SOAR platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SOAR platform”, and as “security orchestration and automated response tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55Cortex XSOAR09IBM QRadar SOAR09Tines28others
55% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+14Since October 2026: 41% → 55%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Cortex XSOAR held the lead, +14 points on 41%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Tines41%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 43% → 41%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTines47%Clear leader▲+6Since October 2026: 41% → 47%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Cortex XSOAR55%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 41% → 55%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
Tines41%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 43% → 41%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTines47%Clear leader▲+6Since October 2026: 41% → 47%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCortex XSOAR55%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 41% → 55%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Cortex XSOAR55%30%79criticized default▲+14Since October 2026: 41% → 55%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.41% → 55%
Cortex XSOAR55%30%79criticized default▲+14Since October 2026: 41% → 55%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.41% → 55%02Tines9%10%51accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 9%
Tines9%10%51accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 9%03
IBM QRadar SOAR9%35%43criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%
IBM QRadar SOAR9%35%43criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%04
D3 Security Smart SOAR6%18%11accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
D3 Security Smart SOAR6%18%11accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05
Microsoft Sentinel4%7%46accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Microsoft Sentinel4%7%46accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%06
Splunk SOAR4%30%73criticized challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 16% → 4%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.16% → 4%
Splunk SOAR4%30%73criticized challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 16% → 4%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.16% → 4%07
Swimlane Turbine2%8%40accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Swimlane Turbine2%8%40accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%08
Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set2%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set2%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Torq0%6%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Torq0%6%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
FortiSOAR0%5%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
FortiSOAR0%5%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
ServiceNow Security Operations0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Security Operations0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Security Operations SOAR is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Tines vs ManageEngine Log360Tines vs Splunk SOARTines vs TorqTines vs Rapid7 InsightConnectShuffle vs Swimlane TurbineShuffle vs Cortex XSOARShuffle vs ManageEngine Log360Shuffle vs Splunk SOARShuffle vs TorqShuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs Cortex XSOARSwimlane Turbine vs ManageEngine Log360Swimlane Turbine vs Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbine vs TorqSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs ManageEngine Log360Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOARCortex XSOAR vs TorqCortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectManageEngine Log360 vs Splunk SOARManageEngine Log360 vs TorqManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSplunk SOAR vs TorqSplunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectTorq vs Rapid7 InsightConnect
One product takes 55% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Cortex XSOAR30%
24 of 79 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid new investment in: Google Siemplify standalone (product discontinued) and be very cautious with IBM QRadar SOAR ... and Cortex XSOAR (impending forced migration to AgentiX within XSIAM).” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Splunk SOAR30%
22 of 73 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Your Use Case | Splunk SOAR | Primarily per-seat licensing — adding thousands of users becomes extremely costly” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
IBM QRadar SOAR35%
15 of 43 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Large enterprises should be highly cautious of IBM Security SOAR, specifically due to security vulnerabilities and end-of-life (EoL) status.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Microsoft Sentinel7%
3 of 46 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“To avoid budget variance, you generally want to stay away from Consumption-Based (Usage) models.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 886 links across 209 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 57 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
37 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
28 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
27 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
21 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Strike4820 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks19 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CloudSEK19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Intezer15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 9 models
28 answers · 12 models
24 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best soar platform”, “soar platform”, “soar platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex cortex.io Cortex XSOAR 55% | 55% | 165 | 390 | 14 | 16,782 | 6 | |
| Tines tines.com Tines 9%, Tines 3B 2% | 11% | 168 | 22,200 | 3,167 | 10,888 | 97 | |
| IBM parent site IBM QRadar SOAR 9% | 9% | 86 | 201,000 | 34,098 | |||
| D3 Security d3security.com D3 Security Smart SOAR 6% | 6% | 19 | 838 company | 15 | |||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Sentinel 4% | 4% | 371 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Splunk parent site Splunk SOAR 4% | 4% | 177 | 40,500 | 6,832 | |||
| Swimlane Turbine swimlane.com | 2% | 136 | 50 | 0 | 15,132 | 37 | 6 |
| Google Security Operations google.dev Google Security Operations SOAR 2% | 2% | 38 | 390 | 5 | 881,346 company | 109 | |
| D3 Morpheus | 2% | 20 | 0 | ||||
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM 2% | 2% | 86 | 40,500 | 1,088 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best soar platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOAR platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security orchestration and automated response tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SOAR platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOAR platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SOAR platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SOAR platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARChangedCortex XSOARagainst: Microsoft SentinelD3 Security Smart SOAR, IBM QRadar SOARagainst: Cortex XSOARno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security OperationsSix alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqGPT-5.4 miniCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARIBM QRadar SOARagainst: Cortex XSOARno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Sentinel
Five alternatives
FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARFive alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Incident Response, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TorqOne alternative
FortiSOARGemini 3.5 FlashCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbineagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Apache Airflow, Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Google Cloud SecOps, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Four alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesFour alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqFive alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqThree alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, Tines, TracecatPerplexity SonarCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARGoogle Security Operations SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tinesno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Six alternatives
FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesFour alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqNine alternatives
FortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel with Logic Apps, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqOne alternative
D3 Security Smart SOARGrok 4.20Cortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldagainst: BlinkOps, D3 Security Smart SOARCortex XSOARagainst: IBM QRadar SOARTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane TurbineCortex XSOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR, TheHive
Three alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane TurbineThree alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARFour alternatives
FortiSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, TorqTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnectFive alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqMistral SmallCortex XSOARCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARChangedSplunk SOARCortex XSOARagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Four alternatives
FortiSOAR, ServiceNow Security Incident Response, Splunk SOAR, TinesTwo alternatives
Stellar Cyber Human-Augmented Autonomous SOC, TinesFive alternatives
FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, TinesDeepSeek V4 FlashCortex XSOAR, Microsoft SentinelCortex XSOARChangedCortex XSOARSecuronix SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Siemplify, IBM QRadar SOAR, Salesforce, Splunk SOAR
Three alternatives
Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesFour alternatives
FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARSix alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqOne alternative
Swimlane TurbineLlama 4 MaverickCortex XSOARno first choiceChangedno first choiceCortex XSOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Three alternatives
Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, TinesQwen 3.7 FlashCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARD3 Security Smart SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tinesno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Tinesagainst: Cisco Secure, IBM QRadar SOAR, Lacework SOAR modules, QRadar SOAR, StackStorm, Trend Micro, Tufin, Wazuh
Three alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
ManageEngine Log360, Swimlane TurbineTwo alternatives
Fortinet, Microsoft SentinelKimi K2Cortex XSOARagainst: IBM QRadar SOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TorqD3 Security Smart SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Siemplify, IBM QRadar SOAR, Palo Alto XSOAR 6.x, Splunk SOAR, TheHive 3.x / 4.x
Four alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqFour alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesSix alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqOne alternative
Swimlane TurbineTwo alternatives
Swimlane Turbine, TorqGLM 4.7 FlashXno first choiceCortex XSOARChangedno first choiceTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cisco, Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Nine alternatives
BlinkOps, FortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, KnowBe4 PhishER, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Microsoft SentinelMiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOARMicrosoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAMChangedCortex XSOARIBM QRadar SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torqno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
Six alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TorqThree alternatives
Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TorqSeven alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesOne alternative
FortiSOARGPT-6 LunaTinesCortex XSOARChangedno first choiceTines 3Bno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR SaaS, Splunk SOAR
Three alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, TinesTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARMuse Glimmer 30BCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARD3 Morpheus, IBM QRadar SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Chronicle SOAR, Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Phantom, Splunk SOAR
Two alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARFive alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqOne alternative
Swimlane TurbineBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:23 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:36 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 21 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:36 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 9 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 9 | 57 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:12 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:40 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:37 | yes | 20 | 74 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 5 | 55 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 17 | 16 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:04 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:10 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 22 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:40 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 24 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 14 | 78 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 22 | 118 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 18 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:56 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:52 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:53 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 25 | 61 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:28 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:18 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:18 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 25 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 20 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 23 | 95 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
D3 Security read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
D3 Security (Smart SOAR) read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
Exabeam read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Google SecOps (Chronicle SOAR) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle SOAR) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations (Chronicle SOAR) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations (formerly Google Chronicle SOAR) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel + Logic Apps read as Microsoft Sentinel
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR (Current versions) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks (XSOAR) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
ServiceNow SecOps read as ServiceNow Security Operations
Splunk read as Splunk SOAR
Swimlane read as Swimlane Turbine
Swimlane (Turbine) read as Swimlane Turbine
Unresolved, counted raw
Chronicle SOAR
Dropzone
Google Chronicle Security Operations (formerly Siemplify)
IBM QRadar SOAR SaaS
Lacework SOAR modules
Microsoft Sentinel with Logic Apps
Palo Alto XSOAR 6.x
Palo Alto's AgentiX
Prophets
QRadar SOAR (legacy)
TIBCO SOAR (formerly Splunk Phantom)
TIBCO Tufin
Tenable .soar
TheHive 3.x / 4.x (Open Source)
Tines 3B
Trellix SOAR
WeSoar
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.