CPQ for enterprise buyers
Asked as “CPQ software”, and as “configure, price, quote tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
61%
Clear leader
61Salesforce Revenue Cloud18Oracle CPQ06DealHub14others
61% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
One product takes 61% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud18%
13 of 72 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“Clunky UX leading to low sales adoption; performance degradation with high-volume or multi-dimensional quotes... Avoid/Be Cautious If: Not fully Salesforce-native” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Oracle CPQ15%
9 of 60 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“enterprise buyers are advised to avoid monolithic architectures if they need a diverse stack and composable integrations” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
SAP CPQ
15%
7 of 48 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Complex setup/integration outside SAP ecosystem; unintuitive UI for subscriptions/amendments; resource-intensive” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
DealHub9%
4 of 46 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“may cost less to deploy, but it is usually not the safest answer for thousands of users with complex enterprise requirements” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 307 links across 124 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 14 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Monday.com11 answers · 15 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Cincom9 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · DealHub8 answers · 9 citations · 4 models
8 answers · 9 citations · 3 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Qobra8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Salesbricks8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Gartner7 answers · 14 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Conga6 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Salesforce5 answers · 7 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Alguna5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
13 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 4 models
7 answers · 2 models
7 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cpq software”, “cpq software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce parent site Salesforce Revenue Cloud 61% | 61% | 233 | 550,000 | 60,632 | ||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle CPQ 18% | 18% | 144 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| DealHub dealhub.io | 6% | 172 | 1,900 | 83 | 319,299 | $372 | 62 | 1 |
| SAP CPQ | 6% | 135,000 | 74,309 | |||||
| Conga CPQ conga.com | 4% | 133 | 320 | 19 | 46,363 | $224 | 120 | |
| PROS Smart CPQ pros.com | 4% | 24 | 40 | 0 | 17,307 | 1 | ||
| Tacton tacton.com | 0% | 35 | 480 | 25 | 1,142 | 7 | ||
| Cincom CPQ cincom.com | 0% | 5 | 9 | |||||
| Logik.io | 0% | |||||||
| Zuora CPQ zuora.com | 0% | 5 | 90 | 16 | 24,950 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cincom.com, dealhub.io, gartner.com, mobileforce.ai, monday.com, salesbricks.com, salesforce.com). The first result for “best cpq software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CPQ software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which configure, price, quote tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade CPQ tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CPQ software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a CPQ software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CPQ tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Oracle CPQno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Vendavo
One alternative
SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, ServiceNowOne alternative
DealHubGPT-5.4 miniSalesforce Revenue CloudOracle CPQ, SAP CPQChangedno first choiceOracle CPQagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQOne alternative
Salesforce Revenue CloudSix alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudOne alternative
Conga CPQGemini 3.5 FlashDealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedno first choiceConga CPQagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, SAP or Oracle ERP quoting tools, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonSeven alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Infor CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonThree alternatives
DealHub, Elfsquad CPQ, ExperlogixFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQPerplexity SonarSalesforce Revenue CloudPROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedSalesforce Revenue CloudSAP CPQagainst: DealHubno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQSix alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudGrok 4.20Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: DealHubSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Apparound, Conga CPQ, Epicor CPQ, FPX, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Yagna iQ
Two alternatives
Conga CPQ, SAP CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQMistral SmallSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudHeldSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, ServiceNow CPQ
Five alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQSix alternatives
Cincom CPQ, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQThree alternatives
DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQDeepSeek V4 FlashSalesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudHeldno first choicePROS Smart CPQagainst: Oracle CPQno first choiceagainst: Cosential, DealHub, Epicor CPQ, Model N, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Quotient, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Five alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonSeven alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedno first choiceOracle CPQno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
DealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudQwen 3.7 FlashSalesforce Revenue CloudOracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedagainst: Zoho Creatorno first choiceConga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Konfig, Microsoft Dynamics 365 CPQ, Oracle CPQ, ZingierOne alternative
DealHubOne alternative
Oracle CPQKimi K2Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudHeldSalesforce Revenue CloudSAP CPQagainst: DealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: PROS Smart CPQ, Vendavoagainst: Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQEight alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Infor, Model N, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonOne alternative
Oracle CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQGLM 4.7 FlashXSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDocSalesforce Revenue CloudHeldno first choiceOracle CPQno first choiceagainst: Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Six alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, TactonFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, ServiceNow CPQ with Logik.ioThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudMiniMax M2.5Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Monday.com CPQOracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedno first choiceSalesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
Guideflow, TurnstileOne alternative
Conga CPQSeven alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonTwo alternatives
DealHub, PROS Smart CPQBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:32 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:49 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:57 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:20 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:13 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 23:52 | yes | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:29 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:10 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:38 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:30 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 22:56 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:20 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:27 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:55 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:58 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:13 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 04:53 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 03:20 | yes | 0 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:16 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:39 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:39 | yes | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:05 | yes | 0 | 164 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:15 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:26 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:45 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 01:25 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:04 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:57 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:39 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 00:06 | yes | 0 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:41 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:48 | yes | 0 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:04 | yes | 0 | 54 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 05:01 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:33 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:56 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 02:14 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:30 | yes | 26 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:59 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:48 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:09 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:13 | yes | 0 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:52 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:08 | yes | 0 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:20 | yes | 0 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:15 | yes | 0 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:34 | yes | 0 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:46 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-14 23:49 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:24 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:47 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-14 23:13 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:38 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:56 | yes | 0 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:27 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:36 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:04 | yes | 0 | 74 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:37 | yes | 0 | 84 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:43 | yes | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 04:13 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:55 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 02:01 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:59 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 05:07 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:35 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-14 23:33 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:15 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:14 | yes | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:43 | yes | 0 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:44 | yes | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:41 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BetterCommerce read as BetterCommerce CPQ
Cincom read as Cincom CPQ
Conga read as Conga CPQ
Conga (formerly Apttus) read as Conga CPQ
Conga Smart CPQ read as Conga CPQ
Epicor read as Epicor CPQ
Legacy Salesforce CPQ (Managed Package) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Legacy Salesforce CPQ (The Steelbrick Managed Package) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle CPQ
PROS read as PROS Smart CPQ
Salesforce read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Legacy Version) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Legacy) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Legacy, aka "SteelBrick CPQ") read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Legacy/SteelBrick) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (now part of Salesforce Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ / Revenue Cloud read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Zuora read as Zuora CPQ
Unresolved, counted raw
Apparound
Cogniative
Configure One
Cosential
DeelHub
Elfsquad CPQ
FP10
FPX
Konfig
Microsoft Dynamics 365 CPQ
SAP or Oracle ERP quoting tools
ServiceNow CPQ with Logik.io
Yagna iQ
Zingier
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.