Business continuity management for small business buyers
Asked as “business continuity management platform”, and as “business continuity planning software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Continuity2 14%
29SafetyCulture14Continuity210Fortiv47others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.SafetyCulture held the lead, −17 points on 46%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SafetyCulture29%Contested▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-marketSafetyCulture14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SafetyCulture (14%) replaces LogicManager (24% then, 6% now), 8 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseFusion Risk Management33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
SafetyCulture29%Contested▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-marketSafetyCulture14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SafetyCulture (14%) replaces LogicManager (24% then, 6% now), 8 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseFusion Risk Management33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SafetyCulture29%4%28accepted challenger▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.46% → 29%
SafetyCulture29%4%28accepted challenger▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.46% → 29%02Continuity214%11%44accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 0% → 14%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.0% → 14%
03
Fortiv10%6%34accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%
Fortiv10%6%34accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%04
Preparis8%8%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%
Preparis8%8%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%05
AlertMedia6%0%23accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
AlertMedia6%0%23accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%07
Mitratech Preparis4%13%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Mitratech Preparis4%13%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Sprinto2%4%25accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%
Sprinto2%4%25accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Archer0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience0%92%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience0%92%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15Fusion Risk Management0%75%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10
Noggin0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Noggin0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11Castellan0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09
NAKIVO Backup & Replication0%0%16accepted challengernewNew since October 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication0%0%16accepted challengernewNew since October 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
SafetyCulture vs Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSafetyCulture vs Continuity2SafetyCulture vs Mitratech Preparis
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
SafetyCulture vs LogicManagerSafetyCulture vs PreparisSafetyCulture vs FortivSafetyCulture vs Quantivate Business ContinuityRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Continuity2Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Mitratech PreparisRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs LogicManagerRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs PreparisRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs FortivRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Quantivate Business ContinuityContinuity2 vs Mitratech PreparisContinuity2 vs LogicManagerContinuity2 vs PreparisContinuity2 vs FortivContinuity2 vs Quantivate Business ContinuityMitratech Preparis vs LogicManagerMitratech Preparis vs PreparisMitratech Preparis vs FortivMitratech Preparis vs Quantivate Business ContinuityLogicManager vs PreparisLogicManager vs FortivLogicManager vs Quantivate Business ContinuityPreparis vs FortivPreparis vs Quantivate Business ContinuityFortiv vs Quantivate Business Continuity
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01C02
030405C06
07080910C11
121314F15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01SafetyCulture29%
SafetyCulture29%02Continuity214%
03Fortiv10%
Fortiv10%04Preparis8%
Preparis8%05AlertMedia6%
AlertMedia6%06Crises Control4%
07Mitratech Preparis4%
Mitratech Preparis4%08Sprinto2%
Sprinto2%09NAKIVO Backup & Replication0%
NAKIVO Backup & Replication0%10Noggin0%
Noggin0%11Castellan0%
12MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%13Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience0%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience0%14Archer0%
Archer0%15Fusion Risk Management0%
What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Fusion Risk Management
75%
21 of 28 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Avoid over-engineering: Enterprise platforms like Fusion Risk Management are powerful but likely overkill (and over-budget) for a small team.” Kimi K2, direct prompt
MetricStream Business Continuity Management90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Also criticized (90% negative rate), and is designed for large organizations with complex needs, not lean small business teams.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience92%
12 of 13 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“platforms that are criticized or have a high negative rate include Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Archer100%
12 of 12 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Built for large enterprises; requires dedicated administrators; complex multi-module architecture; expensive licensing model” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 875 links across 136 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Fortiv52 answers · 134 citations · 12 models
49 answers · 79 citations · 12 models
48 answers · 62 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G239 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 38 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · BCMMetrics13 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Mitratech13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 12 models
38 answers · 9 models
38 answers · 9 models
29 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 5 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SafetyCulture safetyculture.com | 29% | 41 | 18,100 | 132 | 466,981 | 1 | ||
| Continuity2 continuity2.com | 14% | 87 | 20 | 0 | ||||
| Fortiv fortiv.io | 10% | 65 | ||||||
| Preparis preparis.com | 8% | 43 | 390 | 13 | 351 | $28 | 9 | |
| AlertMedia alertmedia.com | 6% | 39 | ||||||
| Aptien aptien.com | 6% | 10 | 260 | 1 | 116,286 | 1 | ||
| Crises Control crises-control.com | 4% | 22 | 2 | |||||
| Mitratech mitratech.com Mitratech Preparis 4% | 4% | 42 | 3,600 | 159 | 46,305 company | $10,768 | 106 | |
| RecoveryPlanner | 4% | |||||||
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 2% | 256 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, getapp.com, softwareadvice.co.uk). The first result for “best business continuity management platform” is myhospitalnow.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business continuity management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business continuity planning software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top business continuity management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business continuity management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a business continuity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business continuity management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Continuity2, PreparisPreparisChangedFortivagainst: FusionBCMMetrics, Continuity2no first choiceagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Origami Risk, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360, ServiceNow BCM, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
Fortiv, Noggin, Quantivate Business ContinuityThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Castellan, NogginFive alternatives
Castellan, Continuity2, LogicManager, Preparis, SafetyCultureTwo alternatives
Castellan, FortivGPT-5.4 miniAlertMediaagainst: LogicGate, SprintoAlertMediaHeldEverbridge 360 AI Prepare, Quantivate Business Continuityagainst: MetricStream BCMSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, GlobalSuite, IBM OpenPages, Protecht, SAI360
Two alternatives
Continuity2, Crises ControlThree alternatives
Continuity2, Crises Control, ParaSolutionThree alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Business Continuity ManagementTwo alternatives
Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, SprintoGemini 3.5 FlashPreparisagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk ManagementAgility Recovery, Fortiv, PreparisChangedAgility Recovery, BCMMetrics, Fortivagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMittiagainst: Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceContinuity2, Fortiv, Mitratech Preparisagainst: Archer, Fusion Frameworkagainst: Archer, Continuity Logic, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, Quantivate Business Continuity, ServiceNow BCM
Five alternatives
Fortiv, LogicManager, Quantivate Business Continuity, Sprinto, VantaSix alternatives
Aptien, Continuity2, Drata, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Smartsheet BCP Templates, VantaThree alternatives
Continuity2, Knowella, MittiThree alternatives
BCMMetrics, BCP Builder, FortivFour alternatives
Drata, SafetyCulture, Sprinto, VantaPerplexity SonarContinuity2against: Fusion, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceContinuity2Heldagainst: Fusion, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SafetyCulture, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementContinuity2against: Archer, Fusion, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSafetyCultureagainst: Fortivno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream BCM, Ncontracts, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Business Continuity Management, Veoci
Four alternatives
Fortiv, Noggin, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
Fortiv, Preparis, SprintoFour alternatives
Fortiv, Preparis, Quantivate Business Continuity, SafetyCultureTwo alternatives
NAKIVO Backup & Replication, PreparisGrok 4.20SafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementMitratech PreparisChangedagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementContinuity2, Fortivagainst: Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementBCP Builderagainst: Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, Nogginno first choiceagainst: BC in the Cloud, CrashPlan, Datto SIRIS, Everbridge 360, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, Mitratech, NAVEX IRM, OnQ/Quorum, Preparis, Unitrends Backup and Recovery
Three alternatives
Crises Control, Mitratech Preparis, SprintoTwo alternatives
Continuity2, LogicManagerTwo alternatives
Castellan, NogginSix alternatives
Crises Control, Google Workspace, Mitratech Preparis, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, ResiPlan, SafetyCultureFive alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2, Crises Control, Mitratech Preparis, NogginMistral SmallSafetyCultureSafetyCultureHeldFortivSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Archer, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management
Three alternatives
AlertMedia, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
AlertMedia, Preparis, SprintoSix alternatives
AlertMedia, Castellan, Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, Noggin, PreparisTwo alternatives
NAKIVO Backup & Replication, SprintoDeepSeek V4 FlashFortivagainst: Continuity2SafetyCultureChangedagainst: Archer, Continuity2, Fusion, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceContinuity2, Fortivagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementAptienagainst: Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, NAVEX IRMFortivagainst: Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework System, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream Business Continuity Management
Three alternatives
AlertMedia, Noggin, SprintoOne alternative
Mitratech PreparisTwo alternatives
Castellan, NogginThree alternatives
Carbonite, Fortiv, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationFive alternatives
Aptien, Continuity2, Noggin, Preparis, SafetyCultureLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSafetyCultureChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Archer, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Four alternatives
AlertMedia, Mitratech Preparis, Preparis, SprintoTwo alternatives
LogicManager, RecoveryPlannerQwen 3.7 FlashSafetyCultureagainst: Mitratech PreparisContinuity2, RecoveryPlanner, SprintoChangedDiligentagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSafetyCultureagainst: Mitratech Preparis, Veeam Data Platformno first choiceagainst: BCMS, Duo Safety, Everbridge 360, LogicManager, NAVEX GRC, Veoci
Three alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2, SprintoFour alternatives
Datto SIRIS, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, Spanning Backup, VantaSeven alternatives
Drata, E-Trace, GoCanvas, Microsoft Planner, Process Street, Unit42, VantaThree alternatives
BCM Starter Kit, Fortiv, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationKimi K2AlertMediaagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementSafetyCultureChangedFortivagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementBCM Starter Kitagainst: Continuity2, Fortiv, Fusion Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Continuity Software, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360
Four alternatives
Crises Control, Mitratech Preparis, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, OnspringThree alternatives
BCMMetrics, Mitratech Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
Castellan, Continuity2, NogginThree alternatives
Carbonite, IDrive Business, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationGLM 4.7 FlashXCrises ControlAptienChangedagainst: LogicManager, PreparisFortivSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Archer, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
AlertMedia, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationTwo alternatives
SafetyCulture, SprintoFour alternatives
Continuity2, Noggin, Preparis, SafetyCultureThree alternatives
Aptien, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365MiniMax M2.5SafetyCultureSafetyCultureHeldFortivagainst: NogginContinuity2no first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AlertMedia, Preparis, SprintoThree alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2, PreparisTwo alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2Four alternatives
Fortiv, LogicManager, Preparis, RecoveryPlannerGPT-6 LunaCrises ControlMitratech Preparis PlannerChangedagainst: Everbridge 360 AI PrepareBCMMetricsagainst: Everbridge BC in the CloudContinuSys C‑BCMno first choiceagainst: Drata, Everbridge 360, Fusion's Enterprise Resilience Platform, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta
Two alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2One alternative
Continuity2 Meridian BCMSOne alternative
Mitratech PreparisOne alternative
AptienMuse Glimmer 30BFortivSafetyCultureChangedFortivagainst: Castellan, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceAptien, RecoveryPlannerno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Two alternatives
Continuity2, Mitratech PreparisThree alternatives
Aptien, Continuity2, FortivTwo alternatives
Continuity2, NogginTwo alternatives
LogicManager, SafetyCultureBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:49 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 7 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 4 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 11 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:53 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 11 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 12 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 6 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 8 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 16 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 21 | 389 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 24 | 61 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 23 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 25 | 70 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 21 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 13 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:42 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:13 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:26 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:50 | no | 0 | 61 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:10 | no | 0 | 93 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:13 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:49 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 9 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Everbridge read as Everbridge 360
MetricStream read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
NAKIVO read as NAKIVO Backup & Replication
Quantivate read as Quantivate Business Continuity
Riskonnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow (ITSM/BCM hybrid) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Veeam read as Veeam Data Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
BCMS
CallHub
ContinuSys C‑BCM
Continuity Software
Duo Safety (formerly IDRS)
E-Trace
Fusion's Enterprise Resilience Platform
GoCanvas
KPA
Knowella
Mitratech Preparis Planner
NAVEX GRC (formerly Ethix)
OnQ/Quorum
RecoveryPoint
ResiPlan
Singsys
Smartsheet BCP Templates
Startup BCM
Unit42
Zmanda
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.