OT and IoT security for enterprise buyers
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Microsoft Defender for IoT 19%
36Claroty xDome19Microsoft Defender for IoT11Nozomi Networks Guardian34others
36% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Claroty xDome held the lead, +1 point on 35%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Defender for IoT49%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 40% → 49%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Defender for IoT38%Contested▲+17Since October 2026: 21% → 38%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Claroty xDome36%15%65endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.35% → 36%
Claroty xDome36%15%65endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.35% → 36%02Microsoft Defender for IoT19%12%48accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 15% → 19%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 19%
03
Nozomi Networks Guardian11%14%56accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 22% → 11%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.22% → 11%
Nozomi Networks Guardian11%14%56accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 22% → 11%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.22% → 11%04
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%4%28accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%4%28accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%05
Armis Centrix8%18%44accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 8%
Armis Centrix8%18%44accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 8%06
Dragos Platform4%20%50accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
Dragos Platform4%20%50accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%07Palo Alto Networks OT Security4%12%26accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
08
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Tenable OT Security0%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tenable OT Security0%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Fortinet OT Security Platform
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDome vs Armis CentrixClaroty xDome vs Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformClaroty xDome vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Armis CentrixNozomi Networks Guardian vs Tenable OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Armis CentrixFortinet OT Security Platform vs Tenable OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformFortinet OT Security Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformArmis Centrix vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityTenable OT Security vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformTenable OT Security vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityForescout Vistaro Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01M02
03040506P07
0809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Claroty xDome36%
Claroty xDome36%02Microsoft Defender for IoT19%
03Nozomi Networks Guardian11%
Nozomi Networks Guardian11%04Fortinet OT Security Platform9%
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%05Armis Centrix8%
Armis Centrix8%06Dragos Platform4%
Dragos Platform4%07Palo Alto Networks OT Security4%
08Forescout Vistaro Platform2%
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%09Tenable OT Security0%
Tenable OT Security0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Dragos Platform20%
10 of 50 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Armis—typically quote-based” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Armis Centrix18%
8 of 44 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Armis—typically quote-based” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Claroty xDome15%
10 of 65 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Armis—typically quote-based, six-figure enterprise deployments, no public pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Nozomi Networks Guardian14%
8 of 56 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Dragos, Armis—typically quote-based” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 852 links across 218 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 44 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Fortinet30 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks22 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Microsoft17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitHub14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Claroty12 answers · 18 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 36% | 154 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 19% | 19% | 143 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Nozomi Networks Guardian nozominetworks.com | 11% | 127 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | ||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 9% | 9% | 86 | 49,500 | 2,339 | ||||
| Armis Centrix armis.com Armis Centrix 8%, Armis Centrix™ 0% | 8% | 105 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 | |
| Dragos Platform dragos.com | 4% | 112 | 70 | 2 | 9,960 | 0 | ||
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks OT Security 4% | 4% | 64 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| Forescout Vistaro Platform forescout.com | 2% | 56 | 0 | 5,690 | 41 | 2 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Cyber Vision 2% | 2% | 19 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Seceon's Open Threat Management (OTM) platform with aiSecOT360 and SeraAI | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fortinet.com, paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade OT and IoT security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceForescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianChangedNozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT Securityagainst: Claroty xDomeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Cyber Vision, Claroty xDome, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTOne alternative
Fortinet OT Security PlatformGPT-5.4 miniFortinet OT Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDomeClaroty xDomeagainst: Tenable OT Securityno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDomeFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianGemini 3.5 FlashClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianArmis CentrixChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDomeno first choiceagainst: Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT
Five alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTThree alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityPerplexity SonarClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDomeno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Kai, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks’ OT offerings, Tenable OT Security, Tenable One OT Exposure
Two alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Check Point IoT Protect, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianNine alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, TXOne Networks, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, NozomiGrok 4.20Claroty xDomeClaroty xDomeHeldClaroty xDome, Dragos Platformagainst: BeyondTrust, Waterfall SecurityCisco Cyber Visionagainst: Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro PlatformClaroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Armis Centrix, CODESYS, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Siemens Simatic IoT2050, Tenable OT Security
Five alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT SecuritySix alternatives
Armis Centrix, Darktrace, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT SecurityMistral SmallClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformClaroty xDomeChangedArmis CentrixClaroty xDomeagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Acksys, Digi, Geutebrück, MDEX, Teltonika, Unitronics, Xiongmai
Two alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Seceon's Open Threat Management (OTM) platform with aiSecOT360 and SeraAIThree alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, OrdrSix alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianDeepSeek V4 FlashClaroty xDomeClaroty xDomeHeldClaroty xDomeFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Armis Centrix, Dragos Platformno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianSeven alternatives
Armis Centrix™, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianLlama 4 MaverickSeceon's Open Threat Management (OTM) platform with aiSecOT360 and SeraAIno first choiceChangedno first choiceClaroty xDomeno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianQwen 3.7 FlashClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianArmis CentrixChangedDragos PlatformFortinet OT Security Platformno first choiceagainst: Cisco Security Manager, Claroty xDome, Darktrace, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Panorama, Tenable OT Security, Trend Micro
Three alternatives
Dragos Platform, Indorse Technologies, Tenable OT SecurityFive alternatives
Cisco Meraki Dashboard, Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementSix alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianKimi K2Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Securityagainst: DarktraceArmis CentrixChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Hexagon, Industrial Defender, Mission Secure, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoTSix alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable One OT ExposureGLM 4.7 FlashXFortinet OT Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: OvrC Platform
Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Industrial Threat Defense, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro PlatformThree alternatives
Cisco IoT Control Center - Cloud Connect, Palo Alto Networks IoT Device Security, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudSeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Seceon OTM Platform, Tenable OT SecurityOne alternative
Cisco Cyber VisionMiniMax M2.5Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Platformno first choiceChangedClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoT, SCYTHEno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Check PointSeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Rockwell AutomationGPT-6 LunaClaroty xDomeClaroty xDomeHeldClaroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Two alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis from ServiceNow, CTD, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Cyber Vision, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTMuse Glimmer 30BClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDomeAccess Gate, Microsoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, ServiceNow
Three alternatives
Cisco, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security PlatformThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Nozomi Networks Guardian, VantageSeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT SecurityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:37 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:28 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:13 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:32 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 15 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:52 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:37 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:48 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:48 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 24 | 61 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 17 | 44 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 18 | 56 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 16 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:14 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 25 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:17 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:20 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:33 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:04 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 15 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:48 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 1 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:31 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:13 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Centrix) read as Armis Centrix
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (Management Platform) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (now part of IBM) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome/CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome/Platform) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty Platform read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout (Vistaro) read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout (eyeInspect / XIoT Platform) read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout Platform read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiOT) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiSIEM / Secure Accelerator) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Microsoft (Defender for IoT) read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian / Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian/Visualize) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Nozomi NTA) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage / Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto (Industrial OT) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (Cloud NGFW) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (Industrial OT Security or IoT Security) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (OtoDom/Unit 42) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT Security read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Tenable read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable OT read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Access Gate
Armis Centrix™
Armis from ServiceNow
CODESYS
CTD
Check Point IoT Protect
Cisco Industrial Threat Defense
Cisco IoT Control Center - Cloud Connect
Cisco Security Manager
Fortinet FortiEDR for OT
Geutebrück
Hexagon
Indorse Technologies
Industrial Defender
Kai
Mission Secure
NetRise
OvrC Platform (Snap One)
Palo Alto Networks Industrial
Palo Alto Networks IoT Device Security
Palo Alto Networks’ OT offerings
Seceon OTM Platform
Siemens Simatic IoT2050
Tenable One OT
Xiongmai
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.