Index › IT › Identity and access › NHI management › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Non-human identity management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “non-human identity management platform”, and as “machine identity and service account security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Oasis Security 12%
20CyberArk Identity Security Platform12Oasis Security10SailPoint Machine Identity Security57others

20% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 20% → 20%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.CyberArk Identity Security Platform held the lead, ±0 points on 20%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01CyberArk Identity Security Platform20%17%53accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 20% → 20%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 20%
02Oasis Security12%10%29accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%
03SailPoint Machine Identity Security10%25%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
04Akeyless Identity Security Platform8%8%38accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%
05Saviynt Identity Cloud8%19%31accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
06JumpCloud8%0%11accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
07Microsoft Entra ID6%30%23criticized challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
08Venafi4%14%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
09Microsoft4%10%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
10Astrix Security2%13%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
11Token Security2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
12HashiCorp Vault2%32%37criticized challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
18Okta0%32%28criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
14Entro Security0%12%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
19Teleport0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16One Identity0%7%15accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
15GitGuardian NHI Governance0%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Aembit0%0%22accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
17ServiceNow NHIM0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
A04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
S17
18
19
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01CyberArk Identity Security Platform20%
02Oasis Security12%
03SailPoint Machine Identity Security10%
04Akeyless Identity Security Platform8%
05Saviynt Identity Cloud8%
06JumpCloud8%
07Microsoft Entra ID6%
08Venafi4%
09Microsoft4%
10Astrix Security2%
11Token Security2%
12HashiCorp Vault2%
13Aembit0%
14Entro Security0%
15GitGuardian NHI Governance0%
16One Identity0%
17ServiceNow NHIM0%
18Okta0%
19Teleport0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HashiCorp Vault
32%
12 of 37 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“HashiCorp Vault and SailPoint have been noted for limitations in NHI support, scalability, and ease of deployment, making them risky choices” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Okta
32%
9 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid using these as your *only* NHI management solution. Use them only for authentication, not for governance or lifecycle management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
CyberArk Identity Security Platform
17%
9 of 53 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid relying on CyberArk if your primary constraint is cost predictability” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Entra ID
30%
7 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Only Authenticate: (e.g., Okta, Entra ID) — Do not govern actions.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1034 links across 275 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 73 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

36 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · One Identity28 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Akeyless18 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · IBM14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Saviynt13 answers · 24 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 19 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best non-human identity management platform”, “non-human identity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
CyberArk cyberark.com
CyberArk Identity Security Platform 20%
20%11822,2001,253147,793 company$620
Oasis Security oasis.security12%802,400534,117113
SailPoint sailpoint.com
SailPoint Machine Identity Security 10%
10%6122,2001,04958,881 company46
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Entra ID 6%, Microsoft Entra Workload ID 2%, Microsoft Entra ID Governance 2%
10%4992,240,000403,136
Akeyless Identity Security Platform akeyless.io8%1263,357$916245
Saviynt saviynt.com
Saviynt Identity Cloud 8%
8%609,90028514,800 company$71341
JumpCloud jumpcloud.com8%36512,100244108,479$8,61280
Venafi venafi.com4%303,600917,407
Microsoft microsoft.com4%2942,240,000403,136145,358,109$12,455103
Astrix Security astrix.security2%961,000103,03405

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeyless.io, oneidentity.com, saviynt.com). The first result for “best non-human identity management platform” is saviynt.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best non-human identity management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which machine identity and service account security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade non-human identity management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best non-human identity management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a non-human identity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which non-human identity management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceCyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
Six alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, BeyondTrust, DigiCert, Entro Security, Keyfactor, One Identity Safeguard
CyberArk Identity Security Platform
Eight alternativesAstrix Security, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, JumpCloud, Keyfactor, Oasis Security, One Identity, Smallstep Certificate Manager
JumpCloud
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra ID with Machine Identity Extensions, One Identity
against: Oasis Security
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniCyberArk Identity Security Platform
Two alternativesOkta, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
Microsoft Entra IDChanged
Two alternativesCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Keyfactor
SailPoint Machine Identity Security
Five alternativesCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Keyfactor, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Venafi
Infisical, JumpCloudagainst: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, ForgeRock, Ping Identity, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloudno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashOasis Security
Five alternativesAembit, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Token Security
against: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
CyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
Five alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, HashiCorp Vault, Oasis Security, Venafi
Oasis Security
Six alternativesAembit, Astrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Silverfort
Akeyless Identity Security Platform
Three alternativesCyberArk Machine Identity Security, HashiCorp Vault, Oasis Security
against: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager
no first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, OpenBao
Perplexity SonarOasis Security
Three alternativesAstrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra ID
CyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
Two alternativesHashiCorp Vault, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
against: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra Workload ID, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Six alternativesAembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Clutch Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance, Okta
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
One alternativeLumos
against: CyberArk Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud
no first choiceagainst: HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft
Grok 4.20Astrix Security
Three alternativesAembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Oasis Security
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
CyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Entra Workload ID
against: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Venafi
Astrix Security
Four alternativesAembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, Oasis Security
against: HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID
Akeyless Identity Security Platform
Two alternativesOne Identity, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform
SailPoint Machine Identity Security
Six alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Entro Security, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta/Auth0, One Identity
against: Astrix Security, Defakto, Entro Security, Oasis Security, Okta, Permiso
Mistral SmallCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Three alternativesAembit, Microsoft Entra ID, Oasis Security
Keyfactor, VenafiChanged
Two alternativesCyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault
CyberArk Identity Security Platform
Five alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Saviynt Identity Cloud
SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Two alternativesJumpCloud, One Identity
no first choiceagainst: HashiCorp Vault, Lumos, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID
Five alternativesAembit, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, GitGuardian NHI Governance, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Token Security
CyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
Three alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Delinea Secret Server, Venafi
Aembit
Four alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance
against: CyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
no first choiceno first choiceagainst: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Oasis Security, Permiso, SGNL, Teleport
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceSailPoint Machine Identity SecurityChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: HashiCorp Vault, Okta, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
Qwen 3.7 FlashCyberArk Identity Security Platform
Three alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, Venafi
Akeyless Identity Security PlatformChanged
Three alternativesCyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, Smallstep Certificate Manager
CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Four alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra ID
One alternativeSaviynt Identity Cloud
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform
no first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
Kimi K2Oasis Security, Token Security
Four alternativesClutch Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Saviynt Identity Cloud, ServiceNow NHI Security
CyberArk Identity Security PlatformChanged
Two alternativesBeyondTrust, Delinea Secret Server
Microsoft Entra ID
Thirteen alternativesAembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Natoma, Oasis Security, Okta, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Token Security, Venafi
Authentik
Two alternativesHashiCorp Vault, JumpCloud
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Delinea Secret Server, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Venafi
Oasis Security
Two alternativesDefakto, Token Security
against: miniOrange REST API
GLM 4.7 FlashXCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Saviynt Identity Cloud
One alternativeOne Identity
SailPoint Machine Identity Security, VenafiChanged
Three alternativesAzure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault
Astrix Security, ServiceNow NHIM
Six alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Defakto Security, Microsoft Entra Workload ID, Okta, Saviynt Identity Cloud
JumpCloud
Three alternativesHashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Venafi
no first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft
Five alternativesAstrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Oasis Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Token Security
HashiCorp VaultChanged
Four alternativesCyberArk Conjur, Keyfactor, SPIFFE/SPIRE, Venafi
Astrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft
Five alternativesAembit, Oasis Security, Okta, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Venafi
SecureAuth
Two alternativesEntro Security, Oasis Security
against: Authentik, SailPoint Machine Identity Security
no first choiceagainst: Okta
GPT-6 LunaOasis Security
Two alternativesAembit, CyberArk Identity Security Platform
against: Astrix Security
Oasis SecurityHeld
One alternativeIdira
against: Astrix Security
CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra Workload ID, Saviynt Identity Security / Zuma
Five alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance, Oasis Security, SailPoint Agentic Fabric
Microsoft Entra Workload ID
Two alternativesCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Saviynt Identity Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, BeyondTrust Password Safe, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, GitGuardian NHI Governance, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Three alternativesCyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, Teleport
SailPoint Machine Identity SecurityChanged
Three alternativesCyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault, Venafi
CyberArk Identity Security Platform
Ten alternativesAkeyless Identity Security Platform, BeyondTrust, Defakto, Delinea Secret Server, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft, Okta, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Teleport, Venafi
JumpCloud
One alternativeTeleport Machine & Workload Identity
against: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, One Identity, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud
no first choiceagainst: HashiCorp Vault, Okta, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:30no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:47yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:26yes1122 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:13yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:37yes711 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:42yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:32yes2326 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:13yes54 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:59no028 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:05yes1522 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:53yes2581 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:09yes527 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:17yes419 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:00yes1321 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:41yes199 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:08yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:02no011 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:04yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:47yes1010 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:01yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:21yes2330 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:08yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:17yes519 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:48yes1557 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:10yes2555 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:22yes528 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:54yes316 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:49yes1218 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:40yes1812 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:11yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:45yes1128 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:19yes109 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:45yes1420 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:15yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:42yes2455 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:20yes75 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:26yes1026 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:13yes1994 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:13yes22206 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:58yes1045 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:43yes932 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:07yes2445 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:25yes1912 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:25yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:54yes625 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:27yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:54yes1311 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:17yes56 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:24yes2414 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:57yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:52yes1593 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:58yes2344 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:23yes2582 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:51yes1439 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:24yes220 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:33yes2536 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:32yes2813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:32yes79 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:55no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:46yes1011 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:46yes1416 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:49no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:05yes2445 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:25yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:24no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:39yes2528 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:33yes13162 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:43yes1021 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:20yes434 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:55yes1526 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:56yes3812 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:20yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:28yes730 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:23yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:39yes1315 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:50yes1410 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:13yes2464 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:33yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:08yes2577 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:33yes2556 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:06yes2541 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:13yes2261 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:39yes222 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:41yes2130 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akeyless read as Akeyless Identity Security Platform
Akeyless Platform read as Akeyless Identity Security Platform
AppViewX read as AppViewX CERT+
Astrix read as Astrix Security
Astrix (Cisco) read as Astrix Security
Astrix (now Cisco) read as Astrix Security
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Idira) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Palo Alto Networks) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Venafi) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (including Palo Alto Networks’ Idira) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (now Palo Alto Networks) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (now enhanced with Venafi) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
Delinea read as Delinea Secret Server
Delinea (formerly Thycotic) read as Delinea Secret Server
Entro read as Entro Security
Entro (now SailPoint) read as Entro Security
GitGuardian read as GitGuardian NHI Governance
GitGuardian Platform read as GitGuardian NHI Governance
HashiCorp read as HashiCorp Vault
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (Workload IDs) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure AD) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure Active Directory) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Oasis read as Oasis Security
Oasis (now Cyera) read as Oasis Security
Ping read as Ping Identity
SailPoint read as SailPoint Machine Identity Security
Saviynt read as Saviynt Identity Cloud
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow NHIM
ServiceNow (NHI Security / Veza) read as ServiceNow NHIM
Smallstep read as Smallstep Certificate Manager
Unresolved, counted raw
Arkion
Cremit
Defakto Security
Hidden layer
IBM Agent Identity
Microsoft Entra Agent ID
Microsoft Entra ID with Machine Identity Extensions
Okta for AI Agents
SGNL (now CrowdStrike)
SailPoint Agentic Fabric
Saviynt Identity Security / Zuma
Sonrai
Teleport Machine & Workload Identity
miniOrange REST API
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← MFAPAM →