Contract lifecycle management and e-signature for small business buyers
Asked as “contract lifecycle management platform”, and as “e-signature and contract management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47PandaDoc18ContractSafe10Zoho Contracts25others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs SpotDraftPandaDoc vs LinkSquaresPandaDoc vs GetAcceptPandaDoc vs ContractWorksJuro vs IroncladJuro vs ConcordJuro vs SpotDraftJuro vs LinkSquaresJuro vs GetAcceptJuro vs ContractWorksIronclad vs ConcordIronclad vs SpotDraftIronclad vs LinkSquaresIronclad vs GetAcceptIronclad vs ContractWorksConcord vs SpotDraftConcord vs LinkSquaresConcord vs GetAcceptConcord vs ContractWorksSpotDraft vs LinkSquaresSpotDraft vs GetAcceptSpotDraft vs ContractWorksLinkSquares vs GetAcceptLinkSquares vs ContractWorksGetAccept vs ContractWorks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06D07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01PandaDoc47%
PandaDoc47%02ContractSafe18%
ContractSafe18%03Zoho Contracts10%
Zoho Contracts10%04Concord8%
Concord8%05GetAccept4%
GetAccept4%06Juro2%
Juro2%07Dropbox Sign2%
08DocuSign2%
DocuSign2%09SpotDraft2%
SpotDraft2%10Contractbook0%
Contractbook0%11ContractWorks0%
ContractWorks0%12Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%
Agiloft Contract Management Suite0%13Icertis Contract Intelligence0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%14DocuSign CLM0%
DocuSign CLM0%15Ironclad0%
Ironclad0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
DocuSign CLM71%
22 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“G2 cons include "too expensive for small teams" (28 reviews), steep learning curve (23 reviews), complex setup.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Ironclad91%
29 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“Systems to AVOID (For Now) ... Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Agiloft, Icertis: These are powerful tools, but they are designed for large, in-house legal departments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Icertis Contract Intelligence88%
14 of 16 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“Icertis: Enterprise-focused for regulated giants; $150K–$700K/year; 6–12 month implementations. Explicitly called "overkill for small businesses"” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Agiloft Contract Management Suite71%
12 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Enterprise-first CLM platforms like Icertis, Ironclad, Agiloft, and sometimes DocuSign CLM can be overkill for small teams” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
22 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 322 links across 120 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · WorksBuddy13 answers · 13 citations · 3 models
12 answers · 20 citations · 4 models
vendor site · GetAccept11 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · ContractSafe9 answers · 21 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 10 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Sirion9 answers · 9 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Conga8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Juro8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · PandaDoc7 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Summize7 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Aline6 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
vendor site · HyperStart6 answers · 7 citations · 2 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
11 answers · 3 models
10 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
7 answers · 3 models
6 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best contract lifecycle management platform”, “contract lifecycle management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 47% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 |
| ContractSafe contractsafe.com | 18% | 59 | 1,000 | 7 | 38,687 | $687 | 120 |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Contracts 10% | 10% | 27 | 390 | 8 | |||
| Concord concord.app | 8% | 89 | 246,000 | 58,369 | 18,445 | ||
| GetAccept getaccept.com | 4% | 235 | 590 | 9 | 15,454 | $4,087 | 14 |
| Juro juro.com | 2% | 63 | 2,900 | 536 | 44,442 | $168 | 120 |
| Dropbox Sign | 2% | 40,500 | 193 | ||||
| Bind bindlegal.com | 2% | 19 | 33,100 | 99,561 | |||
| ContractZen contra.agency | 2% | 3 | 50 | 0 | |||
| DocuSign docusign.com DocuSign 2%, DocuSign eSignature 0% | 2% | 64 | 1,000,000 | 9,641 | 2,280,470 | $20 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aline.co, g2.com). The first result for “best contract lifecycle management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which e-signature and contract management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top contract lifecycle management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a contract lifecycle management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contract lifecycle management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Oneflowagainst: DocuSign CLMPandaDocChangedConcord, PandaDocagainst: IroncladConcordno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad
Three alternatives
Aline, DealHub, JuroTwo alternatives
Dropbox Sign, ProposifyOne alternative
DocuSign CLMThree alternatives
ContractSafe, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsGPT-5.4 miniJuro, SpotDraftagainst: CLM 365, Workday CLMPandaDocChangedContractSafeagainst: IroncladContractSafeagainst: DocuSign CLM, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Juro, Lexion, Sirion CLM
Two alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLMTwo alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Dropbox SignThree alternatives
Concord, Contractbook, PandaDocOne alternative
CLM 365Gemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladPandaDocHeldagainst: DocuSignJuroagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladZoho Contractsagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, IroncladContractSafeagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Microsoft Excel, SirionLabs
Three alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, JuroThree alternatives
Dropbox Sign, Juro, OneflowFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractZen, PandaDocFour alternatives
Concord, Contract Flash, ContractSafe, PandaDocFive alternatives
Concord, ContractWorks, Contractbook, Juro, PandaDocPerplexity SonarPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocZoho Contractsagainst: ContractSafe, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, Contractbook, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Leah, LinkSquares, Oneflow, PandaDoc, SAP Ariba Contracts, SpotDraft
Four alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Contractbook, DocuSign CLMTwo alternatives
Dropbox Sign, signNowFive alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, Contractbook, Zoho ContractsOne alternative
ConcordGrok 4.20ContractSafe, PandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, IroncladPandaDocChangedContractSafe, PandaDocagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladPandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractSafe, DocuSign CLM, IroncladContractSafe, PandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, LinkSquares, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion CLM
Two alternatives
Concord, Zoho ContractsFour alternatives
ContractSafe, DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, GetAcceptThree alternatives
Concord, ContractWorks, Zoho ContractsThree alternatives
Concord, Jotform Sign, SigneasyTwo alternatives
DocuSign CLM, JuroMistral SmallContractSafePandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSignContractSafe, PandaDocZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, CobbleStone Software, Conga CLM, Coupa Contracts, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion, Workday CLM
Three alternatives
Contractbook, GetAccept, PandaDocThree alternatives
Dropbox Sign, GetAccept, signNowFive alternatives
ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM, GetAccept, Juro, Zoho ContractsThree alternatives
ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocSix alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, PandaDocDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, IroncladPandaDocHeldagainst: DocuSignPandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, IroncladContractZen, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: DocuSign, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, CobbleStone Contract Insight, Conga CLM, Contractbook, DocuSign CLM, Gatekeeper, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, PandaDoc, Sirion
Four alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Contractbook, JuroTwo alternatives
Dropbox Sign, GetAcceptSix alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, Contractbook, Juro, SpotDraftOne alternative
ConcordLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDocuSignChangedContractbookContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BindLegal, PipedriveThree alternatives
ContractSafe, DocuSign CLM, PandaDocThree alternatives
Bind, Concord, ContractWorksQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLMPandaDocHeldPandaDocagainst: IroncladZoho Contractsagainst: ContractZenno first choiceagainst: SAP, Salesforce Contract Lifecycle Managementagainst: Ironclad, LawVu, Lexion, Oracle Procurement Cloud, SAP Ariba Contracts, ServiceNow, SpotDraft
Two alternatives
ContractSafe, JuroThree alternatives
DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, HubSpot QuotingFour alternatives
Contractbook, Juro, Oneflow, Zoho ContractsOne alternative
PandaDocKimi K2ContractSafe, PandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladPandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSign, Ironclad, SpotDraftConcordagainst: DocuSign CLM, IroncladConcordagainst: DocuSign CLM, HelloSign, Ironclad, LinkSquares, PandaDocBind, Concord, ContractSafe, PandaDocagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Ironcladagainst: CobbleStone Software, Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, LinkSquares, Sirion
One alternative
SpotDraftFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Dropbox Sign, signNowSix alternatives
ContractSafe, ContractWorks, Contractbook, Juro, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsFour alternatives
Bind, ContractSafe, ContractZen, Zoho ContractsGLM 4.7 FlashXContractSafe, PandaDocDropbox SignChangedContractSafeConcord, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, LinkSquares, Malbek, SAP Ariba Contracts, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Sirion CLM, SpotDraft, Summize
Three alternatives
Concord, GetAccept, Zoho ContractsTwo alternatives
DocuSign, PandaDocFive alternatives
Concord, ContractZen, Contractbook, GetAccept, PandaDocTwo alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Zoho ContractsMiniMax M2.5GetAccept, PandaDocPandaDocChangedContractSafeagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Workday CLMZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Sirion
One alternative
ContractSafeThree alternatives
DocuSign, HelloSign, SigneasyFive alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, ContractWorks, GetAccept, Juro, PandaDocThree alternatives
ContractSafe, ContractZen, PandaDocBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 04:03 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:37 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:09 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:35 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:33 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:44 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 04:07 | yes | 0 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:01 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:54 | yes | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:53 | yes | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 02:43 | yes | 0 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 03:40 | yes | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 04:20 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:15 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:14 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:56 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 02:17 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:55 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 00:52 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:26 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:09 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:31 | yes | 0 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 00:35 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:58 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 04:36 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 01:16 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 03:25 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:42 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:38 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 02:38 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:54 | yes | 0 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:46 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:00 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:33 | yes | 0 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:23 | yes | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:26 | yes | 0 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:41 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:47 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:07 | yes | 27 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:15 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:13 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:01 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 23:50 | yes | 0 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:42 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:54 | yes | 0 | 73 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:42 | yes | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:27 | yes | 0 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:24 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 22:52 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:26 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 04:02 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 02:12 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:48 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-14 22:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 00:04 | yes | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 04:22 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 03:14 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 00:23 | yes | 0 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:14 | yes | 0 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:52 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 00:56 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-14 23:43 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 01:32 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:04 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:45 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 04:58 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 01:44 | yes | 0 | 68 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:31 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 00:35 | yes | 0 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 02:45 | yes | 0 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 04:15 | yes | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 04:48 | yes | 0 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Agiloft read as Agiloft Contract Management Suite
Conga (Apttus) read as Conga CLM
Conga (formerly Apttus) read as Conga CLM
Coupa read as Coupa CLM
Icertis read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
Icertis (Icertis Contract Intelligence) read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
SAP Ariba read as SAP Ariba Contracts
Unresolved, counted raw
Coupa Contracts
Eversign
Google Docs + Sheets
Onit
Oracle Procurement Cloud
SAP
Salesforce Contract Lifecycle Management
Xodo Sign
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.