Process mining
Asked as “process mining tool”, and as “process intelligence platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Apromore 27%
29Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining27Apromore10UiPath Process Mining35others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (29%) replaces Apromore (19% then, 27% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads at 29%, replacing Apromore, which led at 19% and stands at 27% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (21%) replaces Microsoft Power Automate (25% then, 16% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (29%) replaces Apromore (19% then, 27% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%Consensus▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform68%Consensus▲+1Since October 2026: 67% → 68%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining29%9%47accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 14% → 29%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.14% → 29%
02
Apromore27%9%46accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 19% → 27%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 27%
Apromore27%9%46accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 19% → 27%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 27%03
UiPath Process Mining10%18%56accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
UiPath Process Mining10%18%56accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%04Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%51%65criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 3% → 6%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 6%
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%51%65criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 3% → 6%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 6%05PM4Py4%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06
Microsoft Power Automate4%20%10accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
Microsoft Power Automate4%20%10accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%07SAP Signavio Process Intelligence2%33%49criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
08
ABBYY Timeline2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
ABBYY Timeline2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11ProM0%50%14criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
10IBM Process Mining0%29%24criticized challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 14% → 0%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.14% → 0%
09QPR ProcessAnalyzer0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineApromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs PM4PyApromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromore vs ABBYY TimelineUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyUiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs ABBYY TimelineCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4PyCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs Microsoft Power AutomateCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platform vs ABBYY TimelinePM4Py vs Microsoft Power AutomatePM4Py vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligencePM4Py vs ABBYY TimelineMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs ABBYY TimelineSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs ABBYY Timeline
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
020304P05
06S07
08Q09
I10
P11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining29%
02Apromore27%
Apromore27%03UiPath Process Mining10%
UiPath Process Mining10%04Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6%05PM4Py4%
06Microsoft Power Automate4%
Microsoft Power Automate4%07SAP Signavio Process Intelligence2%
08ABBYY Timeline2%
ABBYY Timeline2%09QPR ProcessAnalyzer0%
10IBM Process Mining0%
11ProM0%
What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform51%
33 of 65 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
33%
16 of 49 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
UiPath Process Mining18%
10 of 56 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“mid-to-high cost and overkill for limited budgets” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
ProM
50%
7 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“avoid deploying it for production enterprise use” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 799 links across 163 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 43 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G228 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bardeen23 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · KYP.ai15 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ProcessMind14 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Softwaresuggest14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 12 models
25 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 5 models
11 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best process mining tool”, “process mining tool”, “process mining tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining 29%, Microsoft Power Automate 4% | 33% | 323 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Apromore apromore.com Apromore 27%, Apromore Community Edition 4% | 31% | 122 | 590 | 9 | 227 | |||
| UiPath Process Mining uipath.com | 10% | 148 | 140 | 3 | 161,995 | $74 | 107 | 6 |
| Mindzie mindzie.com | 6% | 29 | 30 | 0 | 22 | |||
| Celonis Process Intelligence Platform celonis.com | 6% | 184 | 170 | 0 | 18,510 | 120 | ||
| PM4Py | 4% | 140 | 1 | |||||
| SAP parent site SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 2% | 2% | 153 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| ABBYY Timeline abbyy.com | 2% | 39 | 30 | 0 | 36,786 | 14 | ||
| process.science process-science.com | 2% | 21 | ||||||
| ProcessMind processmind.com | 2% | 23 | 20 | 0 | 750 | 0 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (processmind.com, trycaddi.com). The first result for “best process mining tool” is decisions.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best process mining tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which process intelligence platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top process mining tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best process mining tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a process mining tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which process mining tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzieagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformno first choiceChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreagainst: Discono first choiceagainst: ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Disco, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, ProM, UiPath Process Mining
Four alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process MiningEight alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, ARIS Process Mining, Automation Anywhere, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Minit, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
PM4Py, ProMGPT-5.4 miniApromoreagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformSAP Signavio Process IntelligenceChangedCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Apromore, DiscoApromoreagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Fluxicon Disco, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, process.scienceGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningChangedagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformPM4Pyagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Lana Labs, Microsoft Power Automate, Microsoft Power BI, Minit, ProM, ProcessGold, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Tableau, UiPath Process Mining, myInvenio
Two alternatives
Apromore, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, KYP.ai, UiPath Process MiningFive alternatives
Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Fluxicon Disco, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, ProM FrameworkSeven alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Appian Process Mining, Fluxicon Disco, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS, UiPath Process MiningPerplexity SonarApromoreagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process MiningChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Four alternatives
Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningSix alternatives
Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Apromore, PM4Py, mindzie Desktop EditionGrok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformChangedCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: PM4Py, ProMMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, PM4Py, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Miningno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Fluxicon Disco, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Minit, ProM, UiPath Process Mining
Three alternatives
Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.scienceThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningSeven alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Appian, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Apromore, process.scienceMistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformCelonis Process Intelligence Platform, ProcessMaker Process IntelligenceChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreno first choiceagainst: ABBYY Timeline, ARIS Process Mining, Appian Process HQ, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
One alternative
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningTwo alternatives
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Microsoft, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Fluxicon Disco, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, ProcessMindDeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMindagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process MiningChangedagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromoreagainst: ProM Toolsno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Automation Anywhere Discovery Bot, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Four alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
KYP.ai, Microsoft Power Automate, ProcessMaker PISix alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, process.scienceFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningLlama 4 MaverickMindzieno first choiceChangedno first choiceApromoreno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Two alternatives
Caddi, Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process MiningChangedagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Apromoreagainst: Appian, Bizagi, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, PowerBI, ServiceNow Process Mining, Tableau, UiPath Process Mining
Two alternatives
Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisorTwo alternatives
Apromore, UiPath Process MiningFour alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
MindzieFour alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Signavio, UiPath Process MiningKimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, MindzieChangedagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore Community Editionno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platformagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, ProM, UiPath Process Mining
Two alternatives
QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process MiningSix alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Appian, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, PM4Py, ProMTwo alternatives
Mindzie, ProcessMindGLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.scienceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process MiningChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningno first choiceagainst: ProM
Two alternatives
IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceThree alternatives
IBM Process Mining, ProcessMind, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceEleven alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Apromore Community Edition, BusinessOptix, Disco, MEHRWERK ProcessMining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Minit, ProM, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningFive alternatives
Apromore, Mindzie, PM4Py, ProM, process.scienceMiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process MiningChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformPM4Pyagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, ProMno first choicenothing named
One alternative
IBM Process MiningFive alternatives
Appian Process Mining, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Minit, Signavio, UiPath Process MiningSix alternatives
ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, PM4Py, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Apromore Community Edition, DiscoGPT-6 LunaApromoreMicrosoft Power Automate Process MiningChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Miningno first choiceagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Four alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningTwo alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceSix alternatives
ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process MiningOne alternative
PM4PyMuse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Miningagainst: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceApromoreChangedCelonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore Community Editionno first choiceagainst: ABBYY Timeline, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, IBM Process Mining, Software AG ARIS Process Mining
Three alternatives
Mindzie, Workfellow, process.scienceSix alternatives
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining, WorkfellowFive alternatives
Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, Minit, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Agentic AutomationThree alternatives
Mindzie, PM4Py, ProMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 19 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 13 | 129 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:00 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 22 | 60 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 102 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:28 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 15 | 68 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:16 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 15 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:02 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:17 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:59 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:00 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:45 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:37 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 8 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:25 | yes | 25 | 155 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 5 | 99 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ABBYY read as ABBYY Timeline
ARIS read as ARIS Process Mining
ARIS (Software AG) read as ARIS Process Mining
ARIS (by Software AG) read as ARIS Process Mining
Celonis read as Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
IBM read as IBM Process Mining
Microsoft Process Advisor read as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Microsoft Process Mining read as Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
SAP Signavio read as SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Process Mining
Skan read as Skan AI
UiPath read as UiPath Process Mining
UiPath Process Intelligence read as UiPath Process Mining
Unresolved, counted raw
Automation Anywhere Discovery
Automation Anywhere Discovery Bot
Automation Anywhere Process Discovery
IBM Process Mining as a Service
Kye
Lana Labs
Livejourney
MEHRWERK ProcessMining
MPM ProcessMining
Microsoft Minit
Noreja
ProM Tools
ProcessExplorer
ProcessMaker Process Intelligence (PI)
QPR ProcessAdvisor
SAP Signavoy
Scout Platform
Software AG – ARIS Process Mining
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.