Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is first at 27%.
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence is first at 34%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ZeroFox is first at 37%.
Why models recommend it
“Netcraft is widely considered the global leader in takedowns, with a median phishing takedown time of just 33 minutes”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Netcraft is the strongest choice for large organizations protecting customers from impersonation and fraud across online channels.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Netcraft instead if customer-facing phishing and rapid takedown are the dominant risks.”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
“Choose Netcraft if fast phishing detection and takedown are the primary requirements.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“strong reputations do not guarantee fit. Validate geography, social-platform coverage, alert quality, and documented takedown times”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“pricing typically starts higher than SOCRadar — better for organizations where brand impersonation is the primary threat”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“A few reviews cite slower alerts in some cases or limitations in non-core areas like dark web depth.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Excellent for fast takedowns or managed services, but narrower scope or more hands-off.”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, over the 81 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73 | 17 | View → | |
| 66 | 16 | View → | |
| 47 | 15 | View → | |
| 27 | 1 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 17 | 5 | View → | |
| 17 | 1 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 3 | View → |
What the models named instead of Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 81 of the 81 answers that named Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
291 of the 346 domain citations in answers naming Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 518 | 74 | 2026-09-29 | CDN | |
| News or press | 16 | 14 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 8 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs zerofox comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs doppel comparison
- 2026-09-29Netcraft vs fortra phishlabs comparison
- 2026-09-29Thanks webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Glossary glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Web server survey blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netcraft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.