November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Security operations › SOAR · November 2026 Edition

SOAR platforms

Asked as “SOAR platform”, and as “security orchestration and automated response tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Tines14Shuffle08Cortex XSOAR31others

47% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 41% → 47%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Tines held the lead, +6 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Tines47%0%57endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 41% → 47%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 47%
02Shuffle14%0%15accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 18% → 14%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 14%
03Swimlane Turbine8%9%44accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%
04Cortex XSOAR8%45%60criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 8%
05ManageEngine Log3604%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06Splunk SOAR4%35%57criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07Torq2%11%36accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
08Rapid7 InsightConnect2%11%19accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
09Tracecat2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10FortiSOAR2%22%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13IBM QRadar SOAR0%43%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Microsoft Sentinel0%5%43accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations SOAR is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Tines47%
02Shuffle14%
03Swimlane Turbine8%
04Cortex XSOAR8%
05ManageEngine Log3604%
06Splunk SOAR4%
07Torq2%
08Rapid7 InsightConnect2%
09Tracecat2%
10FortiSOAR2%
11Microsoft Sentinel0%
12Google Security Operations SOAR0%
13IBM QRadar SOAR0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk SOAR
35%
20 of 57 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise-heavy tools like Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or FortiSOAR” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Cortex XSOAR
45%
27 of 60 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise-heavy tools like Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or FortiSOAR” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
IBM QRadar SOAR
43%
12 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Palo Alto announced End-of-Life for QRadar SaaS offerings. Customers are being directed to migrate to Cortex XSIAM/XSOAR.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Torq
11%
4 of 36 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“While newer, it has a 30% negative rate, with some users reporting integration and scalability issues” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 810 links across 196 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 57 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

29 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · KnowBe421 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Strike4821 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks18 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Tracecat16 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best soar platform”, “soar platform”, “soar platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Tines tines.com47%16822,2003,16710,88897
Shuffle shuffler.io14%4560,50019,5501,726
Swimlane Turbine swimlane.com8%13650015,132376
Cortex cortex.io
Cortex XSOAR 8%
8%1653901416,7826
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Log360 4%
4%1398,100675
Splunk parent site
Splunk SOAR 4%
4%17740,5006,832
Torq torq.io2%986,6001,4675,9666
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightConnect 2%
2%5814,800798
Tracecat tracecat.com2%14
FortiSOAR fortinet.com2%48210153,078,109613

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best soar platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SOAR platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security orchestration and automated response tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top SOAR platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOAR platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SOAR platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SOAR platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect
Two alternativesSplunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
TinesChanged
Two alternativesFortiSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Cortex XSOAR
Six alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq
no first choice
Nine alternativesDFIR-IRIS, Logsign, Microsoft Sentinel, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR Community Edition, TheHive, Tines, Torq, Tracecat
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR
GPT-5.4 miniTines
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
FortiSOARChanged
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Six alternativesFortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
Shuffle
One alternativeTracecat
against: Splunk SOAR Community Edition
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines
Six alternativesMicrosoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Fusion, Microsoft Logic Apps / Sentinel Automation, Shuffle, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Five alternativesIBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
Shuffle
Five alternativesAzure Logic Apps, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR Community Edition, TheHive + Cortex, Tines
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps, Phantom, Resilient
Perplexity SonarTines
Four alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR
TinesHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Ten alternativesCyware, FortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, ThreatConnect, Tines, Torq
Tines
Three alternativesLogsign, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Tracecat
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR
Grok 4.20Tines
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOARChanged
Four alternativesBlinkOps, Cortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Tines
against: IBM QRadar SOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Eight alternativesFortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Sumo Logic Cloud SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
against: TheHive
Tracecat
Five alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenSOAR, Shuffle, Tines
against: BlinkOps, Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Tines, Torq
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR
Mistral SmallTines
Three alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
no first choiceTines
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines
Two alternativesSplunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR
Swimlane TurbineChanged
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choiceShuffle, Tines
Three alternativesBlumira, ManageEngine Log360, Tracecat
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq
no first choice
Five alternativesFortiSOAR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, DFLabs, FortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR
Llama 4 MaverickTines
Five alternativesCortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
no first choiceChangedCortex XSOAR
Two alternativesSplunk SOAR, Tines
Logsign
Two alternativesBlinkOps, ManageEngine Log360
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR
TinesChanged
Three alternativesD3 Security Smart SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Shuffle, Tines
Four alternativesBlumira, ManageEngine Log360, StackStorm, TheHive + Cortex
against: Wazuh
no first choice
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender XDR, Tines, runZero
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
Kimi K2Tines
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, ORNA
TinesHeld
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR
Cortex XSOAR
Five alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
Shuffle
Three alternativesLogsign Unified SO Platform, OpenSOAR, Tracecat
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, Splunk SOAR
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR
Four alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Cortex XSOARHeld
Four alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Tines
Cortex XSOAR
Seven alternativesFortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq
ManageEngine Log360
Five alternativesLogsign, OpenSOAR, Shuffle, Tines, Tracecat
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
TinesChanged
Three alternativesSplunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
no first choiceManageEngine Log360
Four alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Securonix SOAR, Splunk SOAR
GPT-6 LunaTines
Three alternativesDefender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
TinesHeld
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Torq
Cortex XSOAR, Tines
Six alternativesFortiSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Shuffle
Three alternativesPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, TheHive, Tines
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR 6.12 or 6.13 on-premises, IBM QRadar SOAR in the cloud, QRadar SOAR on-premises
Muse Glimmer 30BTines
Four alternativesManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine
Swimlane Turbine, TinesChanged
Five alternativesCortex XSOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Cortex XSOAR
Six alternativesIBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
OpenSOAR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Shuffle, TheHive
Four alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
no first choiceagainst: Cortex AgentiX, Cortex XSOAR, Google Siemplify, IBM QRadar SOAR, Logpoint, ManageEngine, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:55yes1412 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:11yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:54yes1122 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:44yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:26yes1318 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:20yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:05yes2427 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:52yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:06no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:03yes1957 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:31yes1733 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:17yes517 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:22yes317 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:14yes1015 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:14yes189 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:33yes56 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:39no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:20yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:21yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:55yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:53yes2027 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:42yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:00yes517 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:30yes1035 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:43yes1222 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:57yes928 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:38yes315 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:46yes1520 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:31yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:00yes27 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:45no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:15yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:20yes514 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:17yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:03yes2434 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:51yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:36no030 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:39yes1850 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:03yes2547 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:14yes1036 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:15yes829 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:19yes1322 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:07yes99 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:55yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:54yes1023 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:13yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:31yes1517 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:25yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:17yes2522 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:16yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:29yes1041 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:43yes1031 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:53yes1431 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:27yes522 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:35yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:07yes1517 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:39yes1814 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:58no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:22no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:27yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:00yes1016 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:44no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:24yes2148 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:19yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:23no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:30yes1427 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:46yes1423 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:47no048 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:57yes218 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:08no08 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:26yes1812 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:53yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:51yes1025 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:32yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:13yes1416 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:58yes57 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:23yes2442 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:35yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:44yes943 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:22yes2369 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:55yes2553 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:17yes1553 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:10yes316 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:31yes1524 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
D3 read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
D3 Security read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
Exabeam read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel + Logic Apps read as Microsoft Sentinel
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR (formerly Demisto) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex XSOAR) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR (formerly Demisto) read as Cortex XSOAR
Rapid7 (InsightConnect) read as Rapid7 InsightConnect
ServiceNow SecOps read as ServiceNow Security Operations
Splunk read as Splunk SOAR
Splunk Free read as Splunk SOAR
Swimlane read as Swimlane Turbine
Swimlane (Swimlane Turbine) read as Swimlane Turbine
Swimlane (Turbine) read as Swimlane Turbine
Unresolved, counted raw
Barracuda Incident Response
Cortex XSOAR 6.12 or 6.13 on-premises
Cortex XSOAR Community
CrowdStrike Falcon Fusion
Cyware Orchestrate
DFIR-IRIS
DFLabs
Google Chronicle Security Operations / Siemplify
IBM QRadar SOAR in the cloud
IncMan SOAR
InsightConnect
ManageEngine Log360 native SOAR
Microsoft Defender SOAR
Microsoft Logic Apps / Sentinel Automation
Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps
Microsoft's Sentinel
NetWitness SOAR
OpenText ArcSight SOAR
QRadar SOAR on-premises
Resilient
SynapCores SOAR
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← SIEMTPRM →