Third-party risk management for small business buyers
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Vanta TPRM 30%
38UpGuard30Vanta TPRM05Drata27others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.UpGuard held the lead, −1 point on 39%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
ProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01UpGuard38%11%65endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.39% → 38%
UpGuard38%11%65endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.39% → 38%02
Vanta TPRM30%9%65endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 32% → 30%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.32% → 30%
Vanta TPRM30%9%65endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 32% → 30%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.32% → 30%03
Drata5%5%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Drata5%5%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%05
Whistic2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Whistic2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
Secureframe2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Secureframe2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
SecurityScorecard2%26%34criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
SecurityScorecard2%26%34criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%08
Venminder2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Venminder2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Archer0%100%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%100%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%83%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%83%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12ProcessUnity0%61%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ProcessUnity0%61%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Prevalent0%54%26criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Prevalent0%54%26criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Bitsight0%46%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Bitsight0%46%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Panorays0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Panorays0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203
0405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01UpGuard38%
UpGuard38%02Vanta TPRM30%
Vanta TPRM30%03Drata5%
Drata5%04RiskXchange3%
RiskXchange3%05Whistic2%
Whistic2%06Secureframe2%
Secureframe2%07SecurityScorecard2%
SecurityScorecard2%08Venminder2%
Venminder2%09Panorays0%
Panorays0%10Bitsight0%
Bitsight0%11Prevalent0%
Prevalent0%12ProcessUnity0%
ProcessUnity0%13Archer0%
Archer0%14OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management83%
29 of 35 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following third-party risk management (TPRM) platforms... OneTrust - Issues: Steep learning curve, complex and opaque pricing” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Archer100%
14 of 14 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Avoid (Giant GRC Tools): Platforms like RSA Archer or MetricStream. These are designed for thousands of analysts. They are slow, expensive, and terrible for startups.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt
Bitsight46%
12 of 26 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid or be very cautious with: ... quote-only pricing platforms (SecurityScorecard, BitSight, Black Kite, Panorays, ProcessUnity, Prevalent)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
SecurityScorecard26%
9 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid or be very cautious with: ... quote-only pricing platforms (SecurityScorecard, BitSight, Black Kite, Panorays, ProcessUnity, Prevalent)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 900 links across 178 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · UpGuard38 answers · 90 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ComplyJet31 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · RiskXchange31 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Vanta25 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mitratech20 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sprinto18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Risk Ledger17 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Riskonnect17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com | 38% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 |
| Vanta TPRM vanta.com | 30% | 101 | 72,260 | 120 | |||
| Drata drata.com | 5% | 368 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | |
| Vendorapp vendorapp.co | 5% | 9 | |||||
| RiskXchange riskxchange.co | 3% | 20 | |||||
| Whistic whistic.com | 2% | 37 | 49,500 | 14 | 15,430 | 16 | |
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 2% | 235 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | |
| SecurityScorecard securityscorecard.com | 2% | 133 | 2,400 | 118 | 151,385 | 9 | 7 |
| ComplyJet complyjet.com | 2% | 26 | 90 | 0 | 2,025 | ||
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 2% | 256 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (riskledger.com, riskonnect.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top third-party risk management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5RiskXchange, UpGuardUpGuard, VenminderChangedUpGuardVanta TPRMagainst: Onspringno first choiceagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Three alternatives
Drata, Onspring, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Precoro, ProcurementExpress.com, Secureframe, ZaproThree alternatives
Onspring, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMOne alternative
Strac ComplyGPT-5.4 miniVanta TPRMagainst: UpGuardVanta TPRMHeldSecureframe, Vanta TPRMagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementVanta TPRMagainst: UpGuardno first choiceagainst: ProcessUnity, Wipro Vendor Risk Management
One alternative
SecureframeFive alternatives
Creditsafe, Prevalent, Secureframe, UpGuard, WhisticThree alternatives
Creditsafe, Prevalent, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Creditsafe, SecureframeGemini 3.5 FlashDrata, Vanta TPRMagainst: Aravo, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnityVanta TPRMChangedUpGuardagainst: Aravo, Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementDrata, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, UpGuard, WhisticFive alternatives
Drata, HyperComply, SafeBase, Secureframe, UpGuardSix alternatives
Drata, Nudge Security, Panorays, Vanta TPRM, Venminder, WhisticThree alternatives
Nudge Security, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardThree alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMPerplexity SonarVanta TPRMagainst: Aravo, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, RiskonnectVanta TPRMHeldagainst: UpGuardUpGuardagainst: ProcessUnityUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Riskonnectno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Drata, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRM, Whistic
Two alternatives
Drata, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Drata, SecureframeFour alternatives
Panorays, Risk Ledger, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
RiskXchange, Vanta TPRMGrok 4.20UpGuardagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentUpGuardHeldagainst: Bitsight, Cyber Sierra, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecardUpGuard, Vanta TPRMagainst: MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Resolver, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecardUpGuardagainst: Arcoro, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Resolver, SAP Ariba, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Four alternatives
ProcessUnity, RiskXchange, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
Sprinto, Vanta TPRMFive alternatives
Bitsight, Panorays, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, WhisticThree alternatives
Vanta TPRM, Vendorapp, WhisticThree alternatives
Bitsight, Hyperproof, SecurityScorecardMistral SmallUpGuardVanta TPRM, ZaproChangedVanta TPRMUpGuard, Vendorappno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Two alternatives
SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
ProcurementExpress.com, SprintoFive alternatives
Panorays, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, WhisticOne alternative
RiskXchangeDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnityPanorays, UpGuardagainst: Bitsight, Prevalent, SecurityScorecardUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, WhisticUpGuardagainst: Prevalentagainst: Archer, MetricStream, Ncontracts, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, Scytale, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VendorTrust
Four alternatives
Panorays, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRM, WhisticTwo alternatives
Vanta TPRM, WhisticThree alternatives
Vanta TPRM, Venminder, WhisticThree alternatives
Google Sheets, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Bitsight, Drata, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMLlama 4 MaverickVanta TPRMno first choiceChangedVanta TPRMVendorappno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
RiskXchange, SmartSuite, UpGuardThree alternatives
Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardTwo alternatives
RiskXchange, UpGuardQwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard, Vanta TPRMVanta TPRM, WhisticChangedagainst: Coupa, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SAP AribaEnzuzo, Vanta TPRMagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementVendrioagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementDrata, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMagainst: Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Qualys, Rapid7, Salesforce Add-ons, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Workiva
Six alternatives
Drata, Excel, Kodiak Hub, Precoro, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Panorays, UpGuardThree alternatives
Drata, Vanta TPRM, VirgosoftThree alternatives
Approva, Bitsight, ClearLineKimi K2UpGuardUpGuardHeldUpGuardagainst: Panorays, WhisticComplyJet, TrustLayer Starteragainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, VenminderUpGuardagainst: Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Four alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Exchange, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ThirdPartyTrustTwo alternatives
ComplyJet, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
ThirdProof, Vanta TPRMThree alternatives
SecurityScorecard, ThirdProof, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Vanta TPRM, WhisticGLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuardUpGuardHeldPivot, Vanta TPRMRiskXchange, ThirdProofno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Perimeter 21, SAP Ariba, Vanta TPRM
Three alternatives
ComplyJet, GOAT Risk™, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
Vendor Risk Dashboard, VendorRisk by DiligentSix alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Secureframe, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, WhisticTwo alternatives
Fair TPRM, UpGuardMiniMax M2.5Vanta TPRMUpGuardChangedUpGuardUpGuardagainst: Bitsight, Panorays, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Enzuzo, UpGuard, WhisticTwo alternatives
Sprinto, Vanta TPRMFive alternatives
Bitsight, ComplyJet, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecardTwo alternatives
RiskXchange, WhisticGPT-6 LunaWhistic CoreVanta TPRMChangedDrata TPRM, Vanta TPRMagainst: UpGuardUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow TPRM
Two alternatives
UpGuard, Vanta TPRMOne alternative
Whistic Trust CenterOne alternative
WhisticOne alternative
Vanta TPRMMuse Glimmer 30BSecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityVanta TPRMChangedUpGuard, Vanta TPRMagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecardVendorappno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity
Four alternatives
ComplyJet, Drata, Scytale, VendorappFour alternatives
ComplyJet, Conveyor, Drata, UpGuard Security Questionnaires / Vendor RiskFive alternatives
Drata, RiskXchange, Sprinto, Vendorapp, WhisticTwo alternatives
SecurityScorecard, UpGuardBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 8 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 25 | 90 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 12 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 23 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:02 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 17 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:28 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:04 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 21 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:26 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:18 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:24 | no | 0 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 1 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:01 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:25 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 24 | 173 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:16 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (Enterprise Tiers) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow (GRC Module) read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Vanta read as Vanta TPRM
Vanta (Third-Party Risk module) read as Vanta TPRM
Vanta (Vendor Risk Module) read as Vanta TPRM
Unresolved, counted raw
Approva
Arcoro
Bitsight for Suppliers
CAIQ-Lite
ClearLine
Coupa Risk Aware
Cyble TPRM
Descartes Denied Party Screening
Drata TPRM
EcoVadis
Formalize
GOAT Risk™
Google Sheets or Excel
HyperComply
Kodiak Hub
LogicGate Realize
MXToolbox
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Exchange
Perimeter 21
Pivot
SAP Ariba Supplier Risk
Salesforce Add-ons
Spreadsheet-based tracking
ThirdPartyTrust
TrustLayer Starter
UpGuard Security Questionnaires / Vendor Risk
VSAQ
Vendor Risk Dashboard on GitHub
VendorRisk by Diligent
VendorTrust
Vendrio
Virgosoft
Whistic Core
Whistic Trust Center
Wipro Vendor Risk Management
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.