing SecurityGrip Securityagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, SpinSPMno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, BetterCloud, CrowdStrike, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Torii, Zluri, Zscaler SSPM
Three alternatives
Grip Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Nudge SecurityThree alternatives
DoControl, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Nudge SecurityFive alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Grip Security, Microsoft Defender, Nudge SecurityTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Wing SecurityGrok 4.20BetterCloudagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian, Palo Alto Prisma SSPM, Varonis, Zscaler SSPMRecoChangedSaaS Alerts, SpinOneagainst: AppOmni, CloudEagle.ai, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Lumos, Palo Alto Prisma SSPM, Zscaler SSPMObsidian Securityagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSWing Securityagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Netskope SSPM, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Wiz
Three alternatives
Grip Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, SaaS AlertsFour alternatives
Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CloudEagle.ai, SpinOneTwo alternatives
BetterCloud, ZygonThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Wing Security, ZluriTwo alternatives
Microsoft's own Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian SecurityMistral SmallNudge Security, Wing SecurityNudge Security, Wing SecurityHeldSaaS Alerts, SpinOneWing SecurityVantaagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Valence Security
Three alternatives
8200.dev, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip SecurityOne alternative
Push SecurityFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Zscaler SSPM, ZygonTwo alternatives
Nudge Security, ZluriFive alternatives
Astrix, Drata, Grip Security, SentinelOne, StrongDMDeepSeek V4 FlashNudge Securityagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldNudge SecurityHeldagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, Obsidian8200.devagainst: AppOmniMicrosoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Wing Securityagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Zlurino first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, DoControl, Grip Security, Obsidian Security, SpinOneagainst: AppOmni, BetterCloud, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Prisma Cloud, SpinOne, Valence Security
One alternative
Wing SecurityTwo alternatives
Grip Security, SaaS AlertsFour alternatives
Nudge Security, Reco, Valence Security, Wing SecurityOne alternative
SaaS AlertsFour alternatives
Augmentt, ConnectSecure, Guardz, SaaS AlertsLlama 4 Maverick8200.devno first choiceChanged8200.devDoControl, Grip Security, Obsidian Security, Wing Security, Zlurino first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Veza
Two alternatives
Grip Security, Nudge SecurityFour alternatives
Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, Grip Security, Nudge SecurityQwen 3.7 Flash8200.devOrca SecurityChangedagainst: WizAkeylessWing SecurityGitGuardian, Snykagainst: Forescout, Wizagainst: AppOmni, Obsidian Security, Prisma Cloud, Veza
Two alternatives
Nudge Security, Wing SecurityTwo alternatives
Drata, VantaThree alternatives
BeyondTrust, Delinea, Keeper Enterprise Password ManagerTwo alternatives
SaaS Alerts, ZluriKimi K2Nudge Securityagainst: AppOmni, Prisma Cloud8200.devChangedNudge Security, Obsidian Securityagainst: AppOmniNudge Securityagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Palo Alto Prisma SSPMno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, SaaS Alerts, Valence Security, Veza
Two alternatives
Valence Security, Wing SecurityOne alternative
Wing SecurityTwo alternatives
Adaptive Shield / CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, SaaS AlertsTwo alternatives
BetterCloud, Grip SecurityGLM 4.7 FlashXSpinOneagainst: BetterCloudNudge SecurityChangedSaaS Alertsagainst: AppOmniSaaS Alerts, Valence Securityagainst: AppOmni, CloudEagle.ai, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Palo Alto SSPM, Zscaler SSPMno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CloudEagle.ai, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, DoControl, Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management, Obsidian Security
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian Security, Valence SecurityThree alternatives
Microsoft 365, Valence Security, Wing SecurityFour alternatives
BetterCloud, Reco, Snyk, SpinOneFive alternatives
8200.dev, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nudge Security, SpinOneMiniMax M2.58200.devNudge SecurityChangedagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni8200.dev8200.devno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield
Four alternatives
Grip Security, Nudge Security, Valence Security, Wing SecurityOne alternative
Wing SecurityFive alternatives
AppOmni, Grip Security, Nudge Security, Reco, Wing SecurityThree alternatives
Nudge Security, SaaS Alerts, Wing SecurityGPT-6 LunaWing SecuritySpinOneChangedMicrosoft Defender for Cloud AppsMicrosoft Defender for Cloud Appsno first choiceagainst: AppOmni, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Zscaler SSPM
One alternative
Nudge SecurityOne alternative
Falcon ShieldThree alternatives
AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Nudge SecurityOne alternative
Grip SecurityMuse Glimmer 30BBetterCloud, SaaS AlertsDoControlChangedagainst: SecureframeSaaS Alerts, SpinOneagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Zscaler SSPMWing Securityno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security
Five alternatives
Grip Security, Nudge Security, SpinOne, Wing Security, ZygonThree alternatives
SaaS Alerts, SpinOne, VantaFive alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Valence Security, Wing Security, ZygonFour alternatives
Nudge Security, SaaS Alerts, SpinOne, ZluriBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 22 | 85 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 8 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 1 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 23 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:23 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 19 | 78 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:33 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 22 | 95 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 12 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:05 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:32 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:53 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:42 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:40 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:52 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 22 | 142 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 21 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 21 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM read as CrowdStrike Falcon Shield
Grip read as Grip Security
Netskope read as Netskope SSPM
Nudge read as Nudge Security
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks (e.g., Prisma Cloud SSPM features) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks SSPM read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Prisma SaaS read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Spin.AI read as SpinOne
Spin.ai read as SpinOne
Spin.ai (SpinOne) read as SpinOne
Zscaler read as Zscaler SSPM
Zscaler Advanced SSPM read as Zscaler SSPM
Unresolved, counted raw
Augmentt Secure
Falcon Shield
Google Workspace Security Health Check
Google Workspace audits
Google Workspace's security tools
Microsoft's own Defender for Cloud Apps
Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management
Palo Alto SSPM
Posture
Secure Score
elba
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.