Penetration testing as a service
Asked as “penetration testing service”, and as “pentest-as-a-service provider”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Cobalt16Astra Security10BreachLock28others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 45% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Cobalt held the lead, +1 point on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Stingrai22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Stingrai (22%) replaces Cobalt (17% then, 13% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Cobalt46%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 45% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
NetSPI30%Contested▼−16Since October 2026: 46% → 30%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
Stingrai22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Stingrai (22%) replaces Cobalt (17% then, 13% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketCobalt46%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 45% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseNetSPI30%Contested▼−16Since October 2026: 46% → 30%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Cobalt46%0%47endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 45% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 46%
Cobalt46%0%47endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 45% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 46%02
Astra Security16%0%24accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 4% → 16%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.4% → 16%
Astra Security16%0%24accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 4% → 16%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.4% → 16%03
BreachLock10%0%36accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 19% → 10%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 10%
BreachLock10%0%36accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 19% → 10%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 10%04Stingrai6%0%17accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
Stingrai6%0%17accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05NetSPI4%9%22accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
NetSPI4%9%22accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
Bishop Fox2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Bishop Fox2%8%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Intruder2%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Intruder2%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08Raxis2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Bugcrowd PTaaS0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11HackerOne PTaaS0%15%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
10
Rapid70%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Rapid70%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Synack0%5%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Synack0%5%19accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Cobalt vs NetSPICobalt vs Bishop FoxCobalt vs IntruderCobalt vs RaxisAstra Security vs BreachLockAstra Security vs StingraiAstra Security vs NetSPIAstra Security vs Bishop FoxAstra Security vs IntruderAstra Security vs RaxisBreachLock vs StingraiBreachLock vs NetSPIBreachLock vs Bishop FoxBreachLock vs IntruderBreachLock vs RaxisStingrai vs NetSPIStingrai vs Bishop FoxStingrai vs IntruderStingrai vs RaxisNetSPI vs Bishop FoxNetSPI vs IntruderNetSPI vs RaxisBishop Fox vs IntruderBishop Fox vs RaxisIntruder vs Raxis
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607R08
0910H11
B12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Cobalt46%
Cobalt46%02Astra Security16%
Astra Security16%03BreachLock10%
BreachLock10%04Stingrai6%
Stingrai6%05NetSPI4%
NetSPI4%06Bishop Fox2%
Bishop Fox2%07Intruder2%
Intruder2%08Raxis2%
09Synack0%
Synack0%10Rapid70%
Rapid70%11HackerOne PTaaS0%
12Bugcrowd PTaaS0%
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bugcrowd PTaaS
18%
2 of 11 labels negative · 2 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid - Synack/Bugcrowd/HackerOne” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
HackerOne PTaaS
15%
2 of 13 labels negative · 2 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid - Synack/Bugcrowd/HackerOne” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Acunetix29%
2 of 7 labels negative · 2 of 14 models
“Do you only want an automated scan (like Intruder or Acunetix)? *Warning: ... requires a provider that includes manual hacking.*” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Intruder15%
2 of 13 labels negative · 2 of 14 models
“Do you only want an automated scan (like Intruder or Acunetix)? *Warning: For true B2B credibility, you almost always need human-exploitable proof*” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 699 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Stingrai28 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netragard19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Synack17 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · DeepStrike17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Atlant Security14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Clutch10 answers · 10 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Cobalt9 answers · 11 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best penetration testing service”, “penetration testing service”, “penetration testing services”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalt cobalt.io | 46% | 127 | 135,000 | 27,732 | 23,655 | 14 | ||
| Astra getastra.com Astra Security 16% | 16% | 85 | 590 | 20 | 60,832 company | $17,489 | 75 | 5 |
| BreachLock breachlock.com | 10% | 81 | 590 | 6 | 2,479 | 22 | ||
| Stingrai stingrai.io | 6% | 53 | 201,000 | 23,274 | 70 | |||
| TurboPentest turbopentest.com | 6% | 12 | ||||||
| NetSPI netspi.com | 4% | 67 | 1,900 | 58 | 4,142 | $336 | 43 | |
| Bishop Fox bishopfox.com | 2% | 44 | 1,600 | 18 | 23,962 | 1 | ||
| Intruder intruder.io | 2% | 291 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| Raxis raxis.com | 2% | 22 | 320 | 5 | ||||
| HIFENCE hifence.com | 2% | 8 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (reddit.com, synack.com). The first result for “best penetration testing service” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best penetration testing service for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which pentest-as-a-service provider would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top penetration testing services and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best penetration testing service for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a penetration testing service. What should we look at?”Negative“Which penetration testing services should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceCobaltChangedno first choiceBreachLockno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BreachLock, Packetlabs, Rapid7Three alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, Rapid7Three alternatives
Kualitatem, Qualysec, UnderDefenseGPT-5.4 miniNetSPINetSPIHeldno first choiceAstra Securityagainst: ThreatSpikeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Appsecco, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, PacketlabsFive alternatives
Astra Security, Bugcrowd PTaaS, Muster, Sprocket Security, StingraiOne alternative
Bugcrowd Standard Pen TestGemini 3.5 FlashCobaltCobaltHeldCobaltAstra Securityagainst: Mandiant, NCC Group, Tenable Nessusno first choiceagainst: Qualys, Tenable Nessusnothing named
Three alternatives
BreachLock, NetSPI, SynackThree alternatives
BreachLock, HackerOne PTaaS, Horizon3.ai NodeZeroEleven alternatives
Bishop Fox, BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, CrowdStrike Services, HackerOne PTaaS, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Mandiant, NetSPI, Palo Alto Networks, Pentera, SynackFour alternatives
BreachLock, Cobalt, Intruder, Vonahi Security vPenTestPerplexity SonarCobaltCobaltHeldagainst: Bishop Fox, NetSPIno first choiceAstra Security, Intruderno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Coalfire, NetSPI, Raxis, StingraiThree alternatives
BreachLock, DeepStrike, Software SecuredFourteen alternatives
Astra Security, Bishop Fox, BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, Coalfire, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, IBM X-Force Red, Mandiant, NCC Group, NetSPI, Pentera, SynackFive alternatives
Atlant Security, BreachLock, Packetlabs, Raxis, SecarmaGrok 4.20BreachLockBreachLockHeldagainst: Bugcrowd PTaaS, HackerOne PTaaS, NetSPI, Rapid7Astra Security, BreachLockagainst: Acunetix, Intruder, InvictiStingraino first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cobalt, Rapid7Two alternatives
Cobalt, RaxisSix alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, CrowdStrike, NetSPI, Rapid7, SynackFour alternatives
CISA, HIFENCE, Kobalt.io, Triaxiom SecurityMistral SmallCobaltAstra Security, CobaltChangedAstra SecurityHIFENCE, TurboPentestno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BreachLock, NetSPI, StingraiTwo alternatives
BreachLock, CybriEight alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, ImmuniWeb, Intruder, Invicti, NCC Group, NetSPI, SynackOne alternative
StingraiDeepSeek V4 FlashBreachLock, CobaltCobaltChangedno first choiceRaxis, Stingraino first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Baker Tilly, Cherry Bekaert, RSM, Rapid7, Sprocket Security, StingraiThree alternatives
BreachLock, Intruder, Sprocket SecurityEleven alternatives
Astra Security, Bishop Fox, BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, Coalfire, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, Mandiant, NCC Group, Synack, TrustedSecTwo alternatives
Indusface WAS, Pentest-Tools.comLlama 4 MaverickCobaltCobaltHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BreachLock, Intigriti, Raxis, StingraiQwen 3.7 FlashBishop Fox, Cobaltagainst: Deloitte, KPMGAstra Security, CobaltChangedagainst: Acunetix, IntruderAstra Security, NetSPICobaltagainst: Accenture, KPMGno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
HackerOne PTaaS, Lattice Security, NCC Group, Secureworks, TrustedSecOne alternative
SecurityMetricsFive alternatives
Acunetix, Cobalt, Intruder, Invicti, SynackFour alternatives
ImmuniWeb, OWASP ZAP, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementKimi K2BreachLock, CobaltCobaltChangedagainst: Bugcrowd PTaaS, HackerOne PTaaS, SynackBreachLock, CobaltCobalt, Red Sentryno first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
One alternative
StingraiThree alternatives
BreachLock, Edgescan, NetSPISix alternatives
Acunetix, Astra Security, Intruder, Invicti, Netragard, PacketlabsThree alternatives
HIFENCE, TurboPentest, Vonahi Security vPenTestGLM 4.7 FlashXAstra SecurityCobaltChangedno first choiceTurboPentestno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Blaze InfoSec, Cobalt, SecurityMetricsFour alternatives
Bishop Fox, BreachLock, DeepStrike, EthiackFour alternatives
Affordable Pentesting, Budget Security, Hacksessible, Target DefenseMiniMax M2.5Astra SecurityAstra Security, CobaltChangedBreachLock, Cobaltno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BreachLock, Cobalt, Intruder, StingraiTwo alternatives
Software Secured, UnderDefenseThree alternatives
Bishop Fox, NCC Group, NetSPIGPT-6 LunaCobaltCobaltHeldNCC Group, NetSPIKobalt.iono first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Bishop Fox, NetSPITwo alternatives
BreachLock, SynackThree alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, SynackOne alternative
CobaltMuse Glimmer 30BCobaltCobaltHeldAstra SecurityStingrai, TurboPentestno first choiceagainst: EY, Rapid7, Trustwave
Seven alternatives
BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, HackerOne PTaaS, NetSPI, Rapid7, Stingrai, SynackTwo alternatives
BreachLock, NetSPIFour alternatives
BreachLock, Cobalt, Intruder, InvictiTwo alternatives
Atlant Security, HIFENCEBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:04 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:08 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:32 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:48 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:26 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:12 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 10 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:54 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:31 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 17 | 137 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:00 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:27 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:37 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:54 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 20 | 126 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:16 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:00 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Astra read as Astra Security
Bugcrowd read as Bugcrowd PTaaS
HackerOne read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne (Enterprise) read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne Pentest read as HackerOne PTaaS
Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Vonahi read as Vonahi Security vPenTest
Unresolved, counted raw
AegisPen
Appsecco
Beyond Key
Blaze InfoSec
BreachLock Inc
Bugcrowd Standard Pen Test
CyberCX
CyberHunter
Hacksessible
InfraSec
Lattice Security
Local/regional security firms
Muster
Offensive Security
Packetlabs Ltd
PenTestForge
PenetrationTests.com
Pentest Testing Corp
TrollEye Security
Vention
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.