JumpCloud is a unified platform for managing identity, access, and devices · jumpcloud.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Microsoft Entra ID at 29%.
Microsoft Entra ID is first at 46%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Entra ID is first at 53%.
“consider those with higher acceptance rates and fewer criticisms, such as JumpCloud, Aembit, Infisical, and GitGuardian NHI Governance”Mistral Small · Negative question · first choice
“JumpCloud is the clear leader, recommended by 48% of AI models for small businesses due to its affordability and robust features”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“JumpCloud and GitGuardian are often highlighted as strong, cost-effective options for non-human identity (NHI) management.”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder for Small Teams: JumpCloud ... frequently cited as a clear leader for small businesses and startups”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“JumpCloud for large, highly complex enterprises if you need deep governance... its main strength is combining directory, SSO, and device management for small and midsize organizations.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“without session recording, JIT access, or threat detection, so it may be inadequate for high-risk administrator and vendor sessions”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“General IAM or Cloud-Native Tools Repurposed for NHI (e.g., Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint, JumpCloud)”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“JumpCloud — ask what changed after its 2023 incident.”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as JumpCloud, over the 407 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 181 | 57 | Compare → | |
| 137 | 43 | Compare → | |
| 86 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 72 | 29 | View → | |
| 66 | 1 | View → | |
| 58 | 1 | View → | |
| 54 | 21 | View → | |
| 50 | 8 | View → | |
| 43 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 9 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of JumpCloud →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on JumpCloud's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 365 of the 407 answers that named JumpCloud and are not a share of its labels.
805 of the 998 domain citations in answers naming JumpCloud came from a third party's page. 113 were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,890 | 53 | 2026-09-28 | UEM, Compliance automation | |
| Glossary or explainer | 1,068 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | SIEM | |
| News or press | 243 | 8 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 184 | 5 | 2026-09-09 | ZTNA | |
| Case study | 34 | 0 | 2026-04-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 24 | 0 | 2024-11-26 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 21 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-12-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2025-12-01 |
Every page jumpcloud.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.