Proposal software for enterprise buyers
Asked as “proposal software”, and as “sales proposal and quote document tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Responsive 13%
22PandaDoc13Responsive11DealHub54others
22% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs DealHubPandaDoc vs LoopioPandaDoc vs BonsaiPandaDoc vs ProposableProposify vs QwilrProposify vs Better ProposalsProposify vs DealHubProposify vs LoopioProposify vs BonsaiProposify vs ProposableQwilr vs Better ProposalsQwilr vs DealHubQwilr vs LoopioQwilr vs BonsaiQwilr vs ProposableBetter Proposals vs DealHubBetter Proposals vs LoopioBetter Proposals vs BonsaiBetter Proposals vs ProposableDealHub vs LoopioDealHub vs BonsaiDealHub vs ProposableLoopio vs BonsaiLoopio vs ProposableBonsai vs Proposable
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01PandaDoc22%
PandaDoc22%02Responsive13%
Responsive13%03DealHub11%
DealHub11%04Conga Composer7%
Conga Composer7%05GetAccept7%
GetAccept7%06Loopio4%
Loopio4%07Upland Qvidian4%
Upland Qvidian4%08Conga CPQ2%
Conga CPQ2%09Proposify2%
Proposify2%10Better Proposals2%
Better Proposals2%11AutogenAI0%
AutogenAI0%12Qwilr0%
Qwilr0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
PandaDoc35%
19 of 55 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid for enterprise bid management, RFP response, government contracting, or formal compliance-heavy procurement.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Proposify42%
15 of 36 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Limited scalability for complex RFPs... SMB/mid-market focus: Lacks deep content auditing features for high-volume, global enterprise compliance” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Qwilr39%
11 of 28 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid general-purpose tools like Proposify, Qwilr, or PandaDoc for federal work requiring SF330 compliance” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Better Proposals60%
9 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Limited enterprise features: Lacks sophisticated analytics, advanced engagement tracking, and extensive security/compliance features” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 317 links across 117 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · GetAccept15 answers · 23 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Responsive13 answers · 22 citations · 4 models
vendor site · SiftHub9 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · AutogenAI8 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Flowcase7 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Inventive6 answers · 10 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Loopio6 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Proposify6 answers · 9 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Guideflow6 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Arphie5 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Lindy5 answers · 5 citations · 3 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
12 answers · 3 models
9 answers · 3 models
9 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 3 models
5 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 3 models
5 answers · 3 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proposal software”, “proposal software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 22% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | 1 |
| Salesforce parent site Salesforce Revenue Cloud 9%, Salesforce CPQ 6%, Salesforce Revenue Management 2% | 17% | 233 | 550,000 | 60,632 | ||||
| Responsive responsive.io | 13% | 232 | 12,100 | 210,141 | 37,620 | 16 | ||
| DealHub dealhub.io | 11% | 172 | 1,900 | 83 | 319,299 | $372 | 62 | |
| Conga conga.com Conga Composer 7%, Conga CPQ 2% | 9% | 133 | 27,100 | 2,882 | 46,363 company | $224 | 120 | |
| GetAccept getaccept.com | 7% | 235 | 590 | 9 | 15,454 | $4,087 | 14 | 6 |
| Loopio loopio.com | 4% | 250 | 3,600 | 80 | 4,640 | 26 | ||
| Upland Qvidian uplandsoftware.com | 4% | 106 | 40 | 1 | 67,149 | $1,203 | 26 | 5 |
| Bidara bidara.ai | 4% | 1 | ||||||
| Inventive AI inventive.ai | 2% | 48 | 260 | 558 | 9,514 | $694 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (getaccept.com, proposify.com, sifthub.io). The first result for “best proposal software” is grantbite.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best proposal software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales proposal and quote document tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade proposal tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proposal software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a proposal software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proposal tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub, PandaDocConga Composer, Salesforce CPQChangedAutogenAIConga Composerno first choiceagainst: Bonsai, Conga Composer, PandaDoc, Proposable, Proposify
Four alternatives
ClientPoint, Conga Composer, Oneflow, SiftHubOne alternative
DealHubFive alternatives
DealHub, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, ResponsiveOne alternative
ResponsiveGPT-5.4 miniLoopio, ResponsiveSalesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue ManagementChangedagainst: PandaDocResponsiveagainst: AutoRFP.ai, AutogenAI, InventiveResponsiveno first choiceagainst: PandaDoc
Four alternatives
GetAccept, Oracle CPQ, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Loopio, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
Presel, ProposalWorkspaceGemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedLoopio, ResponsiveAutoRFP.ai, Inventive AIagainst: Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, ResponsiveResponsiveagainst: AutoRFP.ai, SiftHub, SparrowGenieagainst: Better Proposals, Bidsketch, Bonsai, Cone, DocuSign Gen, GetAccept, HoneyBook, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposify, Prospero, Qwilr
Six alternatives
Conga Composer, DocuSign Gen, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, PandaDocFive alternatives
AutogenAI, GetAccept, PandaDoc, Proposify, Upland QvidianThree alternatives
Quoter, SubcontractorHub, Tribble AITwo alternatives
Loopio, Upland QvidianPerplexity SonarGetAcceptSalesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedno first choiceBetter Proposalsagainst: PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Bonsai, Nusii, Proposable, Proposify, Prospero, Qwilr
Three alternatives
AutogenAI, PandaDoc, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, PandaDocOne alternative
GetAcceptGrok 4.20Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: PandaDoc, ProposifySalesforce Revenue CloudHeldagainst: DealHub, PandaDoc, ProposifyLoopio, Responsiveagainst: PandaDoc, ProposifyGetAccept, PandaDocagainst: Conga Composer, DealHub, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: Adobe Acrobat Sign, Better Proposals, Bonsai, DocuSign, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, Upland QvidianOne alternative
Salesforce Revenue CloudMistral SmallGetAccept, PandaDocDealHubChangedLoopioBidaraPandaDocagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHubFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, GetAccept, PandaDoc, ProposifyFour alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, GetAccept, PandaDocThree alternatives
PandaDoc, Qwilr, VercorFour alternatives
GetAccept, Loopio, ProposalSpace, QwilrDeepSeek V4 FlashResponsiveagainst: PandaDoc, QwilrConga ComposerChangedagainst: PandaDoc, ProposifyLoopio, ResponsivePandaDocagainst: Better Proposals, GetAccept, Qwilr, ResponsivePandaDocagainst: Qwilragainst: Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Three alternatives
Loopio, QorusDocs, Upland QvidianFour alternatives
DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudFour alternatives
AutogenAI, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrOne alternative
LoopioOne alternative
ProposifyLlama 4 MaverickProposifyno first choiceChangedno first choiceOneflowno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
GetAccept, QwilrQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDoc, ResponsiveDealHubChangedLoopio, ResponsiveGetAccept, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Canva, Conga Composer, DealHub, PandaDoc, Prospero, Qwilr, Venngage
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, ProposifyThree alternatives
Conga Composer, PandaDoc, QwilrFive alternatives
Conga Composer, Expedience, GetAccept, GovDash / GovWin, PandaDocTwo alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHubKimi K2Responsive, Upland QvidianConga Composer, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedagainst: PandaDocLoopio, ResponsiveConga CPQ, DealHubagainst: Better Proposals, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilrno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Bidsketch, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Four alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, PandaDoc, SiftHubTwo alternatives
Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQSeven alternatives
AutogenAI, Conga CPQ, DealHub, PandaDoc, Proposify, QorusDocs, QwilrTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ResponsiveGLM 4.7 FlashXPandaDocDealHubChangedGetAcceptPandaDocLoopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidianagainst: Microsoft Word online, PandaDoc
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Conga Composer, GetAccept, PandaDoc, QwilrSix alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, StorydocThree alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Proposify, QwilrMiniMax M2.5PandaDocDealHubChangedno first choiceBidaraagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidianno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Proposify, QorusDocs
Two alternatives
GetAccept, Salesforce CPQThree alternatives
Conga Composer, PandaDoc, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Inventive AI, PropCraft, VercorBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 04:21 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:01 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:08 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-14 23:19 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:55 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 02:28 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:13 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:35 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:14 | yes | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:28 | yes | 0 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:20 | yes | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:46 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:47 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:45 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:25 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-14 23:54 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:47 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:51 | yes | 0 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:40 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 05:01 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:18 | yes | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:37 | yes | 0 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:12 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 05:06 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:36 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:42 | yes | 30 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:23 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:08 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:03 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 01:18 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:58 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:18 | yes | 0 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:12 | yes | 0 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 02:16 | yes | 0 | 21 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 04:29 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:52 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:58 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:55 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:25 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:26 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:46 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:05 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 05:02 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:20 | yes | 0 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:23 | yes | 0 | 90 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:51 | yes | 0 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 05:04 | yes | 0 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 05:00 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:42 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:29 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:03 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:42 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:06 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 02:56 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:50 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:56 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:58 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 02:52 | yes | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:27 | yes | 0 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:36 | yes | 22 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:56 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:27 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:42 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:24 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:04 | yes | 0 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:23 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:09 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:58 | yes | 0 | 66 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:48 | yes | 0 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 04:38 | yes | 0 | 42 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AutoRFP read as AutoRFP.ai
Conga read as Conga Composer
Conga (Composer) read as Conga Composer
Conga (Conga Composer / Conga CPQ) read as Conga Composer
Conga (Genesys) read as Conga Composer
Oracle read as Oracle CPQ
Unresolved, counted raw
GovWin
Microsoft Word online
Procore
PropCraft
ProposalSpace
ProposalWorkspace
SubcontractorHub
Tackl
TendOS
Tribble AI
Venngage
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.