Digital risk protection
Asked as “digital risk protection platform”, and as “dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · ZeroFox 18%
34SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence18ZeroFox11Flare36others
34% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (34%) replaces UpGuard BreachSight (22% then, 7% now), 27 points clear, past the 11-point floor.SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence leads at 34%, replacing UpGuard BreachSight, which led at 22% and stands at 7% now: 27 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (27%) replaces Guardz (28% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (34%) replaces UpGuard BreachSight (22% then, 7% now), 27 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterprise
ZeroFox37%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (27%) replaces Guardz (28% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (34%) replaces UpGuard BreachSight (22% then, 7% now), 27 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseZeroFox37%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%3%33endorsed leader▲+28Since October 2026: 6% → 34%, +28 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.6% → 34%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%3%33endorsed leader▲+28Since October 2026: 6% → 34%, +28 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.6% → 34%02ZeroFox18%30%60criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 14% → 18%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 18%
ZeroFox18%30%60criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 14% → 18%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 18%03
Flare11%6%16accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%
Flare11%6%16accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%04
UpGuard BreachSight7%21%14accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 22% → 7%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.22% → 7%
UpGuard BreachSight7%21%14accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 22% → 7%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.22% → 7%05
Cyble Vision5%0%15accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Cyble Vision5%0%15accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%06
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection2%33%46criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection2%33%46criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform0%14%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09
Rapid7 Threat Command0%12%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Rapid7 Threat Command0%12%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%11
BrandShield0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
BrandShield0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
Fortra Brand Protection0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Fortra Brand Protection0%9%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08
CloudSEK XVigil0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble VisionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs FlareZeroFox vs UpGuard BreachSightZeroFox vs Cyble VisionZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs UpGuard BreachSightFlare vs Cyble VisionFlare vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSight vs Cyble VisionUpGuard BreachSight vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionCyble Vision vs Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506N07
080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%02ZeroFox18%
ZeroFox18%03Flare11%
Flare11%04UpGuard BreachSight7%
UpGuard BreachSight7%05Cyble Vision5%
Cyble Vision5%06Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection2%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection2%07Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform0%
08CloudSEK XVigil0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%09Rapid7 Threat Command0%
Rapid7 Threat Command0%10Fortra Brand Protection0%
Fortra Brand Protection0%11BrandShield0%
BrandShield0%12Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection0%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection0%13Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ZeroFox30%
18 of 60 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-only DRP tools (like ZeroFox or Recorded Future) unless you have a dedicated security budget of $100,000+ per year.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection33%
15 of 46 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“What to Avoid - Recorded Future and ZeroFox are excellent but are built for enterprise budgets” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection31%
4 of 13 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Group-IB Digital Risk Protection - mentioned as being a "criticized challenger" and having a high negative rate.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Flashpoint43%
3 of 7 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Platforms to evaluate carefully: Recorded Future, Flashpoint, Intel 471, Cyberint.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 892 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Netcraft41 answers · 61 citations · 13 models
32 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 54 citations · 13 models
vendor site · CloudSEK28 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · UpGuard26 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ZeroFox16 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Breachsense15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence socradar.io | 34% | 132 | 20 | 0 | 19,499 | 0 | ||
| ZeroFox zerofox.com | 18% | 168 | 4,400 | 129 | 10,937 | $175 | 32 | 1 |
| Flare flare.io | 11% | 62 | 49,500 | 97,656 | 12,128 | 6 | 2 | |
| UpGuard upguard.com UpGuard BreachSight 7% | 7% | 101 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 company | 25 | ||
| Cyble Vision cyble.com | 5% | 91 | 30 | 1 | 20,856 | 11 | ||
| Bolster bolster.ai Bolster 2%, Bolster AI 2% | 5% | 15 | 60,500 | 4,591 | 42,916 | 7 | ||
| Recorded Future recordedfuture.com Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 2% | 2% | 129 | 6,600 | 260 | 50,278 company | 22 | 8 | |
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 2% | 2% | 659 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Breachsense breachsense.com | 2% | 13 | ||||||
| Brand Protector brandprotector.io | 2% | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudsek.com, g2.com, netcraft.com, zerofox.com). The first result for “best digital risk protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top digital risk protection platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a digital risk protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital risk protection platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble VisionZeroFoxChangedno first choiceCyble Visionno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Cyble Vision, Flare, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceFour alternatives
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightGPT-5.4 miniSOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceRecorded Future Brand Intelligence / Digital Risk ProtectionChangedagainst: Microsoft Defender dark web monitoringZeroFoxZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionOne alternative
CrowdStrike Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence / Digital Risk Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionOne alternative
ConstellaGemini 3.5 FlashFlareagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlareHeldagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Flashpoint, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bolster, Rapid7 Threat Command, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Fortra’s PhishLabs, Rapid7 Threat Command, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Flare, Have I Been Pwned (HIBP) Enterprise Domain Search, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Thinkst Canarytokens, dnstwistPerplexity SonarUpGuard BreachSightUpGuard BreachSightHeldagainst: ZeroFoxZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint DRP, Rapid7 Threat Command, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox
Seven alternatives
BlueVoyant Sky: DRP, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest Digital Shadows, ZeroFoxOne alternative
Cyble VisionEight alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Red Points, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, nebtyGrok 4.20SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: BlueVoyant, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxFlareChangedagainst: CrowdStrike, Have I Been Pwned, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Flare, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Brandefense, CloudSEK XVigil, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rainforest Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox
One alternative
Cyble VisionFour alternatives
Breachsense, Fortra Brand Protection, SpyCloud, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Cyble Vision, Microsoft PurviewMistral SmallZeroFoxBreachsense, FlareChangedagainst: Flashpoint, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: BrandShield, CTM360, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Four alternatives
Cyberint, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Bolster, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformTwo alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SkurioDeepSeek V4 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Digital ShadowsZeroFoxChangedNetcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, ZeroFox
One alternative
ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
BrandShield, FlareNine alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Cyble Vision, Digital Shadows, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Microsoft 365, Microsoft Defender for CloudSeven alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Digital Shadows, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Six alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Flare, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxQwen 3.7 FlashUpGuard BreachSightagainst: ZeroFoxRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxIntelius Businessno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Cyberint, Flashpoint, Intel 471, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox
One alternative
Cyble VisionFour alternatives
CyCryber, SecureLayer7, ThreatConnect, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
Flashpoint, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
BreachScan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, SpyCloudKimi K2CTM360, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceFlare, ZeroFoxChangedagainst: Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, PhishLabs, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
BrandShield, BreachsenseNine alternatives
CYFIRMA, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Cyble Vision, Flare Threat Exposure Management, Open-Source ToolsGLM 4.7 FlashXZeroFoxBolster AIChangedCloudSEK XVigil, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Avast Business, Bitdefender, McAfee, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: "DRP", Aura, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
Three alternatives
Doppel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSightFour alternatives
BrandShield, Cyberint, Flashpoint Ignite, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Command, Red Points, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk ProtectionOne alternative
Microsoft 365MiniMax M2.5SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceProofpoint Threat Intelligence & Brand Protection, ZeroFoxChangedagainst: DarktraceRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Dark Web ID, DomainTools, Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
Acronis Cyber Protect, Avast Premium Business Security, Bitdefender Ultimate Small Business Security, Microsoft 365GPT-6 LunaSOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceBolsterChangedno first choiceStyxno first choiceagainst: ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Bolster, Fortra Brand ProtectionTwo alternatives
Flare, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Brand Protector, FraudpolMuse Glimmer 30BSOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceZeroFoxChangedno first choiceBrand Protectorno first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CyberintTwo alternatives
BrandShield, Cyble VisionFive alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Email Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Cyble Vision, Risk CheckBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 24 | 58 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 23 | 81 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:59 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 14 | 112 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:25 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 19 | 67 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 24 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 13 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:17 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:14 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:07 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:17 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:14 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 25 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:53 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CloudSEK (XVigil) read as CloudSEK XVigil
Cyble read as Cyble Vision
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (formerly Digital Guardian) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (formerly HelpSystems) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra DRP read as Fortra Digital Risk Protection
Group-IB read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Netcraft read as Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (Digital Risk Protection) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (Entry-Level) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (including ThreatConnect) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Rapid7 (Managed DRPS / Threat Command) read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Recorded Future read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future DRP read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (GreyMatter) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (formerly Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (incorporating Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
SOCRadar read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard (Breach Risk) read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard Breach Risk read as UpGuard BreachSight
Unresolved, counted raw
"DRP" (web hosting company)
Agari
BreachScan
CSC
CrowdStrike Counter Adversary Operations
CrowdStrike Digital Risk Protection
CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence / Digital Risk Protection
CyCryber
Cycops (Securonix)
Flare Threat Exposure Management
Fortra’s PhishLabs (or BrandShield)
Fraudpol
GuardYourDomain
Have I Been Pwned (HIBP) Enterprise Domain Search
HaveIBeenPwned
Intelius Business
Mandiant Digital Risk Protection
MarkMonitor
Microsoft Defender dark web monitoring
Open-Source Tools
Privacy Bee
Proofpoint Threat Intelligence & Brand Protection
Rainforest Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future Brand Intelligence / Digital Risk Protection
Resecurity
Risk Check
Searchlight Security
Seqrite
Splunk Inc.
Tenex.AI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.