Digital risk protection for enterprise buyers
Asked as “digital risk protection platform”, and as “dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 22%
37ZeroFox22Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection06Cyble Vision35others
37% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.ZeroFox held the lead, +8 points on 29%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (27%) replaces Guardz (28% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (34%) replaces UpGuard BreachSight (22% then, 7% now), 27 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
ZeroFox37%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence27%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (27%) replaces Guardz (28% then, 9% now), 18 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence34%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence (34%) replaces UpGuard BreachSight (22% then, 7% now), 27 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseZeroFox37%Contested▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ZeroFox37%21%63endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 37%
ZeroFox37%21%63endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 29% → 37%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 37%02
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection22%13%54accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection22%13%54accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%03
Cyble Vision6%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Cyble Vision6%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%04Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform4%9%32accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
05
UpGuard BreachSight4%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
UpGuard BreachSight4%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection4%35%17criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection4%35%17criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2%10%20accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2%10%20accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%08
Fortra Brand Protection2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Fortra Brand Protection2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Flashpoint0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Flashpoint0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
CloudSEK XVigil0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs ZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs FlareSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs UpGuard BreachSight
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble VisionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs FlareZeroFox vs UpGuard BreachSightZeroFox vs Cyble VisionZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs UpGuard BreachSightFlare vs Cyble VisionFlare vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSight vs Cyble VisionUpGuard BreachSight vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionCyble Vision vs Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203N04
05060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ZeroFox37%
ZeroFox37%02Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection22%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection22%03Cyble Vision6%
Cyble Vision6%04Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform4%
05UpGuard BreachSight4%
UpGuard BreachSight4%06Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection4%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection4%07Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2%08Fortra Brand Protection2%
Fortra Brand Protection2%09CloudSEK XVigil0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%10SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%11Flashpoint0%
Flashpoint0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ZeroFox21%
13 of 63 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“"Platforms with Known Issues ### ZeroFox - Inefficient alerts: Takedowns often take too long or remain incomplete" and gives ZeroFox a high negative share” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection13%
7 of 54 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Quote-Based Models: Platforms like Recorded Future, ZeroFox, and Netcraft ... making costs less predictable.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection35%
6 of 17 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Proofpoint DRP (immature challenger status in this specific category)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence18%
4 of 22 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“highly rated but may have more complex or custom pricing structures, making cost predictability less straightforward” Mistral Small, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 955 links across 228 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G234 answers · 62 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netcraft34 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ZeroFox27 answers · 48 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CloudSEK27 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · UpGuard24 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Recorded Future21 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Breachsense21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Amazon14 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroFox zerofox.com | 37% | 168 | 4,400 | 129 | 10,937 | $175 | 32 | 1 |
| Recorded Future recordedfuture.com Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 22% | 22% | 129 | 6,600 | 260 | 50,278 company | 22 | 8 | |
| Cyble Vision cyble.com | 6% | 91 | 30 | 1 | 20,856 | 11 | ||
| Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform netcraft.com | 4% | 81 | 0 | 6,024 | 12 | 4 | ||
| UpGuard upguard.com UpGuard BreachSight 4% | 4% | 101 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 company | 25 | ||
| Proofpoint parent site Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection 4% | 4% | 43 | 27,100 | 1,488 | ||||
| Secure60.io secure60.io | 4% | 3 | ||||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft 365 E5 2%, Microsoft Defender 2% | 4% | 52 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Group-IB group-ib.com Group-IB Digital Risk Protection 2% | 2% | 42 | 20 | 0 | 44,299 company | 1 | 2 | |
| Fortra fortra.com Fortra Brand Protection 2% | 2% | 32 | 30 | 0 | 125,581 company | $34 | 60 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aws.amazon.com, cloudsek.com, g2.com, netcraft.com, recordedfuture.com, zerofox.com). The first result for “best digital risk protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital risk protection platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade digital risk protection platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a digital risk protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital risk protection platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Digital ShadowsZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionProofpoint Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxGroup-IB Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Commandagainst: Digital Shadows SearchLight, Fortra Brand Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Three alternatives
Bitsight, CrowdStrike, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter DRPSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CrowdStrike, Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Email Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
CrowdStrike FalconGPT-5.4 miniProofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxagainst: CrowdStrikeZeroFoxChangedZeroFoxZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: BlueVoyant DRP, Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
Flashpoint, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionFour alternatives
Brandefense, EBRAND, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionOne alternative
Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionGemini 3.5 FlashRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Flare, Fortra Brand Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Cyberint, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SpyCloudSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CybelAngel, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Flare, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxPerplexity SonarZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSightno first choiceagainst: Bolster, Check Point Exposure Management, Cyberint, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat CommandFour alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, PhishLabs, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionTen alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint DRP, Rapid7 Threat Command, ReliaQuest Digital Shadows, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxOne alternative
ZeroFoxGrok 4.20Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformZeroFoxagainst: Flashpoint, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: CTM360, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Command, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
Bitsight, Cyble Vision, Fortra Brand Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Flashpoint, Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionMistral SmallRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxCyble VisionChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionCrowdStrike Falconagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: CTM360, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Flashpoint, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformTwo alternatives
Bitsight, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxDeepSeek V4 FlashZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldagainst: Dark Web ID, ID AgentRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Proofpoint DRPZeroFoxagainst: Digital Shadows, ZeroFox
Four alternatives
Doppel, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Flare, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CTM360, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CrowdStrike, DigitalStakeout, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Cyble Vision, Flashpoint, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceNetcraft Digital Risk Protection Platformno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxQwen 3.7 FlashZeroFoxCyble VisionChangedRedPoint GlobalSecure60.ioagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Cyble Vision, Kroll, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SpyCloudTwo alternatives
Flare, SpyCloudFive alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Fortra Brand Protection, IntSights, RiskIQ, SOCRADARyThree alternatives
Blumira, CTM360, Microsoft PurviewKimi K2Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxHeldRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxMicrosoft 365 E5, Microsoft Defender, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Cyble Vision, Flare, Fortra Brand Protection, PhishLabs, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: PhishLabs, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence Recon, Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring, SpyCloudFive alternatives
BlueVoyant, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint DRPTwo alternatives
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightGLM 4.7 FlashXRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionBolster AI, ZeroFoxChangedZeroFoxDigitalStakeoutagainst: SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Five alternatives
BrandShield, CloudSEK XVigil, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
Brandefense, Flashpoint, Group‑IB – Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft – Deep & Dark Web Monitoring, Recorded Future – Brand IntelligenceNine alternatives
CTM360, Check Point Exposure Management, CloudSEK XVigil, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Red Points, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightTwo alternatives
UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxMiniMax M2.5Bitsight, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxChangedZeroFoxSecure60.iono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Cyble Vision, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Allure Security, Microsoft PurviewGPT-6 LunaNetcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformFortra Brand ProtectionChangedno first choiceagainst: Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Check Point External Risk Management / Exposure Management, Cyberint, Digital Shadows SearchLight, PhishLabs
Two alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformMuse Glimmer 30BZeroFoxCyble VisionChangedno first choiceUpGuard BreachSightagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Digital Shadows, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, IntSights, PhishLabs, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Five alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceThree alternatives
Bitsight Brand & Executive Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Red PointsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:05 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 22 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 25 | 70 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:29 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 22 | 73 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 22 | 99 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:05 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 22 | 158 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:48 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 19 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:59 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 19 | 78 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 14 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 24 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:29 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 22 | 94 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 25 | 189 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 15 | 115 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 3 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CloudSEK read as CloudSEK XVigil
CloudSEK (XVigil) read as CloudSEK XVigil
Cyble read as Cyble Vision
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs / Agari / Brand Protection) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (formerly Digital Shadows) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra DRP read as Fortra Digital Risk Protection
Group-IB read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Mandiant (Google Cloud) read as Mandiant Advantage
Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) read as Mandiant Advantage
Mandiant (now Google) read as Mandiant Advantage
Netcraft read as Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (Digital Risk) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (Nexgate) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Recorded Future read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (formerly Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
SOCRadar read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard Breach Risk read as UpGuard BreachSight
Unresolved, counted raw
Bitsight Brand & Executive Intelligence
Bitsight Threat Intelligence
BlueVoyant DRP
Check Point Exp
EBRAND
Group‑IB
Group‑IB – Digital Risk Protection (DRP)
Guard Your Domain
Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring (Google Cloud)
Netcraft – Deep & Dark Web Monitoring
Recorded Future – Brand Intelligence
RedPoint Global
SOCRADARy
ScruteX
Terbium Labs
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.