Proposal software for small business buyers
Asked as “proposal software”, and as “sales proposal and quote document tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49PandaDoc13Better Proposals09Proposify30others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs DealHubPandaDoc vs LoopioPandaDoc vs BonsaiPandaDoc vs ProposableProposify vs QwilrProposify vs Better ProposalsProposify vs DealHubProposify vs LoopioProposify vs BonsaiProposify vs ProposableQwilr vs Better ProposalsQwilr vs DealHubQwilr vs LoopioQwilr vs BonsaiQwilr vs ProposableBetter Proposals vs DealHubBetter Proposals vs LoopioBetter Proposals vs BonsaiBetter Proposals vs ProposableDealHub vs LoopioDealHub vs BonsaiDealHub vs ProposableLoopio vs BonsaiLoopio vs ProposableBonsai vs Proposable
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07P08
09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01PandaDoc49%
PandaDoc49%02Better Proposals13%
Better Proposals13%03Proposify9%
Proposify9%04Bonsai4%
Bonsai4%05Agiled4%
Agiled4%06Prospero4%
Prospero4%07Qwilr2%
Qwilr2%08Proposable0%
09GetAccept0%
GetAccept0%10Loopio0%
Loopio0%What they warned about
Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proposify12%
7 of 57 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“criticized for restrictive send limits ... bugs ... Users note it's pricier than alternatives and buggy for non-enterprise use.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
PandaDoc12%
7 of 60 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“strong, but its pricing page points small businesses toward custom/per-seat or per-document pricing rather than a clearly low fixed entry price” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
Loopio55%
6 of 11 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms Requiring Sales Calls Before Pricing... Why avoid: These enterprise-focused platforms typically require sales conversations before showing pricing” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Responsive71%
5 of 7 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Responsive in particular is designed for multiple approval stages and role-based workflows. For a five-person team, configuring that overhead eats up more time than it saves.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
21 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 273 links across 87 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · Flowcase12 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · GetAccept12 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · PandaDoc11 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Proposify11 answers · 13 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Qwilr10 answers · 14 citations · 3 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 4 models
vendor site · SiftHub7 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Better Proposals6 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
vendor site · YouTube6 answers · 7 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Lindy6 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
6 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Agiled5 answers · 7 citations · 1 model
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
12 answers · 3 models
11 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 1 model
5 answers · 1 model
5 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 3 models
5 answers · 3 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proposal software”, “proposal software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 49% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | 1 |
| Better Proposals betterproposals.io | 13% | 124 | 1,300 | 65 | 24,251 | 5 | 4 | |
| Proposify proposify.com | 9% | 259 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | 2 | |
| Bonsai hellobonsai.com | 4% | 38 | 74,000 | 27,918 | ||||
| Agiled agiled.app | 4% | 2 | 49,500 | 30,683 | 6,691 | |||
| Prospero goprospero.com | 4% | 15 | 2,400 | 1,178 | 908 | 2 | ||
| Proposally.ai proposal.biz | 4% | 0 | 99 | |||||
| Qwilr qwilr.com | 2% | 196 | 4,400 | 23 | 10,837 | 27 | ||
| Jotform jotform.com | 2% | 72 | 246,000 | 1,308 | 1,677,836 | $1,619 | 100 | |
| Oneflow oneflow.com | 2% | 32 | 1,000 | 11 | 39,547 | 13 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (betterproposals.io, getaccept.com, pandadoc.com, proposify.com, sifthub.io). The first result for “best proposal software” is grantbite.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best proposal software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales proposal and quote document tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top proposal tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proposal software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a proposal software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proposal tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceQuoteWerksChangedBetter ProposalsCone, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, DealHub, Proposify
Four alternatives
Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
GetAccept, HubSpot CRM, OsmosFive alternatives
PandaDoc, Proposable, Proposify, Prospero, QwilrTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, NusiiGPT-5.4 miniPandaDocPandaDocHeldProposifyProposifyagainst: PandaDocno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, ProposifyTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, PandaDoc, QwilrTwo alternatives
Proposal Kit, QwilrGemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocProsperoPandaDocagainst: Adobe InDesign, Canva, Conga Composer, DealHub, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, RFP360, Responsive, Salesforce CPQ, Standard Microsoft Word, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QuoteWerks, QwilrFour alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, Prospero, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, PandaDoc, ProposableSix alternatives
AutogenAI, Better Proposals, GetAccept, Loopio, Qwilr, SiftHubPerplexity SonarPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocBetter Proposalsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, ProposifyThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrFive alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, Bonsai, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Agiled, ProsperoGrok 4.20PandaDocPandaDocHeldBetter Proposals, PandaDocagainst: Loopio, ResponsiveBetter Proposalsno first choiceagainst: Bidsketch, Loopio, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposable, ProposifyOne alternative
ProposifyFour alternatives
Bonsai, Proposable, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Jotform, Oneflow, PandaDocMistral SmallPandaDocPandaDocHeldBetter ProposalsBonsai, Jotform, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: BasicDocs, GetAccept, Google Workspace, Loopio, PandaDoc, PowerPoint, Proposify, QuoteWerks, RFP360, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Proposify, QuotientFour alternatives
Ignition, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, ProposifyDeepSeek V4 FlashBetter ProposalsPandaDocChangedPandaDocPandaDocagainst: Better Proposals, Nusii, Proposify, QwilrPandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilragainst: Conga Composer, DealHub, Oneflowagainst: ChatGPT, Loopio, QorusDocs, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Two alternatives
PandaDoc, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrSeven alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, Bonsai, HoneyBook, Proposify, Prospero, QwilrFour alternatives
Agiled, Bonsai, Jotform, ProsperoThree alternatives
Loopio, QorusDocs, ResponsiveLlama 4 MaverickAgiled, Better Proposals, PandaDoc, ProposifyProposifyChangedProposifyProsperono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bidsketch, GetAccept, PandaDoc, QuoteCloudFour alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, PandaDoc, StorydocFour alternatives
Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Plutio, ProposifyQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocProposaly.aino first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, GetAccept, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposify, Prospero
Three alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Proposify, QuotientFive alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, Bonsai, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Google Docs + Free Templates, JotformKimi K2Better ProposalsPandaDocChangedPandaDocBonsaino first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Conga Composer, DealHub, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive
Four alternatives
PandaDoc, Proposally.ai, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Dubsado, HoneyBookFive alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, Proposify, Prospero, QwilrFour alternatives
AgencyPitch, Better Proposals, Canva, ProsperoGLM 4.7 FlashXAgiledPandaDocChangedPandaDocOneflow, Proposally.aino first choiceagainst: Microsoft Word, Salesforce-Based Proposal Tools
Six alternatives
Better Proposals, GetAccept, HoneyBook, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Agiled, Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Better Proposals, Bonsai, PandaDoc, ProposableMiniMax M2.5Better Proposals, PandaDocPandaDocChangedPandaDocProposally.aiagainst: PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Salesforce
One alternative
ProposifyTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, ProposifyTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrOne alternative
ProposableFour alternatives
Agiled, DealHub, PandaDoc, ProposifyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:48 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:39 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:47 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:53 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:16 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:33 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-14 23:52 | yes | 0 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:37 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:08 | yes | 0 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:46 | yes | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:38 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:39 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 23:41 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:38 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 04:21 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:20 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:29 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 02:40 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 02:26 | yes | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:08 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:51 | yes | 0 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 05:07 | yes | 0 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:02 | yes | 0 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:19 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:38 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 03:15 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:47 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:54 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-14 23:20 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:22 | yes | 0 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 03:13 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:27 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:30 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:50 | yes | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:32 | yes | 0 | 106 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:44 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:44 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 02:26 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:02 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:29 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:37 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 23:05 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 03:53 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 22:54 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:30 | yes | 0 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:06 | yes | 0 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:20 | yes | 0 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 03:31 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:42 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:38 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:53 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:18 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 04:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 03:47 | yes | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:00 | yes | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 02:24 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:07 | no | 0 | 84 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 05:02 | yes | 0 | 105 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:46 | yes | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:57 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:07 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 22:54 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:17 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:13 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:39 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 02:41 | yes | 0 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:43 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:50 | yes | 0 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:50 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:33 | yes | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:58 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga Composer
HubSpot read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe InDesign
BasicDocs
Google Docs + Free Templates
Proposal Kit
Proposaly.ai
Proprosable
Quillbot AI
Salesforce
Salesforce-Based Proposal Tools
Standard Microsoft Word
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.